mirrors/django
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git synced 2025-10-31 09:41:08 +00:00
Code Issues 32 Releases Wiki Activity

Fixed typo in path to is_safe_url()

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Tim Graham
2015-02-20 09:20:38 -05:00
parent d28bcba209
commit dd0b487872
8 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/releases/1.4.13.txt
View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login`, ``django.contrib.comments``, and
:doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`) to redirect the user to an "on success" URL.
The security checks for these redirects (namely
``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
URLs, such as `http:\\\\\\djangoproject.com`, which are accepted by some browsers
with more liberal URL parsing.

2
docs/releases/1.4.18.txt
View File

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer

2
docs/releases/1.4.6.txt
View File

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login`, ``django.contrib.comments``, and
:doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`) to redirect the user to an "on success" URL.
The security checks for these redirects (namely
``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't check if the scheme is ``http(s)``
``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't check if the scheme is ``http(s)``
and as such allowed ``javascript:...`` URLs to be entered. If a developer
relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and put such a
URL into a link, they could suffer from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect

2
docs/releases/1.5.2.txt
View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login`, ``django.contrib.comments``, and
:doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`) to redirect the user to an "on success" URL.
The security checks for these redirects (namely
``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't check if the scheme is ``http(s)``
``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't check if the scheme is ``http(s)``
and as such allowed ``javascript:...`` URLs to be entered. If a developer
relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to provide safe redirect targets and put such a
URL into a link, they could suffer from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect

2
docs/releases/1.5.8.txt
View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login`, ``django.contrib.comments``, and
:doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`) to redirect the user to an "on success" URL.
The security checks for these redirects (namely
``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
URLs, such as `http:\\\\\\djangoproject.com`, which are accepted by some browsers
with more liberal URL parsing.

2
docs/releases/1.6.10.txt
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer

2
docs/releases/1.6.5.txt
View File

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login`, ``django.contrib.comments``, and
:doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`) to redirect the user to an "on success" URL.
The security checks for these redirects (namely
``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) did not correctly validate some malformed
URLs, such as `http:\\\\\\djangoproject.com`, which are accepted by some browsers
with more liberal URL parsing.

2
docs/releases/1.7.3.txt
View File

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
:func:`django.contrib.auth.views.login` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
redirects (namely ``django.util.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer