mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-31 09:41:08 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	Fixed some stale documentation that was advising against the use of OneToOneFields. Post queryset refactor, that warning is no longer required.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@7633 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This commit is contained in:
		| @@ -2037,6 +2037,37 @@ Each "reverse" operation described in this section has an immediate effect on | ||||
| the database. Every addition, creation and deletion is immediately and | ||||
| automatically saved to the database. | ||||
|  | ||||
| One-to-one relationships | ||||
| ------------------------ | ||||
|  | ||||
| One-to-one relationships are very similar to Many-to-one relationships. | ||||
| If you define a OneToOneField on your model, instances of that model will have  | ||||
| access to the related object via a simple attribute of the model. | ||||
|  | ||||
| For example:: | ||||
|  | ||||
|     class EntryDetail(models.Model): | ||||
|         entry = models.OneToOneField(Entry) | ||||
|         details = models.TextField() | ||||
|  | ||||
|     ed = EntryDetail.objects.get(id=2) | ||||
|     ed.entry # Returns the related Entry object. | ||||
|  | ||||
| The difference comes in reverse queries. The related model in a One-to-one | ||||
| relationship also has access to a ``Manager`` object; however, that ``Manager`` | ||||
| represents a single object, rather than a collection of objects:: | ||||
|  | ||||
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2) | ||||
|     e.entrydetail # returns the related EntryDetail object | ||||
|  | ||||
| If no object has been assigned to this relationship, Django will raise | ||||
| a ``DoesNotExist`` exception. | ||||
|  | ||||
| Instances can be assigned to the reverse relationship in the same way as  | ||||
| you would assign the forward relationship:: | ||||
|      | ||||
|     e.entrydetail = ed | ||||
|  | ||||
| Many-to-many relationships | ||||
| -------------------------- | ||||
|  | ||||
| @@ -2064,12 +2095,6 @@ above example, if the ``ManyToManyField`` in ``Entry`` had specified | ||||
| ``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would have an | ||||
| ``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``. | ||||
|  | ||||
| One-to-one relationships | ||||
| ------------------------ | ||||
|  | ||||
| The semantics of one-to-one relationships will be changing soon, so we don't | ||||
| recommend you use them. | ||||
|  | ||||
| How are the backward relationships possible? | ||||
| -------------------------------------------- | ||||
|  | ||||
|   | ||||
		Reference in New Issue
	
	Block a user