mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-23 09:36:06 +00:00
8925843d7e
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@4150 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
454 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
454 lines
18 KiB
Plaintext
===========================
|
|
Testing Django applications
|
|
===========================
|
|
|
|
**New in Django development version**.
|
|
|
|
Automated testing is an extremely useful weapon in the bug-killing arsenal
|
|
of the modern developer. When initially writing code, a test suite can be
|
|
used to validate that code behaves as expected. When refactoring or
|
|
modifying code, tests serve as a guide to ensure that behavior hasn't
|
|
changed unexpectedly as a result of the refactor.
|
|
|
|
Testing a web application is a complex task, as there are many
|
|
components of a web application that must be validated and tested. To
|
|
help you test your application, Django provides a test execution
|
|
framework, and range of utilities that can be used to stimulate and
|
|
inspect various facets of a web application.
|
|
|
|
This testing framework is currently under development, and may change
|
|
slightly before the next official Django release.
|
|
|
|
(That's *no* excuse not to write tests, though!)
|
|
|
|
Writing tests
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
Tests in Django come in two forms: doctests and unit tests.
|
|
|
|
Writing doctests
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
Doctests use Python's standard doctest_ module, which searches for tests in
|
|
your docstrings. Django's test runner looks for doctests in your ``models.py``
|
|
file, and executes any that it finds. Django will also search for a file
|
|
called ``tests.py`` in the application directory (i.e., the directory that
|
|
holds ``models.py``). If a ``tests.py`` is found, it will also be searched
|
|
for doctests.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: What's a **docstring**?
|
|
|
|
A good explanation of docstrings (and some guidlines for using them
|
|
effectively) can be found in :PEP:`257`:
|
|
|
|
A docstring is a string literal that occurs as the first statement in
|
|
a module, function, class, or method definition. Such a docstring
|
|
becomes the ``__doc__`` special attribute of that object.
|
|
|
|
Since tests often make great documentation, doctest lets you put your
|
|
tests directly in your docstrings.
|
|
|
|
You can put doctest strings on any object in your ``models.py``, but it's
|
|
common practice to put application-level doctests in the module docstring, and
|
|
model-level doctests in the docstring for each model.
|
|
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import model
|
|
|
|
class Animal(models.Model):
|
|
"""
|
|
An animal that knows how to make noise
|
|
|
|
# Create some animals
|
|
>>> lion = Animal.objects.create(name="lion", sound="roar")
|
|
>>> cat = Animal.objects.create(name="cat", sound="meow")
|
|
|
|
# Make 'em speak
|
|
>>> lion.speak()
|
|
'The lion says "roar"'
|
|
>>> cat.speak()
|
|
'The cat says "meow"'
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
name = models.CharField(maxlength=20)
|
|
sound = models.CharField(maxlength=20)
|
|
|
|
def speak(self):
|
|
return 'The %s says "%s"' % (self.name, self.sound)
|
|
|
|
When you `run your tests`_, the test utility will find this docstring, notice
|
|
that portions of it look like an interactive Python session, and execute those
|
|
lines while checking that the results match.
|
|
|
|
For more details about how doctest works, see the `standard library
|
|
documentation for doctest`_
|
|
|
|
.. _doctest: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html
|
|
.. _standard library documentation for doctest: doctest_
|
|
|
|
Writing unittests
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
Like doctests, Django's unit tests use a standard library module: unittest_.
|
|
As with doctests, Django's test runner looks for any unit test cases defined
|
|
in ``models.py``, or in a ``tests.py`` file stored in the application
|
|
directory.
|
|
|
|
An equivalent unittest test case for the above example would look like::
|
|
|
|
import unittest
|
|
from myapp.models import Animal
|
|
|
|
class AnimalTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
self.lion = Animal.objects.create(name="lion", sound="roar")
|
|
self.cat = Animal.objects.create(name="cat", sound="meow")
|
|
|
|
def testSpeaking(self):
|
|
self.assertEquals(self.lion.speak(), 'The lion says "roar"')
|
|
self.assertEquals(self.cat.speak(), 'The cat says "meow"')
|
|
|
|
When you `run your tests`_, the test utility will find all the test cases
|
|
(that is, subclasses of ``unittest.TestCase``) in ``models.py`` and
|
|
``tests.py``, automatically build a test suite out of those test cases,
|
|
and run that suite.
|
|
|
|
For more details about ``unittest``, see the `standard library unittest
|
|
documentation`_.
|
|
|
|
.. _unittest: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-unittest.html
|
|
.. _standard library unittest documentation: unittest_
|
|
.. _run your tests: `Running tests`_
|
|
|
|
Which should I use?
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Choosing a test framework is often contentious, so Django simply supports
|
|
both of the standard Python test frameworks. Choosing one is up to each
|
|
developer's personal tastes; each is supported equally. Since each test
|
|
system has different benefits, the best approach is probably to use both
|
|
together, picking the test system to match the type of tests you need to
|
|
write.
|
|
|
|
For developers new to testing, however, this choice can seem
|
|
confusing, so here are a few key differences to help you decide whether
|
|
doctests or unit tests are right for you.
|
|
|
|
If you've been using Python for a while, ``doctest`` will probably feel more
|
|
"pythonic". It's designed to make writing tests as easy as possible, so
|
|
there's no overhead of writing classes or methods; you simply put tests in
|
|
docstrings. This gives the added advantage of given your modules automatic
|
|
documentation -- well-written doctests can kill both the documentation and the
|
|
testing bird with a single stone.
|
|
|
|
For developers just getting started with testing, using doctests will probably
|
|
get you started faster.
|
|
|
|
The ``unittest`` framework will probably feel very familiar to developers
|
|
coming from Java. Since ``unittest`` is inspired by Java's JUnit, if
|
|
you've used testing frameworks in other languages that similarly were
|
|
inspired by JUnit, ``unittest`` should also feel pretty familiar.
|
|
|
|
Since ``unittest`` is organized around classes and methods, if you need
|
|
to write a bunch of tests that all share similar code, you can easily use
|
|
subclass to abstract common tasks; this makes test code shorter and cleaner.
|
|
There's also support for explicit setup and/or cleanup routines, which give
|
|
you a high level of control over the environment your test cases run in.
|
|
|
|
Again, remember that you can use both systems side-by-side (even in the same
|
|
app). In the end, most projects will eventually end up using both; each shines
|
|
in different circumstances.
|
|
|
|
Testing Tools
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
To assist in testing various features of your application, Django provides
|
|
tools that can be used to establish tests and test conditions.
|
|
|
|
* `Test Client`_
|
|
* Fixtures_
|
|
|
|
Test Client
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
The Test Client is a simple dummy browser. It allows you to simulate
|
|
GET and POST requests on a URL, and observe the response that is received.
|
|
This allows you to test that the correct view is executed for a given URL,
|
|
and that the view constructs the correct response.
|
|
|
|
As the response is generated, the Test Client gathers details on the
|
|
Template and Context objects that were used to generate the response. These
|
|
Templates and Contexts are then provided as part of the response, and can be
|
|
used as test conditions.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Test Client vs Browser Automation?
|
|
|
|
The Test Client is not intended as a replacement for Twill_, Selenium_,
|
|
or other browser automation frameworks - it is intended to allow
|
|
testing of the contexts and templates produced by a view,
|
|
rather than the HTML rendered to the end-user.
|
|
|
|
A comprehensive test suite should use a combination of both: Test Client
|
|
tests to establish that the correct view is being called and that
|
|
the view is collecting the correct context data, and Browser Automation
|
|
tests to check that user interface behaves as expected.
|
|
|
|
.. _Twill: http://twill.idyll.org/
|
|
.. _Selenium: http://www.openqa.org/selenium/
|
|
|
|
The Test Client is stateful; if a cookie is returned as part of a response,
|
|
that cookie is provided as part of the next request issued to that Client
|
|
instance. Expiry policies for these cookies are not followed; if you want
|
|
a cookie to expire, either delete it manually from ``client.cookies``, or
|
|
create a new Client instance (which will effectively delete all cookies).
|
|
|
|
Making requests
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Creating an instance of ``Client`` (``django.test.client.Client``) requires
|
|
no arguments at time of construction. Once constructed, the following methods
|
|
can be invoked on the ``Client`` instance.
|
|
|
|
``get(path, data={})``
|
|
Make a GET request on the provided ``path``. The key-value pairs in the
|
|
data dictionary will be used to create a GET data payload. For example::
|
|
|
|
c = Client()
|
|
c.get('/customers/details/', {'name':'fred', 'age':7})
|
|
|
|
will result in the evaluation of a GET request equivalent to::
|
|
|
|
http://yoursite.com/customers/details/?name='fred'&age=7
|
|
|
|
``post(path, data={})``
|
|
Make a POST request on the provided ``path``. The key-value pairs in the
|
|
data dictionary will be used to create the POST data payload. This payload
|
|
will be transmitted with the mimetype ``multipart/form-data``.
|
|
|
|
However submitting files is a special case. To POST a file, you need only
|
|
provide the file field name as a key, and a file handle to the file you wish to
|
|
upload as a value. The Test Client will populate the two POST fields (i.e.,
|
|
``field`` and ``field_file``) required by FileField. For example::
|
|
|
|
c = Client()
|
|
f = open('wishlist.doc')
|
|
c.post('/customers/wishes/', {'name':'fred', 'attachment':f})
|
|
f.close()
|
|
|
|
will result in the evaluation of a POST request on ``/customers/wishes/``,
|
|
with a POST dictionary that contains `name`, `attachment` (containing the
|
|
file name), and `attachment_file` (containing the file data). Note that you
|
|
need to manually close the file after it has been provided to the POST.
|
|
|
|
``login(path, username, password)``
|
|
In a production site, it is likely that some views will be protected with
|
|
the @login_required URL provided by ``django.contrib.auth``. Interacting
|
|
with a URL that has been login protected is a slightly complex operation,
|
|
so the Test Client provides a simple URL to automate the login process. A
|
|
call to ``login()`` stimulates the series of GET and POST calls required
|
|
to log a user into a @login_required protected URL.
|
|
|
|
If login is possible, the final return value of ``login()`` is the response
|
|
that is generated by issuing a GET request on the protected URL. If login
|
|
is not possible, ``login()`` returns False.
|
|
|
|
Note that since the test suite will be executed using the test database,
|
|
which contains no users by default. As a result, logins for your production
|
|
site will not work. You will need to create users as part of the test suite
|
|
to be able to test logins to your application.
|
|
|
|
Testing Responses
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The ``get()``, ``post()`` and ``login()`` methods all return a Response
|
|
object. This Response object has the following properties that can be used
|
|
for testing purposes:
|
|
|
|
=============== ==========================================================
|
|
Property Description
|
|
=============== ==========================================================
|
|
``status_code`` The HTTP status of the response. See RFC2616_ for a
|
|
full list of HTTP status codes.
|
|
|
|
``content`` The body of the response. The is the final page
|
|
content as rendered by the view, or any error message
|
|
(such as the URL for a 302 redirect).
|
|
|
|
``template`` The Template instance that was used to render the final
|
|
content. Testing ``template.name`` can be particularly
|
|
useful; if the template was loaded from a file,
|
|
``template.name`` will be the file name that was loaded.
|
|
|
|
If multiple templates were rendered, (e.g., if one
|
|
template includes another template),``template`` will
|
|
be a list of Template objects, in the order in which
|
|
they were rendered.
|
|
|
|
``context`` The Context that was used to render the template that
|
|
produced the response content.
|
|
|
|
As with ``template``, if multiple templates were rendered
|
|
``context`` will be a list of Context objects, stored in
|
|
the order in which they were rendered.
|
|
=============== ==========================================================
|
|
|
|
.. _RFC2616: http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html
|
|
|
|
The following is a simple unit test using the Test Client::
|
|
|
|
import unittest
|
|
from django.test.client import Client
|
|
|
|
class SimpleTest(unittest.TestCase):
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
# Every test needs a client
|
|
self.client = Client()
|
|
def test_details(self):
|
|
# Issue a GET request
|
|
response = self.client.get('/customer/details/')
|
|
|
|
# Check that the respose is 200 OK
|
|
self.failUnlessEqual(response.status_code, 200)
|
|
# Check that the rendered context contains 5 customers
|
|
self.failUnlessEqual(len(response.context['customers']), 5)
|
|
|
|
Fixtures
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
Feature still to come...
|
|
|
|
Running tests
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
Run your tests using your project's ``manage.py`` utility::
|
|
|
|
$ ./manage.py test
|
|
|
|
If you only want to run tests for a particular application, add the
|
|
application name to the command line. For example, if your
|
|
``INSTALLED_APPS`` contains ``myproject.polls`` and ``myproject.animals``,
|
|
but you only want to run the animals unit tests, run::
|
|
|
|
$ ./manage.py test animals
|
|
|
|
When you run your tests, you'll see a bunch of text flow by as the test
|
|
database is created and models are initialized. This test database is
|
|
created from scratch every time you run your tests.
|
|
|
|
By default, the test database gets its name by prepending ``test_`` to
|
|
the database name specified by the ``DATABASE_NAME`` setting; all other
|
|
database settings will the same as they would be for the project normally.
|
|
If you wish to use a name other than the default for the test database,
|
|
you can use the ``TEST_DATABASE_NAME`` setting to provide a name.
|
|
|
|
Once the test database has been established, Django will run your tests.
|
|
If everything goes well, at the end you'll see::
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Ran 22 tests in 0.221s
|
|
|
|
OK
|
|
|
|
If there are test failures, however, you'll see full details about what tests
|
|
failed::
|
|
|
|
======================================================================
|
|
FAIL: Doctest: ellington.core.throttle.models
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
|
File "/dev/django/test/doctest.py", line 2153, in runTest
|
|
raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
|
|
AssertionError: Failed doctest test for myapp.models
|
|
File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 0, in models
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 14, in myapp.models
|
|
Failed example:
|
|
throttle.check("actor A", "action one", limit=2, hours=1)
|
|
Expected:
|
|
True
|
|
Got:
|
|
False
|
|
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Ran 2 tests in 0.048s
|
|
|
|
FAILED (failures=1)
|
|
|
|
When the tests have all been executed, the test database is destroyed.
|
|
|
|
Using a different testing framework
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
Doctest and Unittest are not the only Python testing frameworks. While
|
|
Django doesn't provide explicit support these alternative frameworks,
|
|
it does provide a mechanism to allow you to invoke tests constructed for
|
|
an alternative framework as if they were normal Django tests.
|
|
|
|
When you run ``./manage.py test``, Django looks at the ``TEST_RUNNER``
|
|
setting to determine what to do. By default, ``TEST_RUNNER`` points to ``django.test.simple.run_tests``. This method defines the default Django
|
|
testing behavior. This behavior involves:
|
|
|
|
#. Performing global pre-test setup
|
|
#. Creating the test database
|
|
#. Running ``syncdb`` to install models and initial data into the test database
|
|
#. Looking for Unit Tests and Doctests in ``models.py`` and ``tests.py`` file for each installed application
|
|
#. Running the Unit Tests and Doctests that are found
|
|
#. Destroying the test database.
|
|
#. Performing global post-test teardown
|
|
|
|
If you define your own test runner method and point ``TEST_RUNNER``
|
|
at that method, Django will execute your test runner whenever you run
|
|
``./manage.py test``. In this way, it is possible to use any test
|
|
framework that can be executed from Python code.
|
|
|
|
Defining a test runner
|
|
----------------------
|
|
By convention, a test runner should be called ``run_tests``; however, you
|
|
can call it anything you want. The only requirement is that it accept two
|
|
arguments:
|
|
|
|
``run_tests(module_list, verbosity=1)``
|
|
The module list is the list of Python modules that contain the models to be
|
|
tested. This is the same format returned by ``django.db.models.get_apps()``
|
|
|
|
Verbosity determines the amount of notification and debug information that
|
|
will be printed to the console; '0' is no output, '1' is normal output,
|
|
and `2` is verbose output.
|
|
|
|
Testing utilities
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
To assist in the creation of your own test runner, Django provides
|
|
a number of utility methods in the ``django.test.utils`` module.
|
|
|
|
``setup_test_environment()``
|
|
Performs any global pre-test setup, such as the installing the
|
|
instrumentation of the template rendering system.
|
|
|
|
``teardown_test_environment()``
|
|
Performs any global post-test teardown, such as removing the instrumentation
|
|
of the template rendering system.
|
|
|
|
``create_test_db(verbosity=1, autoclobber=False)``
|
|
Creates a new test database, and run ``syncdb`` against it.
|
|
|
|
``verbosity`` has the same behavior as in the test runner.
|
|
|
|
``Autoclobber`` describes the behavior that will occur if a database with
|
|
the same name as the test database is discovered. If ``autoclobber`` is False,
|
|
the user will be asked to approve destroying the existing database. ``sys.exit``
|
|
is called if the user does not approve. If autoclobber is ``True``, the database
|
|
will be destroyed without consulting the user.
|
|
|
|
``create_test_db()`` has the side effect of modifying
|
|
``settings.DATABASE_NAME`` to match the name of the test database.
|
|
|
|
``destroy_test_db(old_database_name, verbosity=1)``
|
|
Destroys the database with the name ``settings.DATABASE_NAME`` matching,
|
|
and restores the value of ``settings.DATABASE_NAME`` to the provided name.
|
|
|
|
``verbosity`` has the same behavior as in the test runner.
|