mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-23 17:46:27 +00:00
7aacde84f2
enter_transaction_management() was nearly always followed by managed(). In three places it wasn't, but they will all be refactored eventually. The "forced" keyword argument avoids introducing behavior changes until then. This is mostly backwards-compatible, except, of course, for managed itself. There's a minor difference in _enter_transaction_management: the top self.transaction_state now contains the new 'managed' state rather than the previous one. Django doesn't access self.transaction_state in _enter_transaction_management.
361 lines
13 KiB
Python
361 lines
13 KiB
Python
from __future__ import absolute_import
|
|
|
|
import datetime
|
|
|
|
from django.conf import settings
|
|
from django.db import transaction, DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS, models
|
|
from django.db.utils import ConnectionHandler
|
|
from django.test import TestCase, TransactionTestCase, skipUnlessDBFeature
|
|
|
|
from .models import (Book, Award, AwardNote, Person, Child, Toy, PlayedWith,
|
|
PlayedWithNote, Email, Researcher, Food, Eaten, Policy, Version, Location,
|
|
Item, Image, File, Photo, FooFile, FooImage, FooPhoto, FooFileProxy, Login,
|
|
OrgUnit, OrderedPerson, House)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Can't run this test under SQLite, because you can't
|
|
# get two connections to an in-memory database.
|
|
class DeleteLockingTest(TransactionTestCase):
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
# Create a second connection to the default database
|
|
new_connections = ConnectionHandler(settings.DATABASES)
|
|
self.conn2 = new_connections[DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS]
|
|
# Put both DB connections into managed transaction mode
|
|
transaction.enter_transaction_management()
|
|
self.conn2.enter_transaction_management()
|
|
|
|
def tearDown(self):
|
|
# Close down the second connection.
|
|
transaction.leave_transaction_management()
|
|
self.conn2.abort()
|
|
self.conn2.close()
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature('test_db_allows_multiple_connections')
|
|
def test_concurrent_delete(self):
|
|
"Deletes on concurrent transactions don't collide and lock the database. Regression for #9479"
|
|
|
|
# Create some dummy data
|
|
b1 = Book(id=1, pagecount=100)
|
|
b2 = Book(id=2, pagecount=200)
|
|
b3 = Book(id=3, pagecount=300)
|
|
b1.save()
|
|
b2.save()
|
|
b3.save()
|
|
|
|
transaction.commit()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(3, Book.objects.count())
|
|
|
|
# Delete something using connection 2.
|
|
cursor2 = self.conn2.cursor()
|
|
cursor2.execute('DELETE from delete_regress_book WHERE id=1')
|
|
self.conn2._commit()
|
|
|
|
# Now perform a queryset delete that covers the object
|
|
# deleted in connection 2. This causes an infinite loop
|
|
# under MySQL InnoDB unless we keep track of already
|
|
# deleted objects.
|
|
Book.objects.filter(pagecount__lt=250).delete()
|
|
transaction.commit()
|
|
self.assertEqual(1, Book.objects.count())
|
|
transaction.commit()
|
|
|
|
|
|
class DeleteCascadeTests(TestCase):
|
|
def test_generic_relation_cascade(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Django cascades deletes through generic-related objects to their
|
|
reverse relations.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
person = Person.objects.create(name='Nelson Mandela')
|
|
award = Award.objects.create(name='Nobel', content_object=person)
|
|
note = AwardNote.objects.create(note='a peace prize',
|
|
award=award)
|
|
self.assertEqual(AwardNote.objects.count(), 1)
|
|
person.delete()
|
|
self.assertEqual(Award.objects.count(), 0)
|
|
# first two asserts are just sanity checks, this is the kicker:
|
|
self.assertEqual(AwardNote.objects.count(), 0)
|
|
|
|
def test_fk_to_m2m_through(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
If an M2M relationship has an explicitly-specified through model, and
|
|
some other model has an FK to that through model, deletion is cascaded
|
|
from one of the participants in the M2M, to the through model, to its
|
|
related model.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
juan = Child.objects.create(name='Juan')
|
|
paints = Toy.objects.create(name='Paints')
|
|
played = PlayedWith.objects.create(child=juan, toy=paints,
|
|
date=datetime.date.today())
|
|
note = PlayedWithNote.objects.create(played=played,
|
|
note='the next Jackson Pollock')
|
|
self.assertEqual(PlayedWithNote.objects.count(), 1)
|
|
paints.delete()
|
|
self.assertEqual(PlayedWith.objects.count(), 0)
|
|
# first two asserts just sanity checks, this is the kicker:
|
|
self.assertEqual(PlayedWithNote.objects.count(), 0)
|
|
|
|
def test_15776(self):
|
|
policy = Policy.objects.create(pk=1, policy_number="1234")
|
|
version = Version.objects.create(policy=policy)
|
|
location = Location.objects.create(version=version)
|
|
item = Item.objects.create(version=version, location=location)
|
|
policy.delete()
|
|
|
|
|
|
class DeleteCascadeTransactionTests(TransactionTestCase):
|
|
def test_inheritance(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Auto-created many-to-many through tables referencing a parent model are
|
|
correctly found by the delete cascade when a child of that parent is
|
|
deleted.
|
|
|
|
Refs #14896.
|
|
"""
|
|
r = Researcher.objects.create()
|
|
email = Email.objects.create(
|
|
label="office-email", email_address="carl@science.edu"
|
|
)
|
|
r.contacts.add(email)
|
|
|
|
email.delete()
|
|
|
|
def test_to_field(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Cascade deletion works with ForeignKey.to_field set to non-PK.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
apple = Food.objects.create(name="apple")
|
|
eaten = Eaten.objects.create(food=apple, meal="lunch")
|
|
|
|
apple.delete()
|
|
self.assertFalse(Food.objects.exists())
|
|
self.assertFalse(Eaten.objects.exists())
|
|
|
|
|
|
class LargeDeleteTests(TestCase):
|
|
def test_large_deletes(self):
|
|
"Regression for #13309 -- if the number of objects > chunk size, deletion still occurs"
|
|
for x in range(300):
|
|
track = Book.objects.create(pagecount=x+100)
|
|
# attach a signal to make sure we will not fast-delete
|
|
def noop(*args, **kwargs):
|
|
pass
|
|
models.signals.post_delete.connect(noop, sender=Book)
|
|
Book.objects.all().delete()
|
|
models.signals.post_delete.disconnect(noop, sender=Book)
|
|
self.assertEqual(Book.objects.count(), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
class ProxyDeleteTest(TestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Tests on_delete behavior for proxy models.
|
|
|
|
See #16128.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
def create_image(self):
|
|
"""Return an Image referenced by both a FooImage and a FooFile."""
|
|
# Create an Image
|
|
test_image = Image()
|
|
test_image.save()
|
|
foo_image = FooImage(my_image=test_image)
|
|
foo_image.save()
|
|
|
|
# Get the Image instance as a File
|
|
test_file = File.objects.get(pk=test_image.pk)
|
|
foo_file = FooFile(my_file=test_file)
|
|
foo_file.save()
|
|
|
|
return test_image
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_delete_proxy(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Deleting the *proxy* instance bubbles through to its non-proxy and
|
|
*all* referring objects are deleted.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
self.create_image()
|
|
|
|
Image.objects.all().delete()
|
|
|
|
# An Image deletion == File deletion
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(Image.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(File.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# The Image deletion cascaded and *all* references to it are deleted.
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooImage.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooFile.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_delete_proxy_of_proxy(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Deleting a proxy-of-proxy instance should bubble through to its proxy
|
|
and non-proxy parents, deleting *all* referring objects.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
test_image = self.create_image()
|
|
|
|
# Get the Image as a Photo
|
|
test_photo = Photo.objects.get(pk=test_image.pk)
|
|
foo_photo = FooPhoto(my_photo=test_photo)
|
|
foo_photo.save()
|
|
|
|
Photo.objects.all().delete()
|
|
|
|
# A Photo deletion == Image deletion == File deletion
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(Photo.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(Image.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(File.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# The Photo deletion should have cascaded and deleted *all*
|
|
# references to it.
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooPhoto.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooFile.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooImage.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_delete_concrete_parent(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
Deleting an instance of a concrete model should also delete objects
|
|
referencing its proxy subclass.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
self.create_image()
|
|
|
|
File.objects.all().delete()
|
|
|
|
# A File deletion == Image deletion
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(File.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(Image.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
# The File deletion should have cascaded and deleted *all* references
|
|
# to it.
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooFile.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooImage.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_delete_proxy_pair(self):
|
|
"""
|
|
If a pair of proxy models are linked by an FK from one concrete parent
|
|
to the other, deleting one proxy model cascade-deletes the other, and
|
|
the deletion happens in the right order (not triggering an
|
|
IntegrityError on databases unable to defer integrity checks).
|
|
|
|
Refs #17918.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
# Create an Image (proxy of File) and FooFileProxy (proxy of FooFile,
|
|
# which has an FK to File)
|
|
image = Image.objects.create()
|
|
as_file = File.objects.get(pk=image.pk)
|
|
FooFileProxy.objects.create(my_file=as_file)
|
|
|
|
Image.objects.all().delete()
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(len(FooFileProxy.objects.all()), 0)
|
|
|
|
def test_19187_values(self):
|
|
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
|
Image.objects.values().delete()
|
|
with self.assertRaises(TypeError):
|
|
Image.objects.values_list().delete()
|
|
|
|
class Ticket19102Tests(TestCase):
|
|
"""
|
|
Test different queries which alter the SELECT clause of the query. We
|
|
also must be using a subquery for the deletion (that is, the original
|
|
query has a join in it). The deletion should be done as "fast-path"
|
|
deletion (that is, just one query for the .delete() call).
|
|
|
|
Note that .values() is not tested here on purpose. .values().delete()
|
|
doesn't work for non fast-path deletes at all.
|
|
"""
|
|
def setUp(self):
|
|
self.o1 = OrgUnit.objects.create(name='o1')
|
|
self.o2 = OrgUnit.objects.create(name='o2')
|
|
self.l1 = Login.objects.create(description='l1', orgunit=self.o1)
|
|
self.l2 = Login.objects.create(description='l2', orgunit=self.o2)
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature("update_can_self_select")
|
|
def test_ticket_19102_annotate(self):
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
Login.objects.order_by('description').filter(
|
|
orgunit__name__isnull=False
|
|
).annotate(
|
|
n=models.Count('description')
|
|
).filter(
|
|
n=1, pk=self.l1.pk
|
|
).delete()
|
|
self.assertFalse(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l1.pk).exists())
|
|
self.assertTrue(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l2.pk).exists())
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature("update_can_self_select")
|
|
def test_ticket_19102_extra(self):
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
Login.objects.order_by('description').filter(
|
|
orgunit__name__isnull=False
|
|
).extra(
|
|
select={'extraf':'1'}
|
|
).filter(
|
|
pk=self.l1.pk
|
|
).delete()
|
|
self.assertFalse(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l1.pk).exists())
|
|
self.assertTrue(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l2.pk).exists())
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature("update_can_self_select")
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature('can_distinct_on_fields')
|
|
def test_ticket_19102_distinct_on(self):
|
|
# Both Login objs should have same description so that only the one
|
|
# having smaller PK will be deleted.
|
|
Login.objects.update(description='description')
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
Login.objects.distinct('description').order_by('pk').filter(
|
|
orgunit__name__isnull=False
|
|
).delete()
|
|
# Assumed that l1 which is created first has smaller PK.
|
|
self.assertFalse(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l1.pk).exists())
|
|
self.assertTrue(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l2.pk).exists())
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature("update_can_self_select")
|
|
def test_ticket_19102_select_related(self):
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
Login.objects.filter(
|
|
pk=self.l1.pk
|
|
).filter(
|
|
orgunit__name__isnull=False
|
|
).order_by(
|
|
'description'
|
|
).select_related('orgunit').delete()
|
|
self.assertFalse(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l1.pk).exists())
|
|
self.assertTrue(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l2.pk).exists())
|
|
|
|
@skipUnlessDBFeature("update_can_self_select")
|
|
def test_ticket_19102_defer(self):
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
Login.objects.filter(
|
|
pk=self.l1.pk
|
|
).filter(
|
|
orgunit__name__isnull=False
|
|
).order_by(
|
|
'description'
|
|
).only('id').delete()
|
|
self.assertFalse(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l1.pk).exists())
|
|
self.assertTrue(Login.objects.filter(pk=self.l2.pk).exists())
|
|
|
|
|
|
class OrderedDeleteTests(TestCase):
|
|
def test_meta_ordered_delete(self):
|
|
# When a subquery is performed by deletion code, the subquery must be
|
|
# cleared of all ordering. There was a but that caused _meta ordering
|
|
# to be used. Refs #19720.
|
|
h = House.objects.create(address='Foo')
|
|
OrderedPerson.objects.create(name='Jack', lives_in=h)
|
|
OrderedPerson.objects.create(name='Bob', lives_in=h)
|
|
OrderedPerson.objects.filter(lives_in__address='Foo').delete()
|
|
self.assertEqual(OrderedPerson.objects.count(), 0)
|