mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-31 09:41:08 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			1256 lines
		
	
	
		
			49 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			1256 lines
		
	
	
		
			49 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ==============
 | |
| Making queries
 | |
| ==============
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.db.models
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've created your :doc:`data models </topics/db/models>`, Django
 | |
| automatically gives you a database-abstraction API that lets you create,
 | |
| retrieve, update and delete objects. This document explains how to use this
 | |
| API. Refer to the :doc:`data model reference </ref/models/index>` for full
 | |
| details of all the various model lookup options.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Throughout this guide (and in the reference), we'll refer to the following
 | |
| models, which comprise a Weblog application:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _queryset-model-example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: python
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Blog(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
 | |
|         tagline = models.TextField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Author(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
|         email = models.EmailField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.name
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Entry(models.Model):
 | |
|         blog = models.ForeignKey(Blog)
 | |
|         headline = models.CharField(max_length=255)
 | |
|         body_text = models.TextField()
 | |
|         pub_date = models.DateTimeField()
 | |
|         mod_date = models.DateTimeField()
 | |
|         authors = models.ManyToManyField(Author)
 | |
|         n_comments = models.IntegerField()
 | |
|         n_pingbacks = models.IntegerField()
 | |
|         rating = models.IntegerField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return self.headline
 | |
| 
 | |
| Creating objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To represent database-table data in Python objects, Django uses an intuitive
 | |
| system: A model class represents a database table, and an instance of that
 | |
| class represents a particular record in the database table.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create an object, instantiate it using keyword arguments to the model class,
 | |
| then call :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` to save it to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You import the model class from wherever it lives on the Python path, as you
 | |
| may expect. (We point this out here because previous Django versions required
 | |
| funky model importing.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assuming models live in a file ``mysite/blog/models.py``, here's an example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Blog
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog(name='Beatles Blog', tagline='All the latest Beatles news.')
 | |
|     >>> b.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``INSERT`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` method has no return value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` takes a number of advanced options not
 | |
|     described here. See the documentation for
 | |
|     :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` for complete details.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     To create and save an object in a single step, use the
 | |
|     :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.create()` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving changes to objects
 | |
| =========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To save changes to an object that's already in the database, use
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Given a ``Blog`` instance ``b5`` that has already been saved to the database,
 | |
| this example changes its name and updates its record in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >> b5.name = 'New name'
 | |
|     >> b5.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This performs an ``UPDATE`` SQL statement behind the scenes. Django doesn't hit
 | |
| the database until you explicitly call :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving ``ForeignKey`` and ``ManyToManyField`` fields
 | |
| ----------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating a :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` field works exactly the same
 | |
| way as saving a normal field -- simply assign an object of the right type to
 | |
| the field in question. This example updates the ``blog`` attribute of an
 | |
| ``Entry`` instance ``entry``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Entry
 | |
|     >>> entry = Entry.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
|     >>> cheese_blog = Blog.objects.get(name="Cheddar Talk")
 | |
|     >>> entry.blog = cheese_blog
 | |
|     >>> entry.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating a :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` works a little
 | |
| differently -- use the
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.fields.related.RelatedManager.add` method on the field
 | |
| to add a record to the relation. This example adds the ``Author`` instance
 | |
| ``joe`` to the ``entry`` object::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from blog.models import Author
 | |
|     >>> joe = Author.objects.create(name="Joe")
 | |
|     >>> entry.authors.add(joe)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To add multiple records to a :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` in one
 | |
| go, include multiple arguments in the call to
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.fields.related.RelatedManager.add`, like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> john = Author.objects.create(name="John")
 | |
|     >>> paul = Author.objects.create(name="Paul")
 | |
|     >>> george = Author.objects.create(name="George")
 | |
|     >>> ringo = Author.objects.create(name="Ringo")
 | |
|     >>> entry.authors.add(john, paul, george, ringo)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django will complain if you try to assign or add an object of the wrong type.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving objects
 | |
| ==================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve objects from your database, construct a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` via a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` on your model class.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` represents a collection of objects
 | |
| from your database. It can have zero, one or many *filters* -- criteria that
 | |
| narrow down the collection based on given parameters. In SQL terms, a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` equates to a ``SELECT`` statement,
 | |
| and a filter is a limiting clause such as ``WHERE`` or ``LIMIT``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You get a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` by using your model's
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager`. Each model has at least one
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager`, and it's called ``objects`` by
 | |
| default. Access it directly via the model class, like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects
 | |
|     <django.db.models.manager.Manager object at ...>
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog(name='Foo', tagline='Bar')
 | |
|     >>> b.objects
 | |
|     Traceback:
 | |
|         ...
 | |
|     AttributeError: "Manager isn't accessible via Blog instances."
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``Managers`` are accessible only via model classes, rather than from model
 | |
|     instances, to enforce a separation between "table-level" operations and
 | |
|     "record-level" operations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` is the main source of ``QuerySets`` for
 | |
| a model. It acts as a "root" :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that
 | |
| describes all objects in the model's database table. For example,
 | |
| ``Blog.objects`` is the initial :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that
 | |
| contains all ``Blog`` objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving all objects
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The simplest way to retrieve objects from a table is to get all of them. To do
 | |
| this, use the :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all` method on a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager`::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> all_entries = Entry.objects.all()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all` method returns a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` of all the objects in the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (If ``Entry.objects`` is a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, why can't
 | |
| we just do ``Entry.objects``?  That's because ``Entry.objects``, the root
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, is a special case that cannot be
 | |
| evaluated. The :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all` method returns a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that *can* be evaluated.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving specific objects with filters
 | |
| ----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The root :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` provided by the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` describes all objects in the database
 | |
| table. Usually, though, you'll need to select only a subset of the complete set
 | |
| of objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create such a subset, you refine the initial
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, adding filter conditions. The two
 | |
| most common ways to refine a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``filter(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Returns a new :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` containing objects
 | |
|     that match the given lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``exclude(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Returns a new :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` containing objects
 | |
|     that do *not* match the given lookup parameters.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The lookup parameters (``**kwargs`` in the above function definitions) should
 | |
| be in the format described in `Field lookups`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, to get a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` of blog entries
 | |
| from the year 2006, use :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` like
 | |
| so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2006)
 | |
| 
 | |
| We don't have to add an :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all` --
 | |
| ``Entry.objects.all().filter(...)``. That would still work, but you only need
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all` when you want all objects from the
 | |
| root :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _chaining-filters:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Chaining filters
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The result of refining a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` is itself a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, so it's possible to chain
 | |
| refinements together. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(
 | |
|     ...     headline__startswith='What'
 | |
|     ... ).exclude(
 | |
|     ...     pub_date__gte=datetime.now()
 | |
|     ... ).filter(
 | |
|     ...     pub_date__gte=datetime(2005, 1, 1)
 | |
|     ... )
 | |
| 
 | |
| This takes the initial :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` of all entries
 | |
| in the database, adds a filter, then an exclusion, then another filter. The
 | |
| final result is a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` containing all
 | |
| entries with a headline that starts with "What", that were published between
 | |
| January 1, 2005, and the current day.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _filtered-querysets-are-unique:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filtered QuerySets are unique
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each time you refine a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, you get a
 | |
| brand-new :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that is in no way bound to
 | |
| the previous :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`. Each refinement creates
 | |
| a separate and distinct :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that can be
 | |
| stored, used and reused.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >> q1 = Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith="What")
 | |
|     >> q2 = q1.exclude(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
|     >> q3 = q1.filter(pub_date__gte=datetime.now())
 | |
| 
 | |
| These three ``QuerySets`` are separate. The first is a base
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` containing all entries that contain a
 | |
| headline starting with "What". The second is a subset of the first, with an
 | |
| additional criteria that excludes records whose ``pub_date`` is greater than
 | |
| now. The third is a subset of the first, with an additional criteria that
 | |
| selects only the records whose ``pub_date`` is greater than now. The initial
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` (``q1``) is unaffected by the
 | |
| refinement process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _querysets-are-lazy:
 | |
| 
 | |
| QuerySets are lazy
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``QuerySets`` are lazy -- the act of creating a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` doesn't involve any database
 | |
| activity. You can stack filters together all day long, and Django won't
 | |
| actually run the query until the :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` is
 | |
| *evaluated*. Take a look at this example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> q = Entry.objects.filter(headline__startswith="What")
 | |
|     >>> q = q.filter(pub_date__lte=datetime.now())
 | |
|     >>> q = q.exclude(body_text__icontains="food")
 | |
|     >>> print(q)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Though this looks like three database hits, in fact it hits the database only
 | |
| once, at the last line (``print(q)``). In general, the results of a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` aren't fetched from the database
 | |
| until you "ask" for them. When you do, the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` is *evaluated* by accessing the
 | |
| database. For more details on exactly when evaluation takes place, see
 | |
| :ref:`when-querysets-are-evaluated`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _retrieving-single-object-with-get:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Retrieving a single object with get
 | |
| -----------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` will always give you a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, even if only a single object matches
 | |
| the query - in this case, it will be a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` containing a single element.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you know there is only one object that matches your query, you can use the
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get` method on a `Manager` which
 | |
| returns the object directly::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> one_entry = Entry.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use any query expression with
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get`, just like with
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` - again, see `Field lookups`_
 | |
| below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that there is a difference between using
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get`, and using
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` with a slice of ``[0]``. If
 | |
| there are no results that match the query,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get` will raise a ``DoesNotExist``
 | |
| exception. This exception is an attribute of the model class that the query is
 | |
| being performed on - so in the code above, if there is no ``Entry`` object with
 | |
| a primary key of 1, Django will raise ``Entry.DoesNotExist``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly, Django will complain if more than one item matches the
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get` query. In this case, it will raise
 | |
| ``MultipleObjectsReturned``, which again is an attribute of the model class
 | |
| itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other QuerySet methods
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most of the time you'll use :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.all`,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get`,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` and
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude` when you need to look up
 | |
| objects from the database. However, that's far from all there is; see the
 | |
| :ref:`QuerySet API Reference <queryset-api>` for a complete list of all the
 | |
| various :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` methods.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _limiting-querysets:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Limiting QuerySets
 | |
| ------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Use a subset of Python's array-slicing syntax to limit your
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` to a certain number of results. This
 | |
| is the equivalent of SQL's ``LIMIT`` and ``OFFSET`` clauses.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this returns the first 5 objects (``LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[:5]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This returns the sixth through tenth objects (``OFFSET 5 LIMIT 5``)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[5:10]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Negative indexing (i.e. ``Entry.objects.all()[-1]``) is not supported.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Generally, slicing a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` returns a new
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` -- it doesn't evaluate the query. An
 | |
| exception is if you use the "step" parameter of Python slice syntax. For
 | |
| example, this would actually execute the query in order to return a list of
 | |
| every *second* object of the first 10::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all()[:10:2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| To retrieve a *single* object rather than a list
 | |
| (e.g. ``SELECT foo FROM bar LIMIT 1``), use a simple index instead of a
 | |
| slice. For example, this returns the first ``Entry`` in the database, after
 | |
| ordering entries alphabetically by headline::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0]
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is roughly equivalent to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.order_by('headline')[0:1].get()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note, however, that the first of these will raise ``IndexError`` while the
 | |
| second will raise ``DoesNotExist`` if no objects match the given criteria. See
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _field-lookups-intro:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups
 | |
| -------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Field lookups are how you specify the meat of an SQL ``WHERE`` clause. They're
 | |
| specified as keyword arguments to the :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`
 | |
| methods :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter`,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude` and
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Basic lookups keyword arguments take the form ``field__lookuptype=value``.
 | |
| (That's a double-underscore). For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__lte='2006-01-01')
 | |
| 
 | |
| translates (roughly) into the following SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * FROM blog_entry WHERE pub_date <= '2006-01-01';
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: How this is possible
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Python has the ability to define functions that accept arbitrary name-value
 | |
|    arguments whose names and values are evaluated at runtime. For more
 | |
|    information, see `Keyword Arguments`_ in the official Python tutorial.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    .. _`Keyword Arguments`: http://docs.python.org/tutorial/controlflow.html#keyword-arguments
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.4
 | |
|     The field specified in a lookup has to be the name of a model field.
 | |
|     There's one exception though, in case of a
 | |
|     :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` you can specify the field
 | |
|     name suffixed with ``_id``. In this case, the value parameter is expected
 | |
|     to contain the raw value of the foreign model's primary key. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog_id__exact=4)
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you pass an invalid keyword argument, a lookup function will raise
 | |
| ``TypeError``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The database API supports about two dozen lookup types; a complete reference
 | |
| can be found in the :ref:`field lookup reference <field-lookups>`. To give you
 | |
| a taste of what's available, here's some of the more common lookups you'll
 | |
| probably use:
 | |
| 
 | |
| :lookup:`exact`
 | |
|     An "exact" match. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> Entry.objects.get(headline__exact="Man bites dog")
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Would generate SQL along these lines:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|         SELECT ... WHERE headline = 'Man bites dog';
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If you don't provide a lookup type -- that is, if your keyword argument
 | |
|     doesn't contain a double underscore -- the lookup type is assumed to be
 | |
|     ``exact``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     For example, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14)  # Explicit form
 | |
|         >>> Blog.objects.get(id=14)         # __exact is implied
 | |
| 
 | |
|     This is for convenience, because ``exact`` lookups are the common case.
 | |
| 
 | |
| :lookup:`iexact`
 | |
|     A case-insensitive match. So, the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> Blog.objects.get(name__iexact="beatles blog")
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Would match a ``Blog`` titled "Beatles Blog", "beatles blog", or even
 | |
|     "BeAtlES blOG".
 | |
| 
 | |
| :lookup:`contains`
 | |
|     Case-sensitive containment test. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Entry.objects.get(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Roughly translates to this SQL:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|         SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%Lennon%';
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Note this will match the headline ``'Today Lennon honored'`` but not
 | |
|     ``'today lennon honored'``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     There's also a case-insensitive version, :lookup:`icontains`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| :lookup:`startswith`, :lookup:`endswith`
 | |
|     Starts-with and ends-with search, respectively. There are also
 | |
|     case-insensitive versions called :lookup:`istartswith` and
 | |
|     :lookup:`iendswith`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Again, this only scratches the surface. A complete reference can be found in the
 | |
| :ref:`field lookup reference <field-lookups>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _lookups-that-span-relationships:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookups that span relationships
 | |
| -------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django offers a powerful and intuitive way to "follow" relationships in
 | |
| lookups, taking care of the SQL ``JOIN``\s for you automatically, behind the
 | |
| scenes. To span a relationship, just use the field name of related fields
 | |
| across models, separated by double underscores, until you get to the field you
 | |
| want.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Entry`` objects with a ``Blog`` whose ``name``
 | |
| is ``'Beatles Blog'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__name__exact='Beatles Blog')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This spanning can be as deep as you'd like.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It works backwards, too. To refer to a "reverse" relationship, just use the
 | |
| lowercase name of the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example retrieves all ``Blog`` objects which have at least one ``Entry``
 | |
| whose ``headline`` contains ``'Lennon'``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you are filtering across multiple relationships and one of the intermediate
 | |
| models doesn't have a value that meets the filter condition, Django will treat
 | |
| it as if there is an empty (all values are ``NULL``), but valid, object there.
 | |
| All this means is that no error will be raised. For example, in this filter::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__name='Lennon')
 | |
| 
 | |
| (if there was a related ``Author`` model), if there was no ``author``
 | |
| associated with an entry, it would be treated as if there was also no ``name``
 | |
| attached, rather than raising an error because of the missing ``author``.
 | |
| Usually this is exactly what you want to have happen. The only case where it
 | |
| might be confusing is if you are using :lookup:`isnull`. Thus::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__name__isnull=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| will return ``Blog`` objects that have an empty ``name`` on the ``author`` and
 | |
| also those which have an empty ``author`` on the ``entry``. If you don't want
 | |
| those latter objects, you could write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__authors__isnull=False,
 | |
|             entry__authors__name__isnull=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Spanning multi-valued relationships
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you are filtering an object based on a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` or a reverse
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`, there are two different sorts of filter
 | |
| you may be interested in. Consider the ``Blog``/``Entry`` relationship
 | |
| (``Blog`` to ``Entry`` is a one-to-many relation). We might be interested in
 | |
| finding blogs that have an entry which has both *"Lennon"* in the headline and
 | |
| was published in 2008. Or we might want to find blogs that have an entry with
 | |
| *"Lennon"* in the headline as well as an entry that was published
 | |
| in 2008. Since there are multiple entries associated with a single ``Blog``,
 | |
| both of these queries are possible and make sense in some situations.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The same type of situation arises with a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`. For example, if an ``Entry`` has a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` called ``tags``, we might want to
 | |
| find entries linked to tags called *"music"* and *"bands"* or we might want an
 | |
| entry that contains a tag with a name of *"music"* and a status of *"public"*.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To handle both of these situations, Django has a consistent way of processing
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` and
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude` calls. Everything inside a
 | |
| single :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` call is applied
 | |
| simultaneously to filter out items matching all those requirements. Successive
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` calls further restrict the set
 | |
| of objects, but for multi-valued relations, they apply to any object linked to
 | |
| the primary model, not necessarily those objects that were selected by an
 | |
| earlier :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` call.
 | |
| 
 | |
| That may sound a bit confusing, so hopefully an example will clarify. To
 | |
| select all blogs that contain entries with both *"Lennon"* in the headline
 | |
| and that were published in 2008 (the same entry satisfying both conditions),
 | |
| we would write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon',
 | |
|             entry__pub_date__year=2008)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To select all blogs that contain an entry with *"Lennon"* in the headline
 | |
| **as well as** an entry that was published in 2008, we would write::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Blog.objects.filter(entry__headline__contains='Lennon').filter(
 | |
|             entry__pub_date__year=2008)
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this second example, the first filter restricted the queryset to all those
 | |
| blogs linked to that particular type of entry. The second filter restricted
 | |
| the set of blogs *further* to those that are also linked to the second type of
 | |
| entry. The entries select by the second filter may or may not be the same as
 | |
| the entries in the first filter. We are filtering the ``Blog`` items with each
 | |
| filter statement, not the ``Entry`` items.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All of this behavior also applies to
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude`: all the conditions in a
 | |
| single :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude` statement apply to a
 | |
| single instance (if those conditions are talking about the same multi-valued
 | |
| relation). Conditions in subsequent
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter` or
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude` calls that refer to the same
 | |
| relation may end up filtering on different linked objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _query-expressions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Filters can reference fields on the model
 | |
| -----------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the examples given so far, we have constructed filters that compare
 | |
| the value of a model field with a constant. But what if you want to compare
 | |
| the value of a model field with another field on the same model?
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django provides the :ref:`F() expressions <query-expressions>` to allow such
 | |
| comparisons. Instances of ``F()`` act as a reference to a model field within a
 | |
| query. These references can then be used in query filters to compare the values
 | |
| of two different fields on the same model instance.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, to find a list of all blog entries that have had more comments
 | |
| than pingbacks, we construct an ``F()`` object to reference the pingback count,
 | |
| and use that ``F()`` object in the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from django.db.models import F
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(n_comments__gt=F('n_pingbacks'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django supports the use of addition, subtraction, multiplication,
 | |
| division and modulo arithmetic with ``F()`` objects, both with constants
 | |
| and with other ``F()`` objects. To find all the blog entries with more than
 | |
| *twice* as many comments as pingbacks, we modify the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(n_comments__gt=F('n_pingbacks') * 2)
 | |
| 
 | |
| To find all the entries where the rating of the entry is less than the
 | |
| sum of the pingback count and comment count, we would issue the
 | |
| query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(rating__lt=F('n_comments') + F('n_pingbacks'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also use the double underscore notation to span relationships in
 | |
| an ``F()`` object. An ``F()`` object with a double underscore will introduce
 | |
| any joins needed to access the related object. For example, to retrieve all
 | |
| the entries where the author's name is the same as the blog name, we could
 | |
| issue the query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(authors__name=F('blog__name'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.3
 | |
| 
 | |
| For date and date/time fields, you can add or subtract a
 | |
| :class:`~datetime.timedelta` object. The following would return all entries
 | |
| that were modified more than 3 days after they were published::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from datetime import timedelta
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(mod_date__gt=F('pub_date') + timedelta(days=3))
 | |
| 
 | |
| The pk lookup shortcut
 | |
| ----------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| For convenience, Django provides a ``pk`` lookup shortcut, which stands for
 | |
| "primary key".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the example ``Blog`` model, the primary key is the ``id`` field, so these
 | |
| three statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(id__exact=14) # Explicit form
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(id=14) # __exact is implied
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.get(pk=14) # pk implies id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| The use of ``pk`` isn't limited to ``__exact`` queries -- any query term
 | |
| can be combined with ``pk`` to perform a query on the primary key of a model::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get blogs entries with id 1, 4 and 7
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(pk__in=[1,4,7])
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Get all blog entries with id > 14
 | |
|     >>> Blog.objects.filter(pk__gt=14)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``pk`` lookups also work across joins. For example, these three statements are
 | |
| equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__id__exact=3) # Explicit form
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__id=3)        # __exact is implied
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(blog__pk=3)        # __pk implies __id__exact
 | |
| 
 | |
| Escaping percent signs and underscores in LIKE statements
 | |
| ---------------------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The field lookups that equate to ``LIKE`` SQL statements (``iexact``,
 | |
| ``contains``, ``icontains``, ``startswith``, ``istartswith``, ``endswith``
 | |
| and ``iendswith``) will automatically escape the two special characters used in
 | |
| ``LIKE`` statements -- the percent sign and the underscore. (In a ``LIKE``
 | |
| statement, the percent sign signifies a multiple-character wildcard and the
 | |
| underscore signifies a single-character wildcard.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means things should work intuitively, so the abstraction doesn't leak.
 | |
| For example, to retrieve all the entries that contain a percent sign, just use
 | |
| the percent sign as any other character::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.filter(headline__contains='%')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django takes care of the quoting for you; the resulting SQL will look something
 | |
| like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: sql
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT ... WHERE headline LIKE '%\%%';
 | |
| 
 | |
| Same goes for underscores. Both percentage signs and underscores are handled
 | |
| for you transparently.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _caching-and-querysets:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Caching and QuerySets
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` contains a cache, to minimize
 | |
| database access. It's important to understand how it works, in order to write
 | |
| the most efficient code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a newly created :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`, the cache is
 | |
| empty. The first time a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` is evaluated
 | |
| -- and, hence, a database query happens -- Django saves the query results in
 | |
| the :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`\'s cache and returns the results
 | |
| that have been explicitly requested (e.g., the next element, if the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` is being iterated over). Subsequent
 | |
| evaluations of the :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` reuse the cached
 | |
| results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keep this caching behavior in mind, because it may bite you if you don't use
 | |
| your :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`\s correctly. For example, the
 | |
| following will create two :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`\s, evaluate
 | |
| them, and throw them away::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> print([e.headline for e in Entry.objects.all()])
 | |
|     >>> print([e.pub_date for e in Entry.objects.all()])
 | |
| 
 | |
| That means the same database query will be executed twice, effectively doubling
 | |
| your database load. Also, there's a possibility the two lists may not include
 | |
| the same database records, because an ``Entry`` may have been added or deleted
 | |
| in the split second between the two requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To avoid this problem, simply save the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` and reuse it::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> queryset = Entry.objects.all()
 | |
|     >>> print([p.headline for p in queryset]) # Evaluate the query set.
 | |
|     >>> print([p.pub_date for p in queryset]) # Re-use the cache from the evaluation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _complex-lookups-with-q:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Complex lookups with Q objects
 | |
| ==============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keyword argument queries -- in :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter`,
 | |
| etc. -- are "AND"ed together. If you need to execute more complex queries (for
 | |
| example, queries with ``OR`` statements), you can use ``Q`` objects.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. comment: Link to Q does not work, since this documentation does not exist yet.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A :class:`~django.db.models.Q` object (``django.db.models.Q``) is an object
 | |
| used to encapsulate a collection of keyword arguments. These keyword arguments
 | |
| are specified as in "Field lookups" above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this ``Q`` object encapsulates a single ``LIKE`` query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.db.models import Q
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``Q`` objects can be combined using the ``&`` and ``|`` operators. When an
 | |
| operator is used on two ``Q`` objects, it yields a new ``Q`` object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this statement yields a single ``Q`` object that represents the
 | |
| "OR" of two ``"question__startswith"`` queries::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='Who') | Q(question__startswith='What')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is equivalent to the following SQL ``WHERE`` clause::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     WHERE question LIKE 'Who%' OR question LIKE 'What%'
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can compose statements of arbitrary complexity by combining ``Q`` objects
 | |
| with the ``&`` and ``|`` operators and use parenthetical grouping. Also, ``Q``
 | |
| objects can be negated using the ``~`` operator, allowing for combined lookups
 | |
| that combine both a normal query and a negated (``NOT``) query::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Q(question__startswith='Who') | ~Q(pub_date__year=2005)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each lookup function that takes keyword-arguments
 | |
| (e.g. :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.filter`,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.exclude`,
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.get`) can also be passed one or more
 | |
| ``Q`` objects as positional (not-named) arguments. If you provide multiple
 | |
| ``Q`` object arguments to a lookup function, the arguments will be "AND"ed
 | |
| together. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(question__startswith='Who'),
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6))
 | |
|     )
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... roughly translates into the SQL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     SELECT * from polls WHERE question LIKE 'Who%'
 | |
|         AND (pub_date = '2005-05-02' OR pub_date = '2005-05-06')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Lookup functions can mix the use of ``Q`` objects and keyword arguments. All
 | |
| arguments provided to a lookup function (be they keyword arguments or ``Q``
 | |
| objects) are "AND"ed together. However, if a ``Q`` object is provided, it must
 | |
| precede the definition of any keyword arguments. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)),
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who')
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would be a valid query, equivalent to the previous example; but::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # INVALID QUERY
 | |
|     Poll.objects.get(
 | |
|         question__startswith='Who',
 | |
|         Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 2)) | Q(pub_date=date(2005, 5, 6)))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ... would not be valid.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The `OR lookups examples`_ in the Django unit tests show some possible uses
 | |
|     of ``Q``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. _OR lookups examples: https://github.com/django/django/blob/master/tests/modeltests/or_lookups/tests.py
 | |
| 
 | |
| Comparing objects
 | |
| =================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To compare two model instances, just use the standard Python comparison operator,
 | |
| the double equals sign: ``==``. Behind the scenes, that compares the primary
 | |
| key values of two models.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the ``Entry`` example above, the following two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> some_entry == other_entry
 | |
|     >>> some_entry.id == other_entry.id
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model's primary key isn't called ``id``, no problem. Comparisons will
 | |
| always use the primary key, whatever it's called. For example, if a model's
 | |
| primary key field is called ``name``, these two statements are equivalent::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> some_obj == other_obj
 | |
|     >>> some_obj.name == other_obj.name
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-delete:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Deleting objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| The delete method, conveniently, is named
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.delete`. This method immediately deletes the
 | |
| object and has no return value. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also delete objects in bulk. Every
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` has a
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.delete` method, which deletes all
 | |
| members of that :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, this deletes all ``Entry`` objects with a ``pub_date`` year of
 | |
| 2005::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2005).delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Keep in mind that this will, whenever possible, be executed purely in SQL, and
 | |
| so the ``delete()`` methods of individual object instances will not necessarily
 | |
| be called during the process. If you've provided a custom ``delete()`` method
 | |
| on a model class and want to ensure that it is called, you will need to
 | |
| "manually" delete instances of that model (e.g., by iterating over a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` and calling ``delete()`` on each
 | |
| object individually) rather than using the bulk
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.delete` method of a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When Django deletes an object, by default it emulates the behavior of the SQL
 | |
| constraint ``ON DELETE CASCADE`` -- in other words, any objects which had
 | |
| foreign keys pointing at the object to be deleted will be deleted along with
 | |
| it. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
|     # This will delete the Blog and all of its Entry objects.
 | |
|     b.delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.3
 | |
|     This cascade behavior is customizable via the
 | |
|     :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.on_delete` argument to the
 | |
|     :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.delete` is the only
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` method that is not exposed on a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` itself. This is a safety mechanism to
 | |
| prevent you from accidentally requesting ``Entry.objects.delete()``, and
 | |
| deleting *all* the entries. If you *do* want to delete all the objects, then
 | |
| you have to explicitly request a complete query set::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.all().delete()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-copy:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Copying model instances
 | |
| =======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Although there is no built-in method for copying model instances, it is
 | |
| possible to easily create new instance with all fields' values copied. In the
 | |
| simplest case, you can just set ``pk`` to ``None``. Using our blog example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     blog = Blog(name='My blog', tagline='Blogging is easy')
 | |
|     blog.save() # post.pk == 1
 | |
| 
 | |
|     blog.pk = None
 | |
|     blog.save() # post.pk == 2
 | |
| 
 | |
| Things get more complicated if you use inheritance. Consider a subclass of
 | |
| ``Blog``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class ThemeBlog(Blog):
 | |
|         theme = models.CharField(max_length=200)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     django_blog = ThemeBlog(name='Django', tagline='Django is easy', theme = 'python')
 | |
|     django_blog.save() # django_blog.pk == 3
 | |
| 
 | |
| Due to how inheritance works, you have to set both ``pk`` and ``id`` to None::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     django_blog.pk = None
 | |
|     django_blog.id = None
 | |
|     django_blog.save() # django_blog.pk == 4
 | |
| 
 | |
| This process does not copy related objects. If you want to copy relations,
 | |
| you have to write a little bit more code. In our example, ``Entry`` has a many to many
 | |
| field to ``Author``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     entry = Entry.objects.all()[0] # some previous entry
 | |
|     old_authors = entry.authors.all()
 | |
|     entry.pk = None
 | |
|     entry.save()
 | |
|     entry.authors = old_authors # saves new many2many relations
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-update:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating multiple objects at once
 | |
| =================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes you want to set a field to a particular value for all the objects in
 | |
| a :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet`. You can do this with the
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.update` method. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Update all the headlines with pub_date in 2007.
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(pub_date__year=2007).update(headline='Everything is the same')
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can only set non-relation fields and :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`
 | |
| fields using this method. To update a non-relation field, provide the new value
 | |
| as a constant. To update :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` fields, set the
 | |
| new value to be the new model instance you want to point to. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Change every Entry so that it belongs to this Blog.
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all().update(blog=b)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``update()`` method is applied instantly and returns the number of rows
 | |
| affected by the query. The only restriction on the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` that is updated is that it can only
 | |
| access one database table, the model's main table. You can filter based on
 | |
| related fields, but you can only update columns in the model's main
 | |
| table. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(pk=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Update all the headlines belonging to this Blog.
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.select_related().filter(blog=b).update(headline='Everything is the same')
 | |
| 
 | |
| Be aware that the ``update()`` method is converted directly to an SQL
 | |
| statement. It is a bulk operation for direct updates. It doesn't run any
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` methods on your models, or emit the
 | |
| ``pre_save`` or ``post_save`` signals (which are a consequence of calling
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`). If you want to save every item in a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` and make sure that the
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save` method is called on each instance, you
 | |
| don't need any special function to handle that. Just loop over them and call
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     for item in my_queryset:
 | |
|         item.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Calls to update can also use :ref:`F() objects <query-expressions>` to update
 | |
| one field based on the value of another field in the model. This is especially
 | |
| useful for incrementing counters based upon their current value. For example, to
 | |
| increment the pingback count for every entry in the blog::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.all().update(n_pingbacks=F('n_pingbacks') + 1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, unlike ``F()`` objects in filter and exclude clauses, you can't
 | |
| introduce joins when you use ``F()`` objects in an update -- you can only
 | |
| reference fields local to the model being updated. If you attempt to introduce
 | |
| a join with an ``F()`` object, a ``FieldError`` will be raised::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # THIS WILL RAISE A FieldError
 | |
|     >>> Entry.objects.update(headline=F('blog__name'))
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-db-queries-related:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Related objects
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you define a relationship in a model (i.e., a
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField`, or
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`), instances of that model will have
 | |
| a convenient API to access the related object(s).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using the models at the top of this page, for example, an ``Entry`` object ``e``
 | |
| can get its associated ``Blog`` object by accessing the ``blog`` attribute:
 | |
| ``e.blog``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (Behind the scenes, this functionality is implemented by Python descriptors_.
 | |
| This shouldn't really matter to you, but we point it out here for the curious.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django also creates API accessors for the "other" side of the relationship --
 | |
| the link from the related model to the model that defines the relationship.
 | |
| For example, a ``Blog`` object ``b`` has access to a list of all related
 | |
| ``Entry`` objects via the ``entry_set`` attribute: ``b.entry_set.all()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| All examples in this section use the sample ``Blog``, ``Author`` and ``Entry``
 | |
| models defined at the top of this page.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _descriptors: http://users.rcn.com/python/download/Descriptor.htm
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-many relationships
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`, instances of that model
 | |
| will have access to the related (foreign) object via a simple attribute of the
 | |
| model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog # Returns the related Blog object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can get and set via a foreign-key attribute. As you may expect, changes to
 | |
| the foreign key aren't saved to the database until you call
 | |
| :meth:`~django.db.models.Model.save`. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog = some_blog
 | |
|     >>> e.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` field has ``null=True`` set (i.e., it allows ``NULL``
 | |
| values), you can assign ``None`` to it. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> e.blog = None
 | |
|     >>> e.save() # "UPDATE blog_entry SET blog_id = NULL ...;"
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forward access to one-to-many relationships is cached the first time the
 | |
| related object is accessed. Subsequent accesses to the foreign key on the same
 | |
| object instance are cached. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> print(e.blog)  # Hits the database to retrieve the associated Blog.
 | |
|     >>> print(e.blog)  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.select_related`
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` method recursively prepopulates the
 | |
| cache of all one-to-many relationships ahead of time. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> e = Entry.objects.select_related().get(id=2)
 | |
|     >>> print(e.blog)  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
|     >>> print(e.blog)  # Doesn't hit the database; uses cached version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _backwards-related-objects:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Following relationships "backward"
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has a :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`, instances of the
 | |
| foreign-key model will have access to a :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` that
 | |
| returns all instances of the first model. By default, this
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` is named ``FOO_set``, where ``FOO`` is the
 | |
| source model name, lowercased. This :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` returns
 | |
| ``QuerySets``, which can be filtered and manipulated as described in the
 | |
| "Retrieving objects" section above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entry_set is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     >>> b.entry_set.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can override the ``FOO_set`` name by setting the ``related_name``
 | |
| parameter in the ``ForeignKey()`` definition. For example, if the ``Entry``
 | |
| model was altered to ``blog = ForeignKey(Blog, related_name='entries')``, the
 | |
| above example code would look like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.all() # Returns all Entry objects related to Blog.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # b.entries is a Manager that returns QuerySets.
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.filter(headline__contains='Lennon')
 | |
|     >>> b.entries.count()
 | |
| 
 | |
| You cannot access a reverse :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` from the class; it must be accessed from an
 | |
| instance::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> Blog.entry_set
 | |
|     Traceback:
 | |
|         ...
 | |
|     AttributeError: "Manager must be accessed via instance".
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to the :class:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet` methods defined in
 | |
| "Retrieving objects" above, the :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` has additional methods used to handle the
 | |
| set of related objects. A synopsis of each is below, and complete details can
 | |
| be found in the :doc:`related objects reference </ref/models/relations>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``add(obj1, obj2, ...)``
 | |
|     Adds the specified model objects to the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``create(**kwargs)``
 | |
|     Creates a new object, saves it and puts it in the related object set.
 | |
|     Returns the newly created object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``remove(obj1, obj2, ...)``
 | |
|     Removes the specified model objects from the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``clear()``
 | |
|     Removes all objects from the related object set.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To assign the members of a related set in one fell swoop, just assign to it
 | |
| from any iterable object. The iterable can contain object instances, or just
 | |
| a list of primary key values. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b = Blog.objects.get(id=1)
 | |
|     b.entry_set = [e1, e2]
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this example, ``e1`` and ``e2`` can be full Entry instances, or integer
 | |
| primary key values.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the ``clear()`` method is available, any pre-existing objects will be
 | |
| removed from the ``entry_set`` before all objects in the iterable (in this
 | |
| case, a list) are added to the set. If the ``clear()`` method is *not*
 | |
| available, all objects in the iterable will be added without removing any
 | |
| existing elements.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each "reverse" operation described in this section has an immediate effect on
 | |
| the database. Every addition, creation and deletion is immediately and
 | |
| automatically saved to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _m2m-reverse-relationships:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Many-to-many relationships
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both ends of a many-to-many relationship get automatic API access to the other
 | |
| end. The API works just as a "backward" one-to-many relationship, above.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The only difference is in the attribute naming: The model that defines the
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` uses the attribute name of that
 | |
| field itself, whereas the "reverse" model uses the lowercased model name of the
 | |
| original model, plus ``'_set'`` (just like reverse one-to-many relationships).
 | |
| 
 | |
| An example makes this easier to understand::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=3)
 | |
|     e.authors.all() # Returns all Author objects for this Entry.
 | |
|     e.authors.count()
 | |
|     e.authors.filter(name__contains='John')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     a = Author.objects.get(id=5)
 | |
|     a.entry_set.all() # Returns all Entry objects for this Author.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Like :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
 | |
| :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` can specify ``related_name``. In the
 | |
| above example, if the :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` in ``Entry``
 | |
| had specified ``related_name='entries'``, then each ``Author`` instance would
 | |
| have an ``entries`` attribute instead of ``entry_set``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-one relationships
 | |
| ------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| One-to-one relationships are very similar to many-to-one relationships. If you
 | |
| define a :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` on your model, instances of
 | |
| that model will have access to the related object via a simple attribute of the
 | |
| model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class EntryDetail(models.Model):
 | |
|         entry = models.OneToOneField(Entry)
 | |
|         details = models.TextField()
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ed = EntryDetail.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     ed.entry # Returns the related Entry object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The difference comes in "reverse" queries. The related model in a one-to-one
 | |
| relationship also has access to a :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` object, but
 | |
| that :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` represents a single object, rather than
 | |
| a collection of objects::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e = Entry.objects.get(id=2)
 | |
|     e.entrydetail # returns the related EntryDetail object
 | |
| 
 | |
| If no object has been assigned to this relationship, Django will raise
 | |
| a ``DoesNotExist`` exception.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Instances can be assigned to the reverse relationship in the same way as
 | |
| you would assign the forward relationship::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     e.entrydetail = ed
 | |
| 
 | |
| How are the backward relationships possible?
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other object-relational mappers require you to define relationships on both
 | |
| sides. The Django developers believe this is a violation of the DRY (Don't
 | |
| Repeat Yourself) principle, so Django only requires you to define the
 | |
| relationship on one end.
 | |
| 
 | |
| But how is this possible, given that a model class doesn't know which other
 | |
| model classes are related to it until those other model classes are loaded?
 | |
| 
 | |
| The answer lies in the :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` setting. The first time any
 | |
| model is loaded, Django iterates over every model in :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`
 | |
| and creates the backward relationships in memory as needed. Essentially, one of
 | |
| the functions of :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` is to tell Django the entire model
 | |
| domain.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries over related objects
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Queries involving related objects follow the same rules as queries involving
 | |
| normal value fields. When specifying the value for a query to match, you may
 | |
| use either an object instance itself, or the primary key value for the object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, if you have a Blog object ``b`` with ``id=5``, the following
 | |
| three queries would be identical::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b) # Query using object instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=b.id) # Query using id from instance
 | |
|     Entry.objects.filter(blog=5) # Query using id directly
 | |
| 
 | |
| Falling back to raw SQL
 | |
| =======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you find yourself needing to write an SQL query that is too complex for
 | |
| Django's database-mapper to handle, you can fall back on writing SQL by hand.
 | |
| Django has a couple of options for writing raw SQL queries; see
 | |
| :doc:`/topics/db/sql`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, it's important to note that the Django database layer is merely an
 | |
| interface to your database. You can access your database via other tools,
 | |
| programming languages or database frameworks; there's nothing Django-specific
 | |
| about your database.
 |