mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-31 01:25:32 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@15055 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
		
			
				
	
	
		
			566 lines
		
	
	
		
			22 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			566 lines
		
	
	
		
			22 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ========================
 | |
| Model instance reference
 | |
| ========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.db.models
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document describes the details of the ``Model`` API. It builds on the
 | |
| material presented in the :doc:`model </topics/db/models>` and :doc:`database
 | |
| query </topics/db/queries>` guides, so you'll probably want to read and
 | |
| understand those documents before reading this one.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Throughout this reference we'll use the :ref:`example Weblog models
 | |
| <queryset-model-example>` presented in the :doc:`database query guide
 | |
| </topics/db/queries>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Creating objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| To create a new instance of a model, just instantiate it like any other Python
 | |
| class:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: Model(**kwargs)
 | |
| 
 | |
| The keyword arguments are simply the names of the fields you've defined on your
 | |
| model. Note that instantiating a model in no way touches your database; for
 | |
| that, you need to ``save()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _validating-objects:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Validating objects
 | |
| ==================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.2
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are three steps involved in validating a model:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     1. Validate the model fields
 | |
|     2. Validate the model as a whole
 | |
|     3. Validate the field uniqueness
 | |
| 
 | |
| All three steps are performed when you call by a model's
 | |
| ``full_clean()`` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you use a ``ModelForm``, the call to ``is_valid()`` will perform
 | |
| these validation steps for all the fields that are included on the
 | |
| form. (See the :doc:`ModelForm documentation
 | |
| </topics/forms/modelforms>` for more information.) You should only need
 | |
| to call a model's ``full_clean()`` method if you plan to handle
 | |
| validation errors yourself, or if you have excluded fields from the
 | |
| ModelForm that require validation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.full_clean(exclude=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method calls ``Model.clean_fields()``, ``Model.clean()``, and
 | |
| ``Model.validate_unique()``, in that order and raises a ``ValidationError``
 | |
| that has a ``message_dict`` attribute containing errors from all three stages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The optional ``exclude`` argument can be used to provide a list of field names
 | |
| that can be excluded from validation and cleaning. ``ModelForm`` uses this
 | |
| argument to exclude fields that aren't present on your form from being
 | |
| validated since any errors raised could not be corrected by the user.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that ``full_clean()`` will *not* be called automatically when you
 | |
| call your model's ``save()`` method, nor as a result of ``ModelForm``
 | |
| validation. You'll need to call it manually when you want to run model
 | |
| validation outside of a ``ModelForm``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     try:
 | |
|         article.full_clean()
 | |
|     except ValidationError, e:
 | |
|         # Do something based on the errors contained in e.message_dict.
 | |
|         # Display them to a user, or handle them programatically.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first step ``full_clean()`` performs is to clean each individual field.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.clean_fields(exclude=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method will validate all fields on your model. The optional ``exclude``
 | |
| argument lets you provide a list of field names to exclude from validation. It
 | |
| will raise a ``ValidationError`` if any fields fail validation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The second step ``full_clean()`` performs is to call ``Model.clean()``.
 | |
| This method should be overridden to perform custom validation on your model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.clean()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method should be used to provide custom model validation, and to modify
 | |
| attributes on your model if desired. For instance, you could use it to
 | |
| automatically provide a value for a field, or to do validation that requires
 | |
| access to more than a single field::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def clean(self):
 | |
|         from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError
 | |
|         # Don't allow draft entries to have a pub_date.
 | |
|         if self.status == 'draft' and self.pub_date is not None:
 | |
|             raise ValidationError('Draft entries may not have a publication date.')
 | |
|         # Set the pub_date for published items if it hasn't been set already.
 | |
|         if self.status == 'published' and self.pub_date is None:
 | |
|             self.pub_date = datetime.datetime.now()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any ``ValidationError`` raised by ``Model.clean()`` will be stored under a
 | |
| special key that is used for errors that are tied to the entire model instead
 | |
| of to a specific field. You can access these errors with ``NON_FIELD_ERRORS``::
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.core.exceptions import ValidationError, NON_FIELD_ERRORS
 | |
|     try:
 | |
|         article.full_clean()
 | |
|     except ValidationError, e:
 | |
|         non_field_errors = e.message_dict[NON_FIELD_ERRORS]
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, ``full_clean()`` will check any unique constraints on your model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.validate_unique(exclude=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
| This method is similar to ``clean_fields``, but validates all uniqueness
 | |
| constraints on your model instead of individual field values. The optional
 | |
| ``exclude`` argument allows you to provide a list of field names to exclude
 | |
| from validation. It will raise a ``ValidationError`` if any fields fail
 | |
| validation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that if you provide an ``exclude`` argument to ``validate_unique``, any
 | |
| ``unique_together`` constraint that contains one of the fields you provided
 | |
| will not be checked.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Saving objects
 | |
| ==============
 | |
| 
 | |
| To save an object back to the database, call ``save()``:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.save([force_insert=False, force_update=False, using=DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS])
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.2
 | |
|    The ``using`` argument was added.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want customized saving behavior, you can override this
 | |
| ``save()`` method. See :ref:`overriding-model-methods` for more
 | |
| details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The model save process also has some subtleties; see the sections
 | |
| below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Auto-incrementing primary keys
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has an ``AutoField`` -- an auto-incrementing primary key -- then
 | |
| that auto-incremented value will be calculated and saved as an attribute on
 | |
| your object the first time you call ``save()``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b2 = Blog(name='Cheddar Talk', tagline='Thoughts on cheese.')
 | |
|     >>> b2.id     # Returns None, because b doesn't have an ID yet.
 | |
|     >>> b2.save()
 | |
|     >>> b2.id     # Returns the ID of your new object.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There's no way to tell what the value of an ID will be before you call
 | |
| ``save()``, because that value is calculated by your database, not by Django.
 | |
| 
 | |
| (For convenience, each model has an ``AutoField`` named ``id`` by default
 | |
| unless you explicitly specify ``primary_key=True`` on a field. See the
 | |
| documentation for ``AutoField`` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``pk`` property
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: Model.pk
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regardless of whether you define a primary key field yourself, or let Django
 | |
| supply one for you, each model will have a property called ``pk``. It behaves
 | |
| like a normal attribute on the model, but is actually an alias for whichever
 | |
| attribute is the primary key field for the model. You can read and set this
 | |
| value, just as you would for any other attribute, and it will update the
 | |
| correct field in the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Explicitly specifying auto-primary-key values
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a model has an ``AutoField`` but you want to define a new object's ID
 | |
| explicitly when saving, just define it explicitly before saving, rather than
 | |
| relying on the auto-assignment of the ID::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> b3 = Blog(id=3, name='Cheddar Talk', tagline='Thoughts on cheese.')
 | |
|     >>> b3.id     # Returns 3.
 | |
|     >>> b3.save()
 | |
|     >>> b3.id     # Returns 3.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you assign auto-primary-key values manually, make sure not to use an
 | |
| already-existing primary-key value! If you create a new object with an explicit
 | |
| primary-key value that already exists in the database, Django will assume you're
 | |
| changing the existing record rather than creating a new one.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Given the above ``'Cheddar Talk'`` blog example, this example would override the
 | |
| previous record in the database::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     b4 = Blog(id=3, name='Not Cheddar', tagline='Anything but cheese.')
 | |
|     b4.save()  # Overrides the previous blog with ID=3!
 | |
| 
 | |
| See `How Django knows to UPDATE vs. INSERT`_, below, for the reason this
 | |
| happens.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Explicitly specifying auto-primary-key values is mostly useful for bulk-saving
 | |
| objects, when you're confident you won't have primary-key collision.
 | |
| 
 | |
| What happens when you save?
 | |
| ---------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you save an object, Django performs the following steps:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     1. **Emit a pre-save signal.** The :doc:`signal </ref/signals>`
 | |
|        :attr:`django.db.models.signals.pre_save` is sent, allowing any
 | |
|        functions listening for that signal to take some customized
 | |
|        action.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     2. **Pre-process the data.** Each field on the object is asked to
 | |
|        perform any automated data modification that the field may need
 | |
|        to perform.
 | |
| 
 | |
|        Most fields do *no* pre-processing -- the field data is kept as-is.
 | |
|        Pre-processing is only used on fields that have special behavior.
 | |
|        For example, if your model has a ``DateField`` with ``auto_now=True``,
 | |
|        the pre-save phase will alter the data in the object to ensure that
 | |
|        the date field contains the current date stamp. (Our documentation
 | |
|        doesn't yet include a list of all the fields with this "special
 | |
|        behavior.")
 | |
| 
 | |
|     3. **Prepare the data for the database.** Each field is asked to provide
 | |
|        its current value in a data type that can be written to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
|        Most fields require *no* data preparation. Simple data types, such as
 | |
|        integers and strings, are 'ready to write' as a Python object. However,
 | |
|        more complex data types often require some modification.
 | |
| 
 | |
|        For example, ``DateFields`` use a Python ``datetime`` object to store
 | |
|        data. Databases don't store ``datetime`` objects, so the field value
 | |
|        must be converted into an ISO-compliant date string for insertion
 | |
|        into the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     4. **Insert the data into the database.** The pre-processed, prepared
 | |
|        data is then composed into an SQL statement for insertion into the
 | |
|        database.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     5. **Emit a post-save signal.** The signal
 | |
|        :attr:`django.db.models.signals.post_save` is sent, allowing
 | |
|        any functions listening for that signal to take some customized
 | |
|        action.
 | |
| 
 | |
| How Django knows to UPDATE vs. INSERT
 | |
| -------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| You may have noticed Django database objects use the same ``save()`` method
 | |
| for creating and changing objects. Django abstracts the need to use ``INSERT``
 | |
| or ``UPDATE`` SQL statements. Specifically, when you call ``save()``, Django
 | |
| follows this algorithm:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * If the object's primary key attribute is set to a value that evaluates to
 | |
|       ``True`` (i.e., a value other than ``None`` or the empty string), Django
 | |
|       executes a ``SELECT`` query to determine whether a record with the given
 | |
|       primary key already exists.
 | |
|     * If the record with the given primary key does already exist, Django
 | |
|       executes an ``UPDATE`` query.
 | |
|     * If the object's primary key attribute is *not* set, or if it's set but a
 | |
|       record doesn't exist, Django executes an ``INSERT``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The one gotcha here is that you should be careful not to specify a primary-key
 | |
| value explicitly when saving new objects, if you cannot guarantee the
 | |
| primary-key value is unused. For more on this nuance, see `Explicitly specifying
 | |
| auto-primary-key values`_ above and `Forcing an INSERT or UPDATE`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _ref-models-force-insert:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Forcing an INSERT or UPDATE
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| In some rare circumstances, it's necessary to be able to force the ``save()``
 | |
| method to perform an SQL ``INSERT`` and not fall back to doing an ``UPDATE``.
 | |
| Or vice-versa: update, if possible, but not insert a new row. In these cases
 | |
| you can pass the ``force_insert=True`` or ``force_update=True`` parameters to
 | |
| the ``save()`` method. Passing both parameters is an error, since you cannot
 | |
| both insert *and* update at the same time.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It should be very rare that you'll need to use these parameters. Django will
 | |
| almost always do the right thing and trying to override that will lead to
 | |
| errors that are difficult to track down. This feature is for advanced use
 | |
| only.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Updating attributes based on existing fields
 | |
| --------------------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes you'll need to perform a simple arithmetic task on a field, such
 | |
| as incrementing or decrementing the current value. The obvious way to
 | |
| achieve this is to do something like::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> product = Product.objects.get(name='Venezuelan Beaver Cheese')
 | |
|     >>> product.number_sold += 1
 | |
|     >>> product.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| If the old ``number_sold`` value retrieved from the database was 10, then
 | |
| the value of 11 will be written back to the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This can be optimized slightly by expressing the update relative to the
 | |
| original field value, rather than as an explicit assignment of a new value.
 | |
| Django provides :ref:`F() expressions <query-expressions>` as a way of
 | |
| performing this kind of relative update. Using ``F()`` expressions, the
 | |
| previous example would be expressed as::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from django.db.models import F
 | |
|     >>> product = Product.objects.get(name='Venezuelan Beaver Cheese')
 | |
|     >>> product.number_sold = F('number_sold') + 1
 | |
|     >>> product.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This approach doesn't use the initial value from the database. Instead, it
 | |
| makes the database do the update based on whatever value is current at the
 | |
| time that the save() is executed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once the object has been saved, you must reload the object in order to access
 | |
| the actual value that was applied to the updated field::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> product = Products.objects.get(pk=product.pk)
 | |
|     >>> print product.number_sold
 | |
|     42
 | |
| 
 | |
| For more details, see the documentation on :ref:`F() expressions
 | |
| <query-expressions>` and their :ref:`use in update queries
 | |
| <topics-db-queries-update>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Deleting objects
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.delete([using=DEFAULT_DB_ALIAS])
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionadded:: 1.2
 | |
|    The ``using`` argument was added.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Issues a SQL ``DELETE`` for the object. This only deletes the object
 | |
| in the database; the Python instance will still be around, and will
 | |
| still have data in its fields.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For more details, including how to delete objects in bulk, see
 | |
| :ref:`topics-db-queries-delete`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want customized deletion behavior, you can override this
 | |
| ``delete()`` method. See :ref:`overriding-model-methods` for more
 | |
| details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _model-instance-methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other model instance methods
 | |
| ============================
 | |
| 
 | |
| A few object methods have special purposes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``__str__``
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.__str__()
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``__str__()`` is a Python "magic method" that defines what should be returned
 | |
| if you call ``str()`` on the object. Django uses ``str(obj)`` (or the related
 | |
| function, ``unicode(obj)`` -- see below) in a number of places, most notably
 | |
| as the value displayed to render an object in the Django admin site and as the
 | |
| value inserted into a template when it displays an object. Thus, you should
 | |
| always return a nice, human-readable string for the object's ``__str__``.
 | |
| Although this isn't required, it's strongly encouraged (see the description of
 | |
| ``__unicode__``, below, before putting ``__str__`` methods everywhere).
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Person(models.Model):
 | |
|         first_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
|         last_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __str__(self):
 | |
|             # Note use of django.utils.encoding.smart_str() here because
 | |
|             # first_name and last_name will be unicode strings.
 | |
|             return smart_str('%s %s' % (self.first_name, self.last_name))
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``__unicode__``
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.__unicode__()
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``__unicode__()`` method is called whenever you call ``unicode()`` on an
 | |
| object. Since Django's database backends will return Unicode strings in your
 | |
| model's attributes, you would normally want to write a ``__unicode__()``
 | |
| method for your model. The example in the previous section could be written
 | |
| more simply as::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class Person(models.Model):
 | |
|         first_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
|         last_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def __unicode__(self):
 | |
|             return u'%s %s' % (self.first_name, self.last_name)
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you define a ``__unicode__()`` method on your model and not a ``__str__()``
 | |
| method, Django will automatically provide you with a ``__str__()`` that calls
 | |
| ``__unicode__()`` and then converts the result correctly to a UTF-8 encoded
 | |
| string object. This is recommended development practice: define only
 | |
| ``__unicode__()`` and let Django take care of the conversion to string objects
 | |
| when required.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``get_absolute_url``
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.get_absolute_url()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Define a ``get_absolute_url()`` method to tell Django how to calculate the
 | |
| URL for an object. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def get_absolute_url(self):
 | |
|         return "/people/%i/" % self.id
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django uses this in its admin interface. If an object defines
 | |
| ``get_absolute_url()``, the object-editing page will have a "View on site"
 | |
| link that will jump you directly to the object's public view, according to
 | |
| ``get_absolute_url()``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Also, a couple of other bits of Django, such as the :doc:`syndication feed
 | |
| framework </ref/contrib/syndication>`, use ``get_absolute_url()`` as a
 | |
| convenience to reward people who've defined the method.
 | |
| 
 | |
| It's good practice to use ``get_absolute_url()`` in templates, instead of
 | |
| hard-coding your objects' URLs. For example, this template code is bad::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     <a href="/people/{{ object.id }}/">{{ object.name }}</a>
 | |
| 
 | |
| But this template code is good::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     <a href="{{ object.get_absolute_url }}">{{ object.name }}</a>
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
|     The string you return from ``get_absolute_url()`` must contain only ASCII
 | |
|     characters (required by the URI spec, `RFC 2396`_) that have been
 | |
|     URL-encoded, if necessary. Code and templates using ``get_absolute_url()``
 | |
|     should be able to use the result directly without needing to do any
 | |
|     further processing. You may wish to use the
 | |
|     ``django.utils.encoding.iri_to_uri()`` function to help with this if you
 | |
|     are using unicode strings a lot.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _RFC 2396: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``permalink`` decorator
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The problem with the way we wrote ``get_absolute_url()`` above is that it
 | |
| slightly violates the DRY principle: the URL for this object is defined both
 | |
| in the URLconf file and in the model.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can further decouple your models from the URLconf using the ``permalink``
 | |
| decorator:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: permalink()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This decorator is passed the view function, a list of positional parameters and
 | |
| (optionally) a dictionary of named parameters. Django then works out the correct
 | |
| full URL path using the URLconf, substituting the parameters you have given into
 | |
| the URL. For example, if your URLconf contained a line such as::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     (r'^people/(\d+)/$', 'people.views.details'),
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...your model could have a ``get_absolute_url`` method that looked like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.db import models
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @models.permalink
 | |
|     def get_absolute_url(self):
 | |
|         return ('people.views.details', [str(self.id)])
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly, if you had a URLconf entry that looked like::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     (r'/archive/(?P<year>\d{4})/(?P<month>\d{1,2})/(?P<day>\d{1,2})/$', archive_view)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...you could reference this using ``permalink()`` as follows::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @models.permalink
 | |
|     def get_absolute_url(self):
 | |
|         return ('archive_view', (), {
 | |
|             'year': self.created.year,
 | |
|             'month': self.created.month,
 | |
|             'day': self.created.day})
 | |
| 
 | |
| Notice that we specify an empty sequence for the second parameter in this case,
 | |
| because we only want to pass keyword parameters, not positional ones.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In this way, you're tying the model's absolute path to the view that is used
 | |
| to display it, without repeating the URL information anywhere. You can still
 | |
| use the ``get_absolute_url`` method in templates, as before.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In some cases, such as the use of generic views or the re-use of
 | |
| custom views for multiple models, specifying the view function may
 | |
| confuse the reverse URL matcher (because multiple patterns point to
 | |
| the same view).
 | |
| 
 | |
| For that problem, Django has **named URL patterns**. Using a named
 | |
| URL pattern, it's possible to give a name to a pattern, and then
 | |
| reference the name rather than the view function. A named URL
 | |
| pattern is defined by replacing the pattern tuple by a call to
 | |
| the ``url`` function)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.conf.urls.defaults import *
 | |
| 
 | |
|     url(r'^people/(\d+)/$',
 | |
|         'django.views.generic.list_detail.object_detail',
 | |
|         name='people_view'),
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...and then using that name to perform the reverse URL resolution instead
 | |
| of the view name::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.db import models
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @models.permalink
 | |
|     def get_absolute_url(self):
 | |
|         return ('people_view', [str(self.id)])
 | |
| 
 | |
| More details on named URL patterns are in the :doc:`URL dispatch documentation
 | |
| </topics/http/urls>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Extra instance methods
 | |
| ======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition to ``save()``, ``delete()``, a model object might get any or all
 | |
| of the following methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.get_FOO_display()
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every field that has ``choices`` set, the object will have a
 | |
| ``get_FOO_display()`` method, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This
 | |
| method returns the "human-readable" value of the field. For example, in the
 | |
| following model::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     GENDER_CHOICES = (
 | |
|         ('M', 'Male'),
 | |
|         ('F', 'Female'),
 | |
|     )
 | |
|     class Person(models.Model):
 | |
|         name = models.CharField(max_length=20)
 | |
|         gender = models.CharField(max_length=1, choices=GENDER_CHOICES)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...each ``Person`` instance will have a ``get_gender_display()`` method. Example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> p = Person(name='John', gender='M')
 | |
|     >>> p.save()
 | |
|     >>> p.gender
 | |
|     'M'
 | |
|     >>> p.get_gender_display()
 | |
|     'Male'
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: Model.get_next_by_FOO(\**kwargs)
 | |
| .. method:: Model.get_previous_by_FOO(\**kwargs)
 | |
| 
 | |
| For every ``DateField`` and ``DateTimeField`` that does not have ``null=True``,
 | |
| the object will have ``get_next_by_FOO()`` and ``get_previous_by_FOO()``
 | |
| methods, where ``FOO`` is the name of the field. This returns the next and
 | |
| previous object with respect to the date field, raising the appropriate
 | |
| ``DoesNotExist`` exception when appropriate.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both methods accept optional keyword arguments, which should be in the format
 | |
| described in :ref:`Field lookups <field-lookups>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that in the case of identical date values, these methods will use the ID
 | |
| as a fallback check. This guarantees that no records are skipped or duplicated.
 | |
| 
 | |
| That also means you cannot use those methods on unsaved objects.
 |