mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2025-10-26 07:06:08 +00:00
372 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
372 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
======================
|
||
Model ``Meta`` options
|
||
======================
|
||
|
||
This document explains all the possible :ref:`metadata options
|
||
<meta-options>` that you can give your model in its internal
|
||
``class Meta``.
|
||
|
||
Available ``Meta`` options
|
||
==========================
|
||
|
||
.. currentmodule:: django.db.models
|
||
|
||
``abstract``
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.abstract
|
||
|
||
If ``abstract = True``, this model will be an
|
||
:ref:`abstract base class <abstract-base-classes>`.
|
||
|
||
``app_label``
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.app_label
|
||
|
||
If a model exists outside of the standard locations (:file:`models.py` or
|
||
a ``models`` package in an app), the model must define which app it is part
|
||
of::
|
||
|
||
app_label = 'myapp'
|
||
|
||
.. versionadded:: 1.7
|
||
|
||
``app_label`` is no longer required for models that are defined
|
||
outside the ``models`` module of an application.
|
||
|
||
``db_table``
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.db_table
|
||
|
||
The name of the database table to use for the model::
|
||
|
||
db_table = 'music_album'
|
||
|
||
.. _table-names:
|
||
|
||
Table names
|
||
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
||
To save you time, Django automatically derives the name of the database table
|
||
from the name of your model class and the app that contains it. A model's
|
||
database table name is constructed by joining the model's "app label" -- the
|
||
name you used in :djadmin:`manage.py startapp <startapp>` -- to the model's
|
||
class name, with an underscore between them.
|
||
|
||
For example, if you have an app ``bookstore`` (as created by
|
||
``manage.py startapp bookstore``), a model defined as ``class Book`` will have
|
||
a database table named ``bookstore_book``.
|
||
|
||
To override the database table name, use the ``db_table`` parameter in
|
||
``class Meta``.
|
||
|
||
If your database table name is an SQL reserved word, or contains characters that
|
||
aren't allowed in Python variable names -- notably, the hyphen -- that's OK.
|
||
Django quotes column and table names behind the scenes.
|
||
|
||
.. admonition:: Use lowercase table names for MySQL
|
||
|
||
It is strongly advised that you use lowercase table names when you override
|
||
the table name via ``db_table``, particularly if you are using the MySQL
|
||
backend. See the :ref:`MySQL notes <mysql-notes>` for more details.
|
||
|
||
.. admonition:: Table name quoting for Oracle
|
||
|
||
In order to meet the 30-char limitation Oracle has on table names,
|
||
and match the usual conventions for Oracle databases, Django may shorten
|
||
table names and turn them all-uppercase. To prevent such transformations,
|
||
use a quoted name as the value for ``db_table``::
|
||
|
||
db_table = '"name_left_in_lowercase"'
|
||
|
||
Such quoted names can also be used with Django's other supported database
|
||
backends; except for Oracle, however, the quotes have no effect. See the
|
||
:ref:`Oracle notes <oracle-notes>` for more details.
|
||
|
||
``db_tablespace``
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.db_tablespace
|
||
|
||
The name of the :doc:`database tablespace </topics/db/tablespaces>` to use
|
||
for this model. The default is the project's :setting:`DEFAULT_TABLESPACE`
|
||
setting, if set. If the backend doesn't support tablespaces, this option is
|
||
ignored.
|
||
|
||
``get_latest_by``
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.get_latest_by
|
||
|
||
The name of an orderable field in the model, typically a :class:`DateField`,
|
||
:class:`DateTimeField`, or :class:`IntegerField`. This specifies the default
|
||
field to use in your model :class:`Manager`’s
|
||
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.latest` and
|
||
:meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.earliest` methods.
|
||
|
||
Example::
|
||
|
||
get_latest_by = "order_date"
|
||
|
||
See the :meth:`~django.db.models.query.QuerySet.latest` docs for more.
|
||
|
||
``managed``
|
||
-----------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.managed
|
||
|
||
Defaults to ``True``, meaning Django will create the appropriate database
|
||
tables in :djadmin:`migrate` or as part of migrations and remove them as
|
||
part of a :djadmin:`flush` management command. That is, Django
|
||
*manages* the database tables' lifecycles.
|
||
|
||
If ``False``, no database table creation or deletion operations will be
|
||
performed for this model. This is useful if the model represents an existing
|
||
table or a database view that has been created by some other means. This is
|
||
the *only* difference when ``managed=False``. All other aspects of
|
||
model handling are exactly the same as normal. This includes
|
||
|
||
1. Adding an automatic primary key field to the model if you don't
|
||
declare it. To avoid confusion for later code readers, it's
|
||
recommended to specify all the columns from the database table you
|
||
are modeling when using unmanaged models.
|
||
|
||
2. If a model with ``managed=False`` contains a
|
||
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` that points to another
|
||
unmanaged model, then the intermediate table for the many-to-many
|
||
join will also not be created. However, the intermediary table
|
||
between one managed and one unmanaged model *will* be created.
|
||
|
||
If you need to change this default behavior, create the intermediary
|
||
table as an explicit model (with ``managed`` set as needed) and use
|
||
the :attr:`ManyToManyField.through` attribute to make the relation
|
||
use your custom model.
|
||
|
||
For tests involving models with ``managed=False``, it's up to you to ensure
|
||
the correct tables are created as part of the test setup.
|
||
|
||
If you're interested in changing the Python-level behavior of a model class,
|
||
you *could* use ``managed=False`` and create a copy of an existing model.
|
||
However, there's a better approach for that situation: :ref:`proxy-models`.
|
||
|
||
``order_with_respect_to``
|
||
-------------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.order_with_respect_to
|
||
|
||
Marks this object as "orderable" with respect to the given field. This is almost
|
||
always used with related objects to allow them to be ordered with respect to a
|
||
parent object. For example, if an ``Answer`` relates to a ``Question`` object,
|
||
and a question has more than one answer, and the order of answers matters, you'd
|
||
do this::
|
||
|
||
from django.db import models
|
||
|
||
class Question(models.Model):
|
||
text = models.TextField()
|
||
# ...
|
||
|
||
class Answer(models.Model):
|
||
question = models.ForeignKey(Question)
|
||
# ...
|
||
|
||
class Meta:
|
||
order_with_respect_to = 'question'
|
||
|
||
When ``order_with_respect_to`` is set, two additional methods are provided to
|
||
retrieve and to set the order of the related objects: ``get_RELATED_order()``
|
||
and ``set_RELATED_order()``, where ``RELATED`` is the lowercased model name. For
|
||
example, assuming that a ``Question`` object has multiple related ``Answer``
|
||
objects, the list returned contains the primary keys of the related ``Answer``
|
||
objects::
|
||
|
||
>>> question = Question.objects.get(id=1)
|
||
>>> question.get_answer_order()
|
||
[1, 2, 3]
|
||
|
||
The order of a ``Question`` object's related ``Answer`` objects can be set by
|
||
passing in a list of ``Answer`` primary keys::
|
||
|
||
>>> question.set_answer_order([3, 1, 2])
|
||
|
||
The related objects also get two methods, ``get_next_in_order()`` and
|
||
``get_previous_in_order()``, which can be used to access those objects in their
|
||
proper order. Assuming the ``Answer`` objects are ordered by ``id``::
|
||
|
||
>>> answer = Answer.objects.get(id=2)
|
||
>>> answer.get_next_in_order()
|
||
<Answer: 3>
|
||
>>> answer.get_previous_in_order()
|
||
<Answer: 1>
|
||
|
||
.. admonition:: Changing order_with_respect_to
|
||
|
||
``order_with_respect_to`` adds an additional field/database column
|
||
named ``_order``, so be sure to make and apply the appropriate
|
||
migrations if you add or change ``order_with_respect_to``
|
||
after your initial :djadmin:`migrate`.
|
||
|
||
``ordering``
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.ordering
|
||
|
||
The default ordering for the object, for use when obtaining lists of objects::
|
||
|
||
ordering = ['-order_date']
|
||
|
||
This is a tuple or list of strings. Each string is a field name with an optional
|
||
"-" prefix, which indicates descending order. Fields without a leading "-" will
|
||
be ordered ascending. Use the string "?" to order randomly.
|
||
|
||
For example, to order by a ``pub_date`` field ascending, use this::
|
||
|
||
ordering = ['pub_date']
|
||
|
||
To order by ``pub_date`` descending, use this::
|
||
|
||
ordering = ['-pub_date']
|
||
|
||
To order by ``pub_date`` descending, then by ``author`` ascending, use this::
|
||
|
||
ordering = ['-pub_date', 'author']
|
||
|
||
.. warning::
|
||
|
||
Ordering is not a free operation. Each field you add to the ordering
|
||
incurs a cost to your database. Each foreign key you add will
|
||
implicitly include all of its default orderings as well.
|
||
|
||
``permissions``
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.permissions
|
||
|
||
Extra permissions to enter into the permissions table when creating this object.
|
||
Add, delete and change permissions are automatically created for each
|
||
model. This example specifies an extra permission, ``can_deliver_pizzas``::
|
||
|
||
permissions = (("can_deliver_pizzas", "Can deliver pizzas"),)
|
||
|
||
This is a list or tuple of 2-tuples in the format ``(permission_code,
|
||
human_readable_permission_name)``.
|
||
|
||
``default_permissions``
|
||
------------------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.default_permissions
|
||
|
||
.. versionadded:: 1.7
|
||
|
||
Defaults to ``('add', 'change', 'delete')``. You may customize this list,
|
||
for example, by setting this to an empty list if your app doesn't require
|
||
any of the default permissions. It must be specified on the model before
|
||
the model is created by :djadmin:`migrate` in order to prevent any omitted
|
||
permissions from being created.
|
||
|
||
``proxy``
|
||
---------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.proxy
|
||
|
||
If ``proxy = True``, a model which subclasses another model will be treated as
|
||
a :ref:`proxy model <proxy-models>`.
|
||
|
||
``select_on_save``
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.select_on_save
|
||
|
||
.. versionadded:: 1.6
|
||
|
||
Determines if Django will use the pre-1.6
|
||
:meth:`django.db.models.Model.save()` algorithm. The old algorithm
|
||
uses ``SELECT`` to determine if there is an existing row to be updated.
|
||
The new algorithm tries an ``UPDATE`` directly. In some rare cases the
|
||
``UPDATE`` of an existing row isn't visible to Django. An example is the
|
||
PostgreSQL ``ON UPDATE`` trigger which returns ``NULL``. In such cases the
|
||
new algorithm will end up doing an ``INSERT`` even when a row exists in
|
||
the database.
|
||
|
||
Usually there is no need to set this attribute. The default is
|
||
``False``.
|
||
|
||
See :meth:`django.db.models.Model.save()` for more about the old and
|
||
new saving algorithm.
|
||
|
||
``unique_together``
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.unique_together
|
||
|
||
Sets of field names that, taken together, must be unique::
|
||
|
||
unique_together = (("driver", "restaurant"),)
|
||
|
||
This is a tuple of tuples that must be unique when considered together.
|
||
It's used in the Django admin and is enforced at the database level (i.e., the
|
||
appropriate ``UNIQUE`` statements are included in the ``CREATE TABLE``
|
||
statement).
|
||
|
||
For convenience, unique_together can be a single tuple when dealing with a single
|
||
set of fields::
|
||
|
||
unique_together = ("driver", "restaurant")
|
||
|
||
A :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` cannot be included in
|
||
unique_together. (It's not clear what that would even mean!) If you
|
||
need to validate uniqueness related to a
|
||
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`, try using a signal or
|
||
an explicit :attr:`through <ManyToManyField.through>` model.
|
||
|
||
.. versionchanged:: 1.7
|
||
|
||
The ``ValidationError`` raised during model validation when the
|
||
constraint is violated has the ``unique_together`` error code.
|
||
|
||
``index_together``
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.index_together
|
||
|
||
Sets of field names that, taken together, are indexed::
|
||
|
||
index_together = [
|
||
["pub_date", "deadline"],
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
This list of fields will be indexed together (i.e. the appropriate
|
||
``CREATE INDEX`` statement will be issued.)
|
||
|
||
.. versionchanged:: 1.7
|
||
|
||
For convenience, ``index_together`` can be a single list when dealing with a single
|
||
set of fields::
|
||
|
||
index_together = ["pub_date", "deadline"]
|
||
|
||
``verbose_name``
|
||
----------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.verbose_name
|
||
|
||
A human-readable name for the object, singular::
|
||
|
||
verbose_name = "pizza"
|
||
|
||
If this isn't given, Django will use a munged version of the class name:
|
||
``CamelCase`` becomes ``camel case``.
|
||
|
||
``verbose_name_plural``
|
||
-----------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Options.verbose_name_plural
|
||
|
||
The plural name for the object::
|
||
|
||
verbose_name_plural = "stories"
|
||
|
||
If this isn't given, Django will use :attr:`~Options.verbose_name` + ``"s"``.
|