mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-26 11:06:07 +00:00
d818e0c9b2
This is the result of Christopher Medrela's 2013 Summer of Code project. Thanks also to Preston Holmes, Tim Graham, Anssi Kääriäinen, Florian Apolloner, and Alex Gaynor for review notes along the way. Also: Fixes #8579, fixes #3055, fixes #19844.
1289 lines
50 KiB
Plaintext
1289 lines
50 KiB
Plaintext
======
|
|
Models
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
.. module:: django.db.models
|
|
|
|
A model is the single, definitive source of information about your data. It
|
|
contains the essential fields and behaviors of the data you're storing.
|
|
Generally, each model maps to a single database table.
|
|
|
|
The basics:
|
|
|
|
* Each model is a Python class that subclasses
|
|
:class:`django.db.models.Model`.
|
|
|
|
* Each attribute of the model represents a database field.
|
|
|
|
* With all of this, Django gives you an automatically-generated
|
|
database-access API; see :doc:`/topics/db/queries`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick example
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
This example model defines a ``Person``, which has a ``first_name`` and
|
|
``last_name``::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
|
|
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
|
|
|
|
``first_name`` and ``last_name`` are fields_ of the model. Each field is
|
|
specified as a class attribute, and each attribute maps to a database column.
|
|
|
|
The above ``Person`` model would create a database table like this:
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: sql
|
|
|
|
CREATE TABLE myapp_person (
|
|
"id" serial NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
|
|
"first_name" varchar(30) NOT NULL,
|
|
"last_name" varchar(30) NOT NULL
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Some technical notes:
|
|
|
|
* The name of the table, ``myapp_person``, is automatically derived from
|
|
some model metadata but can be overridden. See :ref:`table-names` for more
|
|
details.
|
|
|
|
* An ``id`` field is added automatically, but this behavior can be
|
|
overridden. See :ref:`automatic-primary-key-fields`.
|
|
|
|
* The ``CREATE TABLE`` SQL in this example is formatted using PostgreSQL
|
|
syntax, but it's worth noting Django uses SQL tailored to the database
|
|
backend specified in your :doc:`settings file </topics/settings>`.
|
|
|
|
Using models
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Once you have defined your models, you need to tell Django you're going to *use*
|
|
those models. Do this by editing your settings file and changing the
|
|
:setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` setting to add the name of the module that contains
|
|
your ``models.py``.
|
|
|
|
For example, if the models for your application live in the module
|
|
``myapp.models`` (the package structure that is created for an
|
|
application by the :djadmin:`manage.py startapp <startapp>` script),
|
|
:setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` should read, in part::
|
|
|
|
INSTALLED_APPS = (
|
|
#...
|
|
'myapp',
|
|
#...
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
When you add new apps to :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`, be sure to run
|
|
:djadmin:`manage.py migrate <migrate>`, optionally making migrations
|
|
for them first with :djadmin:`manage.py makemigrations <makemigrations>`.
|
|
|
|
Fields
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
The most important part of a model -- and the only required part of a model --
|
|
is the list of database fields it defines. Fields are specified by class
|
|
attributes. Be careful not to choose field names that conflict with the
|
|
:doc:`models API </ref/models/instances>` like ``clean``, ``save``, or
|
|
``delete``.
|
|
|
|
Example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Musician(models.Model):
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
instrument = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
|
|
class Album(models.Model):
|
|
artist = models.ForeignKey(Musician)
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
release_date = models.DateField()
|
|
num_stars = models.IntegerField()
|
|
|
|
Field types
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
Each field in your model should be an instance of the appropriate
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.Field` class. Django uses the field class types to
|
|
determine a few things:
|
|
|
|
* The database column type (e.g. ``INTEGER``, ``VARCHAR``).
|
|
|
|
* The default HTML :doc:`widget </ref/forms/widgets>` to use when rendering a form
|
|
field (e.g. ``<input type="text">``, ``<select>``).
|
|
|
|
* The minimal validation requirements, used in Django's admin and in
|
|
automatically-generated forms.
|
|
|
|
Django ships with dozens of built-in field types; you can find the complete list
|
|
in the :ref:`model field reference <model-field-types>`. You can easily write
|
|
your own fields if Django's built-in ones don't do the trick; see
|
|
:doc:`/howto/custom-model-fields`.
|
|
|
|
Field options
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Each field takes a certain set of field-specific arguments (documented in the
|
|
:ref:`model field reference <model-field-types>`). For example,
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.CharField` (and its subclasses) require a
|
|
:attr:`~django.db.models.CharField.max_length` argument which specifies the size
|
|
of the ``VARCHAR`` database field used to store the data.
|
|
|
|
There's also a set of common arguments available to all field types. All are
|
|
optional. They're fully explained in the :ref:`reference
|
|
<common-model-field-options>`, but here's a quick summary of the most often-used
|
|
ones:
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.null`
|
|
If ``True``, Django will store empty values as ``NULL`` in the database.
|
|
Default is ``False``.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.blank`
|
|
If ``True``, the field is allowed to be blank. Default is ``False``.
|
|
|
|
Note that this is different than :attr:`~Field.null`.
|
|
:attr:`~Field.null` is purely database-related, whereas
|
|
:attr:`~Field.blank` is validation-related. If a field has
|
|
:attr:`blank=True <Field.blank>`, form validation will
|
|
allow entry of an empty value. If a field has :attr:`blank=False
|
|
<Field.blank>`, the field will be required.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.choices`
|
|
An iterable (e.g., a list or tuple) of 2-tuples to use as choices for
|
|
this field. If this is given, the default form widget will be a select box
|
|
instead of the standard text field and will limit choices to the choices
|
|
given.
|
|
|
|
A choices list looks like this::
|
|
|
|
YEAR_IN_SCHOOL_CHOICES = (
|
|
('FR', 'Freshman'),
|
|
('SO', 'Sophomore'),
|
|
('JR', 'Junior'),
|
|
('SR', 'Senior'),
|
|
('GR', 'Graduate'),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
The first element in each tuple is the value that will be stored in the
|
|
database, the second element will be displayed by the default form widget
|
|
or in a ModelChoiceField. Given an instance of a model object, the
|
|
display value for a choices field can be accessed using the
|
|
``get_FOO_display`` method. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
SHIRT_SIZES = (
|
|
('S', 'Small'),
|
|
('M', 'Medium'),
|
|
('L', 'Large'),
|
|
)
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=60)
|
|
shirt_size = models.CharField(max_length=1, choices=SHIRT_SIZES)
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
>>> p = Person(name="Fred Flintstone", shirt_size="L")
|
|
>>> p.save()
|
|
>>> p.shirt_size
|
|
u'L'
|
|
>>> p.get_shirt_size_display()
|
|
u'Large'
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.default`
|
|
The default value for the field. This can be a value or a callable
|
|
object. If callable it will be called every time a new object is
|
|
created.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.help_text`
|
|
Extra "help" text to be displayed with the form widget. It's useful for
|
|
documentation even if your field isn't used on a form.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.primary_key`
|
|
If ``True``, this field is the primary key for the model.
|
|
|
|
If you don't specify :attr:`primary_key=True <Field.primary_key>` for
|
|
any fields in your model, Django will automatically add an
|
|
:class:`IntegerField` to hold the primary key, so you don't need to set
|
|
:attr:`primary_key=True <Field.primary_key>` on any of your fields
|
|
unless you want to override the default primary-key behavior. For more,
|
|
see :ref:`automatic-primary-key-fields`.
|
|
|
|
:attr:`~Field.unique`
|
|
If ``True``, this field must be unique throughout the table.
|
|
|
|
Again, these are just short descriptions of the most common field options. Full
|
|
details can be found in the :ref:`common model field option reference
|
|
<common-model-field-options>`.
|
|
|
|
.. _automatic-primary-key-fields:
|
|
|
|
Automatic primary key fields
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
By default, Django gives each model the following field::
|
|
|
|
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
|
|
|
|
This is an auto-incrementing primary key.
|
|
|
|
If you'd like to specify a custom primary key, just specify
|
|
:attr:`primary_key=True <Field.primary_key>` on one of your fields. If Django
|
|
sees you've explicitly set :attr:`Field.primary_key`, it won't add the automatic
|
|
``id`` column.
|
|
|
|
Each model requires exactly one field to have :attr:`primary_key=True
|
|
<Field.primary_key>` (either explicitly declared or automatically added).
|
|
|
|
.. _verbose-field-names:
|
|
|
|
Verbose field names
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Each field type, except for :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` and
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField`, takes an optional first positional
|
|
argument -- a verbose name. If the verbose name isn't given, Django will
|
|
automatically create it using the field's attribute name, converting underscores
|
|
to spaces.
|
|
|
|
In this example, the verbose name is ``"person's first name"``::
|
|
|
|
first_name = models.CharField("person's first name", max_length=30)
|
|
|
|
In this example, the verbose name is ``"first name"``::
|
|
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`,
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` and
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` require the first argument to be a
|
|
model class, so use the :attr:`~Field.verbose_name` keyword argument::
|
|
|
|
poll = models.ForeignKey(Poll, verbose_name="the related poll")
|
|
sites = models.ManyToManyField(Site, verbose_name="list of sites")
|
|
place = models.OneToOneField(Place, verbose_name="related place")
|
|
|
|
The convention is not to capitalize the first letter of the
|
|
:attr:`~Field.verbose_name`. Django will automatically capitalize the first
|
|
letter where it needs to.
|
|
|
|
Relationships
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Clearly, the power of relational databases lies in relating tables to each
|
|
other. Django offers ways to define the three most common types of database
|
|
relationships: many-to-one, many-to-many and one-to-one.
|
|
|
|
Many-to-one relationships
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
To define a many-to-one relationship, use :class:`django.db.models.ForeignKey`.
|
|
You use it just like any other :class:`~django.db.models.Field` type: by
|
|
including it as a class attribute of your model.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` requires a positional argument: the class
|
|
to which the model is related.
|
|
|
|
For example, if a ``Car`` model has a ``Manufacturer`` -- that is, a
|
|
``Manufacturer`` makes multiple cars but each ``Car`` only has one
|
|
``Manufacturer`` -- use the following definitions::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Manufacturer(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
class Car(models.Model):
|
|
manufacturer = models.ForeignKey(Manufacturer)
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
You can also create :ref:`recursive relationships <recursive-relationships>` (an
|
|
object with a many-to-one relationship to itself) and :ref:`relationships to
|
|
models not yet defined <lazy-relationships>`; see :ref:`the model field
|
|
reference <ref-foreignkey>` for details.
|
|
|
|
It's suggested, but not required, that the name of a
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` field (``manufacturer`` in the example
|
|
above) be the name of the model, lowercase. You can, of course, call the field
|
|
whatever you want. For example::
|
|
|
|
class Car(models.Model):
|
|
company_that_makes_it = models.ForeignKey(Manufacturer)
|
|
# ...
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` fields accept a number of extra
|
|
arguments which are explained in :ref:`the model field reference
|
|
<foreign-key-arguments>`. These options help define how the relationship
|
|
should work; all are optional.
|
|
|
|
For details on accessing backwards-related objects, see the
|
|
:ref:`Following relationships backward example <backwards-related-objects>`.
|
|
|
|
For sample code, see the :doc:`Many-to-one relationship model example
|
|
</topics/db/examples/many_to_one>`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many-to-many relationships
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
To define a many-to-many relationship, use
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`. You use it just like any other
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.Field` type: by including it as a class attribute of
|
|
your model.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` requires a positional argument: the
|
|
class to which the model is related.
|
|
|
|
For example, if a ``Pizza`` has multiple ``Topping`` objects -- that is, a
|
|
``Topping`` can be on multiple pizzas and each ``Pizza`` has multiple toppings
|
|
-- here's how you'd represent that::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Topping(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
class Pizza(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
toppings = models.ManyToManyField(Topping)
|
|
|
|
As with :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`, you can also create
|
|
:ref:`recursive relationships <recursive-relationships>` (an object with a
|
|
many-to-many relationship to itself) and :ref:`relationships to models not yet
|
|
defined <lazy-relationships>`; see :ref:`the model field reference
|
|
<ref-manytomany>` for details.
|
|
|
|
It's suggested, but not required, that the name of a
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` (``toppings`` in the example above)
|
|
be a plural describing the set of related model objects.
|
|
|
|
It doesn't matter which model has the
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`, but you should only put it in one
|
|
of the models -- not both.
|
|
|
|
Generally, :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` instances should go in
|
|
the object that's going to be edited on a form. In the above example,
|
|
``toppings`` is in ``Pizza`` (rather than ``Topping`` having a ``pizzas``
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` ) because it's more natural to think
|
|
about a pizza having toppings than a topping being on multiple pizzas. The way
|
|
it's set up above, the ``Pizza`` form would let users select the toppings.
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
See the :doc:`Many-to-many relationship model example
|
|
</topics/db/examples/many_to_many>` for a full example.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` fields also accept a number of
|
|
extra arguments which are explained in :ref:`the model field reference
|
|
<manytomany-arguments>`. These options help define how the relationship
|
|
should work; all are optional.
|
|
|
|
.. _intermediary-manytomany:
|
|
|
|
Extra fields on many-to-many relationships
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
When you're only dealing with simple many-to-many relationships such as
|
|
mixing and matching pizzas and toppings, a standard
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` is all you need. However, sometimes
|
|
you may need to associate data with the relationship between two models.
|
|
|
|
For example, consider the case of an application tracking the musical groups
|
|
which musicians belong to. There is a many-to-many relationship between a person
|
|
and the groups of which they are a member, so you could use a
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` to represent this relationship.
|
|
However, there is a lot of detail about the membership that you might want to
|
|
collect, such as the date at which the person joined the group.
|
|
|
|
For these situations, Django allows you to specify the model that will be used
|
|
to govern the many-to-many relationship. You can then put extra fields on the
|
|
intermediate model. The intermediate model is associated with the
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` using the
|
|
:attr:`through <ManyToManyField.through>` argument to point to the model
|
|
that will act as an intermediary. For our musician example, the code would look
|
|
something like this::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
|
|
|
|
# On Python 3: def __str__(self):
|
|
def __unicode__(self):
|
|
return self.name
|
|
|
|
class Group(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=128)
|
|
members = models.ManyToManyField(Person, through='Membership')
|
|
|
|
# On Python 3: def __str__(self):
|
|
def __unicode__(self):
|
|
return self.name
|
|
|
|
class Membership(models.Model):
|
|
person = models.ForeignKey(Person)
|
|
group = models.ForeignKey(Group)
|
|
date_joined = models.DateField()
|
|
invite_reason = models.CharField(max_length=64)
|
|
|
|
When you set up the intermediary model, you explicitly specify foreign
|
|
keys to the models that are involved in the ManyToMany relation. This
|
|
explicit declaration defines how the two models are related.
|
|
|
|
There are a few restrictions on the intermediate model:
|
|
|
|
* Your intermediate model must contain one - and *only* one - foreign key
|
|
to the target model (this would be ``Person`` in our example). If you
|
|
have more than one foreign key, a validation error will be raised.
|
|
|
|
* Your intermediate model must contain one - and *only* one - foreign key
|
|
to the source model (this would be ``Group`` in our example). If you
|
|
have more than one foreign key, a validation error will be raised.
|
|
|
|
* The only exception to this is a model which has a many-to-many
|
|
relationship to itself, through an intermediary model. In this
|
|
case, two foreign keys to the same model are permitted, but they
|
|
will be treated as the two (different) sides of the many-to-many
|
|
relation.
|
|
|
|
* When defining a many-to-many relationship from a model to
|
|
itself, using an intermediary model, you *must* use
|
|
:attr:`symmetrical=False <ManyToManyField.symmetrical>` (see
|
|
:ref:`the model field reference <manytomany-arguments>`).
|
|
|
|
Now that you have set up your :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` to use
|
|
your intermediary model (``Membership``, in this case), you're ready to start
|
|
creating some many-to-many relationships. You do this by creating instances of
|
|
the intermediate model::
|
|
|
|
>>> ringo = Person.objects.create(name="Ringo Starr")
|
|
>>> paul = Person.objects.create(name="Paul McCartney")
|
|
>>> beatles = Group.objects.create(name="The Beatles")
|
|
>>> m1 = Membership(person=ringo, group=beatles,
|
|
... date_joined=date(1962, 8, 16),
|
|
... invite_reason="Needed a new drummer.")
|
|
>>> m1.save()
|
|
>>> beatles.members.all()
|
|
[<Person: Ringo Starr>]
|
|
>>> ringo.group_set.all()
|
|
[<Group: The Beatles>]
|
|
>>> m2 = Membership.objects.create(person=paul, group=beatles,
|
|
... date_joined=date(1960, 8, 1),
|
|
... invite_reason="Wanted to form a band.")
|
|
>>> beatles.members.all()
|
|
[<Person: Ringo Starr>, <Person: Paul McCartney>]
|
|
|
|
Unlike normal many-to-many fields, you *can't* use ``add``, ``create``,
|
|
or assignment (i.e., ``beatles.members = [...]``) to create relationships::
|
|
|
|
# THIS WILL NOT WORK
|
|
>>> beatles.members.add(john)
|
|
# NEITHER WILL THIS
|
|
>>> beatles.members.create(name="George Harrison")
|
|
# AND NEITHER WILL THIS
|
|
>>> beatles.members = [john, paul, ringo, george]
|
|
|
|
Why? You can't just create a relationship between a ``Person`` and a ``Group``
|
|
- you need to specify all the detail for the relationship required by the
|
|
``Membership`` model. The simple ``add``, ``create`` and assignment calls
|
|
don't provide a way to specify this extra detail. As a result, they are
|
|
disabled for many-to-many relationships that use an intermediate model.
|
|
The only way to create this type of relationship is to create instances of the
|
|
intermediate model.
|
|
|
|
The :meth:`~django.db.models.fields.related.RelatedManager.remove` method is
|
|
disabled for similar reasons. However, the
|
|
:meth:`~django.db.models.fields.related.RelatedManager.clear` method can be
|
|
used to remove all many-to-many relationships for an instance::
|
|
|
|
>>> # Beatles have broken up
|
|
>>> beatles.members.clear()
|
|
>>> # Note that this deletes the intermediate model instances
|
|
>>> Membership.objects.all()
|
|
[]
|
|
|
|
Once you have established the many-to-many relationships by creating instances
|
|
of your intermediate model, you can issue queries. Just as with normal
|
|
many-to-many relationships, you can query using the attributes of the
|
|
many-to-many-related model::
|
|
|
|
# Find all the groups with a member whose name starts with 'Paul'
|
|
>>> Group.objects.filter(members__name__startswith='Paul')
|
|
[<Group: The Beatles>]
|
|
|
|
As you are using an intermediate model, you can also query on its attributes::
|
|
|
|
# Find all the members of the Beatles that joined after 1 Jan 1961
|
|
>>> Person.objects.filter(
|
|
... group__name='The Beatles',
|
|
... membership__date_joined__gt=date(1961,1,1))
|
|
[<Person: Ringo Starr]
|
|
|
|
If you need to access a membership's information you may do so by directly
|
|
querying the ``Membership`` model::
|
|
|
|
>>> ringos_membership = Membership.objects.get(group=beatles, person=ringo)
|
|
>>> ringos_membership.date_joined
|
|
datetime.date(1962, 8, 16)
|
|
>>> ringos_membership.invite_reason
|
|
u'Needed a new drummer.'
|
|
|
|
Another way to access the same information is by querying the
|
|
:ref:`many-to-many reverse relationship<m2m-reverse-relationships>` from a
|
|
``Person`` object::
|
|
|
|
>>> ringos_membership = ringo.membership_set.get(group=beatles)
|
|
>>> ringos_membership.date_joined
|
|
datetime.date(1962, 8, 16)
|
|
>>> ringos_membership.invite_reason
|
|
u'Needed a new drummer.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-to-one relationships
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
To define a one-to-one relationship, use
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField`. You use it just like any other
|
|
``Field`` type: by including it as a class attribute of your model.
|
|
|
|
This is most useful on the primary key of an object when that object "extends"
|
|
another object in some way.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` requires a positional argument: the
|
|
class to which the model is related.
|
|
|
|
For example, if you were building a database of "places", you would
|
|
build pretty standard stuff such as address, phone number, etc. in the
|
|
database. Then, if you wanted to build a database of restaurants on
|
|
top of the places, instead of repeating yourself and replicating those
|
|
fields in the ``Restaurant`` model, you could make ``Restaurant`` have
|
|
a :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` to ``Place`` (because a
|
|
restaurant "is a" place; in fact, to handle this you'd typically use
|
|
:ref:`inheritance <model-inheritance>`, which involves an implicit
|
|
one-to-one relation).
|
|
|
|
As with :class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey`, a
|
|
:ref:`recursive relationship <recursive-relationships>`
|
|
can be defined and
|
|
:ref:`references to as-yet undefined models <lazy-relationships>`
|
|
can be made; see :ref:`the model field reference <ref-onetoone>` for details.
|
|
|
|
.. seealso::
|
|
|
|
See the :doc:`One-to-one relationship model example
|
|
</topics/db/examples/one_to_one>` for a full example.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` fields also accept one specific,
|
|
optional ``parent_link`` argument described in the :ref:`model field
|
|
reference <ref-onetoone>`.
|
|
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` classes used to automatically become
|
|
the primary key on a model. This is no longer true (although you can manually
|
|
pass in the :attr:`~django.db.models.Field.primary_key` argument if you like).
|
|
Thus, it's now possible to have multiple fields of type
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` on a single model.
|
|
|
|
Models across files
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
It's perfectly OK to relate a model to one from another app. To do this, import
|
|
the related model at the top of the file where your model is defined. Then,
|
|
just refer to the other model class wherever needed. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
from geography.models import ZipCode
|
|
|
|
class Restaurant(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
zip_code = models.ForeignKey(ZipCode)
|
|
|
|
Field name restrictions
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
Django places only two restrictions on model field names:
|
|
|
|
1. A field name cannot be a Python reserved word, because that would result
|
|
in a Python syntax error. For example::
|
|
|
|
class Example(models.Model):
|
|
pass = models.IntegerField() # 'pass' is a reserved word!
|
|
|
|
2. A field name cannot contain more than one underscore in a row, due to
|
|
the way Django's query lookup syntax works. For example::
|
|
|
|
class Example(models.Model):
|
|
foo__bar = models.IntegerField() # 'foo__bar' has two underscores!
|
|
|
|
These limitations can be worked around, though, because your field name doesn't
|
|
necessarily have to match your database column name. See the
|
|
:attr:`~Field.db_column` option.
|
|
|
|
SQL reserved words, such as ``join``, ``where`` or ``select``, *are* allowed as
|
|
model field names, because Django escapes all database table names and column
|
|
names in every underlying SQL query. It uses the quoting syntax of your
|
|
particular database engine.
|
|
|
|
Custom field types
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
If one of the existing model fields cannot be used to fit your purposes, or if
|
|
you wish to take advantage of some less common database column types, you can
|
|
create your own field class. Full coverage of creating your own fields is
|
|
provided in :doc:`/howto/custom-model-fields`.
|
|
|
|
.. _meta-options:
|
|
|
|
Meta options
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Give your model metadata by using an inner ``class Meta``, like so::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Ox(models.Model):
|
|
horn_length = models.IntegerField()
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
ordering = ["horn_length"]
|
|
verbose_name_plural = "oxen"
|
|
|
|
Model metadata is "anything that's not a field", such as ordering options
|
|
(:attr:`~Options.ordering`), database table name (:attr:`~Options.db_table`), or
|
|
human-readable singular and plural names (:attr:`~Options.verbose_name` and
|
|
:attr:`~Options.verbose_name_plural`). None are required, and adding ``class
|
|
Meta`` to a model is completely optional.
|
|
|
|
A complete list of all possible ``Meta`` options can be found in the :doc:`model
|
|
option reference </ref/models/options>`.
|
|
|
|
.. _model-methods:
|
|
|
|
Model methods
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
Define custom methods on a model to add custom "row-level" functionality to your
|
|
objects. Whereas :class:`~django.db.models.Manager` methods are intended to do
|
|
"table-wide" things, model methods should act on a particular model instance.
|
|
|
|
This is a valuable technique for keeping business logic in one place -- the
|
|
model.
|
|
|
|
For example, this model has a few custom methods::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
birth_date = models.DateField()
|
|
address = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
city = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
state = models.CharField(max_length=2) # yes, this is America-centric
|
|
|
|
def baby_boomer_status(self):
|
|
"Returns the person's baby-boomer status."
|
|
import datetime
|
|
if self.birth_date < datetime.date(1945, 8, 1):
|
|
return "Pre-boomer"
|
|
elif self.birth_date < datetime.date(1965, 1, 1):
|
|
return "Baby boomer"
|
|
else:
|
|
return "Post-boomer"
|
|
|
|
def is_midwestern(self):
|
|
"Returns True if this person is from the Midwest."
|
|
return self.state in ('IL', 'WI', 'MI', 'IN', 'OH', 'IA', 'MO')
|
|
|
|
def _get_full_name(self):
|
|
"Returns the person's full name."
|
|
return '%s %s' % (self.first_name, self.last_name)
|
|
full_name = property(_get_full_name)
|
|
|
|
The last method in this example is a :term:`property`.
|
|
|
|
The :doc:`model instance reference </ref/models/instances>` has a complete list
|
|
of :ref:`methods automatically given to each model <model-instance-methods>`.
|
|
You can override most of these -- see `overriding predefined model methods`_,
|
|
below -- but there are a couple that you'll almost always want to define:
|
|
|
|
:meth:`~Model.__str__` (Python 3)
|
|
Python 3 equivalent of ``__unicode__()``.
|
|
|
|
:meth:`~Model.__unicode__` (Python 2)
|
|
A Python "magic method" that returns a unicode "representation" of any
|
|
object. This is what Python and Django will use whenever a model
|
|
instance needs to be coerced and displayed as a plain string. Most
|
|
notably, this happens when you display an object in an interactive
|
|
console or in the admin.
|
|
|
|
You'll always want to define this method; the default isn't very helpful
|
|
at all.
|
|
|
|
:meth:`~Model.get_absolute_url`
|
|
This tells Django how to calculate the URL for an object. Django uses
|
|
this in its admin interface, and any time it needs to figure out a URL
|
|
for an object.
|
|
|
|
Any object that has a URL that uniquely identifies it should define this
|
|
method.
|
|
|
|
.. _overriding-model-methods:
|
|
|
|
Overriding predefined model methods
|
|
-----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
There's another set of :ref:`model methods <model-instance-methods>` that
|
|
encapsulate a bunch of database behavior that you'll want to customize. In
|
|
particular you'll often want to change the way :meth:`~Model.save` and
|
|
:meth:`~Model.delete` work.
|
|
|
|
You're free to override these methods (and any other model method) to alter
|
|
behavior.
|
|
|
|
A classic use-case for overriding the built-in methods is if you want something
|
|
to happen whenever you save an object. For example (see
|
|
:meth:`~Model.save` for documentation of the parameters it accepts)::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Blog(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
tagline = models.TextField()
|
|
|
|
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
do_something()
|
|
super(Blog, self).save(*args, **kwargs) # Call the "real" save() method.
|
|
do_something_else()
|
|
|
|
You can also prevent saving::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Blog(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
tagline = models.TextField()
|
|
|
|
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
|
|
if self.name == "Yoko Ono's blog":
|
|
return # Yoko shall never have her own blog!
|
|
else:
|
|
super(Blog, self).save(*args, **kwargs) # Call the "real" save() method.
|
|
|
|
It's important to remember to call the superclass method -- that's
|
|
that ``super(Blog, self).save(*args, **kwargs)`` business -- to ensure
|
|
that the object still gets saved into the database. If you forget to
|
|
call the superclass method, the default behavior won't happen and the
|
|
database won't get touched.
|
|
|
|
It's also important that you pass through the arguments that can be
|
|
passed to the model method -- that's what the ``*args, **kwargs`` bit
|
|
does. Django will, from time to time, extend the capabilities of
|
|
built-in model methods, adding new arguments. If you use ``*args,
|
|
**kwargs`` in your method definitions, you are guaranteed that your
|
|
code will automatically support those arguments when they are added.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Overridden model methods are not called on bulk operations
|
|
|
|
Note that the :meth:`~Model.delete()` method for an object is not
|
|
necessarily called when :ref:`deleting objects in bulk using a
|
|
QuerySet<topics-db-queries-delete>`. To ensure customized delete logic
|
|
gets executed, you can use :data:`~django.db.models.signals.pre_delete`
|
|
and/or :data:`~django.db.models.signals.post_delete` signals.
|
|
|
|
Unfortunately, there isn't a workaround when
|
|
:meth:`creating<django.db.models.query.QuerySet.bulk_create>` or
|
|
:meth:`updating<django.db.models.query.QuerySet.update>` objects in bulk,
|
|
since none of :meth:`~Model.save()`,
|
|
:data:`~django.db.models.signals.pre_save`, and
|
|
:data:`~django.db.models.signals.post_save` are called.
|
|
|
|
Executing custom SQL
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Another common pattern is writing custom SQL statements in model methods and
|
|
module-level methods. For more details on using raw SQL, see the documentation
|
|
on :doc:`using raw SQL</topics/db/sql>`.
|
|
|
|
.. _model-inheritance:
|
|
|
|
Model inheritance
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
Model inheritance in Django works almost identically to the way normal
|
|
class inheritance works in Python. The only decision you have to make
|
|
is whether you want the parent models to be models in their own right
|
|
(with their own database tables), or if the parents are just holders
|
|
of common information that will only be visible through the child
|
|
models.
|
|
|
|
There are three styles of inheritance that are possible in Django.
|
|
|
|
1. Often, you will just want to use the parent class to hold information that
|
|
you don't want to have to type out for each child model. This class isn't
|
|
going to ever be used in isolation, so :ref:`abstract-base-classes` are
|
|
what you're after.
|
|
2. If you're subclassing an existing model (perhaps something from another
|
|
application entirely) and want each model to have its own database table,
|
|
:ref:`multi-table-inheritance` is the way to go.
|
|
3. Finally, if you only want to modify the Python-level behavior of a model,
|
|
without changing the models fields in any way, you can use
|
|
:ref:`proxy-models`.
|
|
|
|
.. _abstract-base-classes:
|
|
|
|
Abstract base classes
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
Abstract base classes are useful when you want to put some common
|
|
information into a number of other models. You write your base class
|
|
and put ``abstract=True`` in the :ref:`Meta <meta-options>`
|
|
class. This model will then not be used to create any database
|
|
table. Instead, when it is used as a base class for other models, its
|
|
fields will be added to those of the child class. It is an error to
|
|
have fields in the abstract base class with the same name as those in
|
|
the child (and Django will raise an exception).
|
|
|
|
An example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class CommonInfo(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=100)
|
|
age = models.PositiveIntegerField()
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
abstract = True
|
|
|
|
class Student(CommonInfo):
|
|
home_group = models.CharField(max_length=5)
|
|
|
|
The ``Student`` model will have three fields: ``name``, ``age`` and
|
|
``home_group``. The ``CommonInfo`` model cannot be used as a normal Django
|
|
model, since it is an abstract base class. It does not generate a database
|
|
table or have a manager, and cannot be instantiated or saved directly.
|
|
|
|
For many uses, this type of model inheritance will be exactly what you want.
|
|
It provides a way to factor out common information at the Python level, whilst
|
|
still only creating one database table per child model at the database level.
|
|
|
|
``Meta`` inheritance
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
When an abstract base class is created, Django makes any :ref:`Meta <meta-options>`
|
|
inner class you declared in the base class available as an
|
|
attribute. If a child class does not declare its own :ref:`Meta <meta-options>`
|
|
class, it will inherit the parent's :ref:`Meta <meta-options>`. If the child wants to
|
|
extend the parent's :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` class, it can subclass it. For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class CommonInfo(models.Model):
|
|
# ...
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
abstract = True
|
|
ordering = ['name']
|
|
|
|
class Student(CommonInfo):
|
|
# ...
|
|
class Meta(CommonInfo.Meta):
|
|
db_table = 'student_info'
|
|
|
|
Django does make one adjustment to the :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` class of an abstract base
|
|
class: before installing the :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` attribute, it sets ``abstract=False``.
|
|
This means that children of abstract base classes don't automatically become
|
|
abstract classes themselves. Of course, you can make an abstract base class
|
|
that inherits from another abstract base class. You just need to remember to
|
|
explicitly set ``abstract=True`` each time.
|
|
|
|
Some attributes won't make sense to include in the :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` class of an
|
|
abstract base class. For example, including ``db_table`` would mean that all
|
|
the child classes (the ones that don't specify their own :ref:`Meta <meta-options>`) would use
|
|
the same database table, which is almost certainly not what you want.
|
|
|
|
.. _abstract-related-name:
|
|
|
|
Be careful with ``related_name``
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If you are using the :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name` attribute on a ``ForeignKey`` or
|
|
``ManyToManyField``, you must always specify a *unique* reverse name for the
|
|
field. This would normally cause a problem in abstract base classes, since the
|
|
fields on this class are included into each of the child classes, with exactly
|
|
the same values for the attributes (including :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name`) each time.
|
|
|
|
To work around this problem, when you are using :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name` in an
|
|
abstract base class (only), part of the name should contain
|
|
``'%(app_label)s'`` and ``'%(class)s'``.
|
|
|
|
- ``'%(class)s'`` is replaced by the lower-cased name of the child class
|
|
that the field is used in.
|
|
- ``'%(app_label)s'`` is replaced by the lower-cased name of the app the child
|
|
class is contained within. Each installed application name must be unique
|
|
and the model class names within each app must also be unique, therefore the
|
|
resulting name will end up being different.
|
|
|
|
For example, given an app ``common/models.py``::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Base(models.Model):
|
|
m2m = models.ManyToManyField(OtherModel, related_name="%(app_label)s_%(class)s_related")
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
abstract = True
|
|
|
|
class ChildA(Base):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
class ChildB(Base):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
Along with another app ``rare/models.py``::
|
|
|
|
from common.models import Base
|
|
|
|
class ChildB(Base):
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
The reverse name of the ``common.ChildA.m2m`` field will be
|
|
``common_childa_related``, whilst the reverse name of the
|
|
``common.ChildB.m2m`` field will be ``common_childb_related``, and finally the
|
|
reverse name of the ``rare.ChildB.m2m`` field will be ``rare_childb_related``.
|
|
It is up to you how you use the ``'%(class)s'`` and ``'%(app_label)s`` portion
|
|
to construct your related name, but if you forget to use it, Django will raise
|
|
errors when you perform system checks (or run :djadmin:`migrate`).
|
|
|
|
If you don't specify a :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name`
|
|
attribute for a field in an abstract base class, the default reverse name will
|
|
be the name of the child class followed by ``'_set'``, just as it normally
|
|
would be if you'd declared the field directly on the child class. For example,
|
|
in the above code, if the :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name`
|
|
attribute was omitted, the reverse name for the ``m2m`` field would be
|
|
``childa_set`` in the ``ChildA`` case and ``childb_set`` for the ``ChildB``
|
|
field.
|
|
|
|
.. _multi-table-inheritance:
|
|
|
|
Multi-table inheritance
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
The second type of model inheritance supported by Django is when each model in
|
|
the hierarchy is a model all by itself. Each model corresponds to its own
|
|
database table and can be queried and created individually. The inheritance
|
|
relationship introduces links between the child model and each of its parents
|
|
(via an automatically-created :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField`).
|
|
For example::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Place(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=50)
|
|
address = models.CharField(max_length=80)
|
|
|
|
class Restaurant(Place):
|
|
serves_hot_dogs = models.BooleanField()
|
|
serves_pizza = models.BooleanField()
|
|
|
|
All of the fields of ``Place`` will also be available in ``Restaurant``,
|
|
although the data will reside in a different database table. So these are both
|
|
possible::
|
|
|
|
>>> Place.objects.filter(name="Bob's Cafe")
|
|
>>> Restaurant.objects.filter(name="Bob's Cafe")
|
|
|
|
If you have a ``Place`` that is also a ``Restaurant``, you can get from the
|
|
``Place`` object to the ``Restaurant`` object by using the lower-case version
|
|
of the model name::
|
|
|
|
>>> p = Place.objects.get(id=12)
|
|
# If p is a Restaurant object, this will give the child class:
|
|
>>> p.restaurant
|
|
<Restaurant: ...>
|
|
|
|
However, if ``p`` in the above example was *not* a ``Restaurant`` (it had been
|
|
created directly as a ``Place`` object or was the parent of some other class),
|
|
referring to ``p.restaurant`` would raise a Restaurant.DoesNotExist exception.
|
|
|
|
``Meta`` and multi-table inheritance
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
In the multi-table inheritance situation, it doesn't make sense for a child
|
|
class to inherit from its parent's :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` class. All the :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` options
|
|
have already been applied to the parent class and applying them again would
|
|
normally only lead to contradictory behavior (this is in contrast with the
|
|
abstract base class case, where the base class doesn't exist in its own
|
|
right).
|
|
|
|
So a child model does not have access to its parent's :ref:`Meta
|
|
<meta-options>` class. However, there are a few limited cases where the child
|
|
inherits behavior from the parent: if the child does not specify an
|
|
:attr:`~django.db.models.Options.ordering` attribute or a
|
|
:attr:`~django.db.models.Options.get_latest_by` attribute, it will inherit
|
|
these from its parent.
|
|
|
|
If the parent has an ordering and you don't want the child to have any natural
|
|
ordering, you can explicitly disable it::
|
|
|
|
class ChildModel(ParentModel):
|
|
# ...
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
# Remove parent's ordering effect
|
|
ordering = []
|
|
|
|
Inheritance and reverse relations
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Because multi-table inheritance uses an implicit
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` to link the child and
|
|
the parent, it's possible to move from the parent down to the child,
|
|
as in the above example. However, this uses up the name that is the
|
|
default :attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name` value for
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey` and
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` relations. If you
|
|
are putting those types of relations on a subclass of another model,
|
|
you **must** specify the
|
|
:attr:`~django.db.models.ForeignKey.related_name` attribute on each
|
|
such field. If you forget, Django will raise an error when you run
|
|
:djadmin:`check` or :djadmin:`migrate`.
|
|
|
|
For example, using the above ``Place`` class again, let's create another
|
|
subclass with a :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField`::
|
|
|
|
class Supplier(Place):
|
|
# Must specify related_name on all relations.
|
|
customers = models.ManyToManyField(Restaurant, related_name='provider')
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifying the parent link field
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
As mentioned, Django will automatically create a
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` linking your child
|
|
class back any non-abstract parent models. If you want to control the
|
|
name of the attribute linking back to the parent, you can create your
|
|
own :class:`~django.db.models.OneToOneField` and set
|
|
:attr:`parent_link=True <django.db.models.OneToOneField.parent_link>`
|
|
to indicate that your field is the link back to the parent class.
|
|
|
|
.. _proxy-models:
|
|
|
|
Proxy models
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
When using :ref:`multi-table inheritance <multi-table-inheritance>`, a new
|
|
database table is created for each subclass of a model. This is usually the
|
|
desired behavior, since the subclass needs a place to store any additional
|
|
data fields that are not present on the base class. Sometimes, however, you
|
|
only want to change the Python behavior of a model -- perhaps to change the
|
|
default manager, or add a new method.
|
|
|
|
This is what proxy model inheritance is for: creating a *proxy* for the
|
|
original model. You can create, delete and update instances of the proxy model
|
|
and all the data will be saved as if you were using the original (non-proxied)
|
|
model. The difference is that you can change things like the default model
|
|
ordering or the default manager in the proxy, without having to alter the
|
|
original.
|
|
|
|
Proxy models are declared like normal models. You tell Django that it's a
|
|
proxy model by setting the :attr:`~django.db.models.Options.proxy` attribute of
|
|
the ``Meta`` class to ``True``.
|
|
|
|
For example, suppose you want to add a method to the ``Person`` model. You can do it like this::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class Person(models.Model):
|
|
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
|
|
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=30)
|
|
|
|
class MyPerson(Person):
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
proxy = True
|
|
|
|
def do_something(self):
|
|
# ...
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
The ``MyPerson`` class operates on the same database table as its parent
|
|
``Person`` class. In particular, any new instances of ``Person`` will also be
|
|
accessible through ``MyPerson``, and vice-versa::
|
|
|
|
>>> p = Person.objects.create(first_name="foobar")
|
|
>>> MyPerson.objects.get(first_name="foobar")
|
|
<MyPerson: foobar>
|
|
|
|
You could also use a proxy model to define a different default ordering on
|
|
a model. You might not always want to order the ``Person`` model, but regularly
|
|
order by the ``last_name`` attribute when you use the proxy. This is easy::
|
|
|
|
class OrderedPerson(Person):
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
ordering = ["last_name"]
|
|
proxy = True
|
|
|
|
Now normal ``Person`` queries will be unordered
|
|
and ``OrderedPerson`` queries will be ordered by ``last_name``.
|
|
|
|
QuerySets still return the model that was requested
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
There is no way to have Django return, say, a ``MyPerson`` object whenever you
|
|
query for ``Person`` objects. A queryset for ``Person`` objects will return
|
|
those types of objects. The whole point of proxy objects is that code relying
|
|
on the original ``Person`` will use those and your own code can use the
|
|
extensions you included (that no other code is relying on anyway). It is not
|
|
a way to replace the ``Person`` (or any other) model everywhere with something
|
|
of your own creation.
|
|
|
|
Base class restrictions
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
A proxy model must inherit from exactly one non-abstract model class. You
|
|
can't inherit from multiple non-abstract models as the proxy model doesn't
|
|
provide any connection between the rows in the different database tables. A
|
|
proxy model can inherit from any number of abstract model classes, providing
|
|
they do *not* define any model fields.
|
|
|
|
Proxy models inherit any ``Meta`` options that they don't define from their
|
|
non-abstract model parent (the model they are proxying for).
|
|
|
|
Proxy model managers
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
If you don't specify any model managers on a proxy model, it inherits the
|
|
managers from its model parents. If you define a manager on the proxy model,
|
|
it will become the default, although any managers defined on the parent
|
|
classes will still be available.
|
|
|
|
Continuing our example from above, you could change the default manager used
|
|
when you query the ``Person`` model like this::
|
|
|
|
from django.db import models
|
|
|
|
class NewManager(models.Manager):
|
|
# ...
|
|
pass
|
|
|
|
class MyPerson(Person):
|
|
objects = NewManager()
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
proxy = True
|
|
|
|
If you wanted to add a new manager to the Proxy, without replacing the
|
|
existing default, you can use the techniques described in the :ref:`custom
|
|
manager <custom-managers-and-inheritance>` documentation: create a base class
|
|
containing the new managers and inherit that after the primary base class::
|
|
|
|
# Create an abstract class for the new manager.
|
|
class ExtraManagers(models.Model):
|
|
secondary = NewManager()
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
abstract = True
|
|
|
|
class MyPerson(Person, ExtraManagers):
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
proxy = True
|
|
|
|
You probably won't need to do this very often, but, when you do, it's
|
|
possible.
|
|
|
|
.. _proxy-vs-unmanaged-models:
|
|
|
|
Differences between proxy inheritance and unmanaged models
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Proxy model inheritance might look fairly similar to creating an unmanaged
|
|
model, using the :attr:`~django.db.models.Options.managed` attribute on a
|
|
model's ``Meta`` class. The two alternatives are not quite the same and it's
|
|
worth considering which one you should use.
|
|
|
|
One difference is that you can (and, in fact, must unless you want an empty
|
|
model) specify model fields on models with ``Meta.managed=False``. You could,
|
|
with careful setting of :attr:`Meta.db_table
|
|
<django.db.models.Options.db_table>` create an unmanaged model that shadowed
|
|
an existing model and add Python methods to it. However, that would be very
|
|
repetitive and fragile as you need to keep both copies synchronized if you
|
|
make any changes.
|
|
|
|
The other difference that is more important for proxy models, is how model
|
|
managers are handled. Proxy models are intended to behave exactly like the
|
|
model they are proxying for. So they inherit the parent model's managers,
|
|
including the default manager. In the normal multi-table model inheritance
|
|
case, children do not inherit managers from their parents as the custom
|
|
managers aren't always appropriate when extra fields are involved. The
|
|
:ref:`manager documentation <custom-managers-and-inheritance>` has more
|
|
details about this latter case.
|
|
|
|
When these two features were implemented, attempts were made to squash them
|
|
into a single option. It turned out that interactions with inheritance, in
|
|
general, and managers, in particular, made the API very complicated and
|
|
potentially difficult to understand and use. It turned out that two options
|
|
were needed in any case, so the current separation arose.
|
|
|
|
So, the general rules are:
|
|
|
|
1. If you are mirroring an existing model or database table and don't want
|
|
all the original database table columns, use ``Meta.managed=False``.
|
|
That option is normally useful for modeling database views and tables
|
|
not under the control of Django.
|
|
2. If you are wanting to change the Python-only behavior of a model, but
|
|
keep all the same fields as in the original, use ``Meta.proxy=True``.
|
|
This sets things up so that the proxy model is an exact copy of the
|
|
storage structure of the original model when data is saved.
|
|
|
|
Multiple inheritance
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
Just as with Python's subclassing, it's possible for a Django model to inherit
|
|
from multiple parent models. Keep in mind that normal Python name resolution
|
|
rules apply. The first base class that a particular name (e.g. :ref:`Meta
|
|
<meta-options>`) appears in will be the one that is used; for example, this
|
|
means that if multiple parents contain a :ref:`Meta <meta-options>` class,
|
|
only the first one is going to be used, and all others will be ignored.
|
|
|
|
Generally, you won't need to inherit from multiple parents. The main use-case
|
|
where this is useful is for "mix-in" classes: adding a particular extra
|
|
field or method to every class that inherits the mix-in. Try to keep your
|
|
inheritance hierarchies as simple and straightforward as possible so that you
|
|
won't have to struggle to work out where a particular piece of information is
|
|
coming from.
|
|
|
|
Field name "hiding" is not permitted
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
In normal Python class inheritance, it is permissible for a child class to
|
|
override any attribute from the parent class. In Django, this is not permitted
|
|
for attributes that are :class:`~django.db.models.Field` instances (at
|
|
least, not at the moment). If a base class has a field called ``author``, you
|
|
cannot create another model field called ``author`` in any class that inherits
|
|
from that base class.
|
|
|
|
Overriding fields in a parent model leads to difficulties in areas such as
|
|
initializing new instances (specifying which field is being initialized in
|
|
``Model.__init__``) and serialization. These are features which normal Python
|
|
class inheritance doesn't have to deal with in quite the same way, so the
|
|
difference between Django model inheritance and Python class inheritance isn't
|
|
arbitrary.
|
|
|
|
This restriction only applies to attributes which are
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.Field` instances. Normal Python attributes
|
|
can be overridden if you wish. It also only applies to the name of the
|
|
attribute as Python sees it: if you are manually specifying the database
|
|
column name, you can have the same column name appearing in both a child and
|
|
an ancestor model for multi-table inheritance (they are columns in two
|
|
different database tables).
|
|
|
|
Django will raise a :exc:`~django.core.exceptions.FieldError` if you override
|
|
any model field in any ancestor model.
|