mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-23 17:46:27 +00:00
5fb6667036
Ensure to read the documentation before blindly enabling this: requires some code audits first, but might well be worth it for busy sites. Thanks to nicferrier, iamseb and Richard Davies for help with this patch. git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10029 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
552 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
552 lines
23 KiB
Plaintext
.. _ref-databases:
|
|
|
|
===============================
|
|
Notes about supported databases
|
|
===============================
|
|
|
|
Django attempts to support as many features as possible on all database
|
|
backends. However, not all database backends are alike, and we've had to make
|
|
design decisions on which features to support and which assumptions we can make
|
|
safely.
|
|
|
|
This file describes some of the features that might be relevant to Django
|
|
usage. Of course, it is not intended as a replacement for server-specific
|
|
documentation or reference manuals.
|
|
|
|
.. postgresql-notes:
|
|
|
|
PostgreSQL notes
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
PostgreSQL 8.2 to 8.2.4
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
The implementation of the population statistics aggregates ``STDDEV_POP`` and
|
|
``VAR_POP`` that shipped with PostgreSQL 8.2 to 8.2.4 are `known to be
|
|
faulty`_. Users of these releases of PostgreSQL are advised to upgrade to
|
|
`Release 8.2.5`_ or later. Django will raise a ``NotImplementedError`` if you
|
|
attempt to use the ``StdDev(sample=False)`` or ``Variance(sample=False)``
|
|
aggregate with an database backend falls within the affected release range.
|
|
|
|
.. _known to be faulty: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2007-07/msg00046.php
|
|
.. _Release 8.2.5: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/release-8-2-5.html
|
|
|
|
Transaction handling
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
:ref:`By default <topics-db-transactions>`, Django starts a transaction when a
|
|
database connection if first used and commits the result at the end of the
|
|
request/response handling. The PostgreSQL backends normally operate the same
|
|
as any other Django backend in this respect.
|
|
|
|
Autocommit mode
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.1
|
|
|
|
If your application is particularly read-heavy and doesn't make many database
|
|
writes, the overhead of a constantly open transaction can sometimes be
|
|
noticeable. For those situations, if you're using the ``postgresql_psycopg2``
|
|
backend, you can configure Django to use *"autocommit"* behavior for the
|
|
connection, meaning that each database operation will normally be in its own
|
|
transaction, rather than having the transaction extend over multiple
|
|
operations. In this case, you can still manually start a transaction if you're
|
|
doing something that requires consistency across multiple database operations.
|
|
The autocommit behavior is enabled by setting the ``autocommit`` key in the
|
|
:setting:`DATABASE_OPTIONS` setting::
|
|
|
|
DATABASE_OPTIONS = {
|
|
"autocommit": True,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
In this configuration, Django still ensures that :ref:`delete()
|
|
<topics-db-queries-delete>` and :ref:`update() <topics-db-queries-update>`
|
|
queries run inside a single transaction, so that either all the affected
|
|
objects are changed or none of them are.
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: This is database-level autocommit
|
|
|
|
This functionality is not the same as the
|
|
:ref:`topics-db-transactions-autocommit` decorator. That decorator is a
|
|
Django-level implementation that commits automatically after data changing
|
|
operations. The feature enabled using the :setting:`DATABASE_OPTIONS`
|
|
settings provides autocommit behavior at the database adapter level. It
|
|
commits after *every* operation.
|
|
|
|
If you are using this feature and performing an operation akin to delete or
|
|
updating that requires multiple operations, you are strongly recommended to
|
|
wrap you operations in manual transaction handling to ensure data consistency.
|
|
You should also audit your existing code for any instances of this behavior
|
|
before enabling this feature. It's faster, but it provides less automatic
|
|
protection for multi-call operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _mysql-notes:
|
|
|
|
MySQL notes
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
Django expects the database to support transactions, referential integrity,
|
|
and Unicode support (UTF-8 encoding). Fortunately, MySQL_ has all these
|
|
features as available as far back as 3.23. While it may be possible to use
|
|
3.23 or 4.0, you'll probably have less trouble if you use 4.1 or 5.0.
|
|
|
|
MySQL 4.1
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
`MySQL 4.1`_ has greatly improved support for character sets. It is possible to
|
|
set different default character sets on the database, table, and column.
|
|
Previous versions have only a server-wide character set setting. It's also the
|
|
first version where the character set can be changed on the fly. 4.1 also has
|
|
support for views, but Django currently doesn't use views.
|
|
|
|
MySQL 5.0
|
|
---------
|
|
|
|
`MySQL 5.0`_ adds the ``information_schema`` database, which contains detailed
|
|
data on all database schema. Django's ``inspectdb`` feature uses this
|
|
``information_schema`` if it's available. 5.0 also has support for stored
|
|
procedures, but Django currently doesn't use stored procedures.
|
|
|
|
.. _MySQL: http://www.mysql.com/
|
|
.. _MySQL 4.1: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/4.1/en/index.html
|
|
.. _MySQL 5.0: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/index.html
|
|
|
|
Storage engines
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
MySQL has several `storage engines`_ (previously called table types). You can
|
|
change the default storage engine in the server configuration.
|
|
|
|
The default engine is MyISAM_ [#]_. The main drawback of MyISAM is that it
|
|
doesn't currently support transactions or foreign keys. On the plus side, it's
|
|
currently the only engine that supports full-text indexing and searching.
|
|
|
|
The InnoDB_ engine is fully transactional and supports foreign key references.
|
|
|
|
The BDB_ engine, like InnoDB, is also fully transactional and supports foreign
|
|
key references. However, its use seems to be deprecated.
|
|
|
|
`Other storage engines`_, including SolidDB_ and Falcon_, are on the horizon.
|
|
For now, InnoDB is probably your best choice.
|
|
|
|
.. _storage engines: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/storage-engines.html
|
|
.. _MyISAM: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/myisam-storage-engine.html
|
|
.. _BDB: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/bdb-storage-engine.html
|
|
.. _InnoDB: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/innodb.html
|
|
.. _Other storage engines: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/storage-engines-other.html
|
|
.. _SolidDB: http://forge.mysql.com/projects/project.php?id=139
|
|
.. _Falcon: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/falcon/en/index.html
|
|
|
|
.. [#] Unless this was changed by the packager of your MySQL package. We've
|
|
had reports that the Windows Community Server installer sets up InnoDB as
|
|
the default storage engine, for example.
|
|
|
|
MySQLdb
|
|
-------
|
|
|
|
`MySQLdb`_ is the Python interface to MySQL. Version 1.2.1p2 or later is
|
|
required for full MySQL support in Django.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
If you see ``ImportError: cannot import name ImmutableSet`` when trying to
|
|
use Django, your MySQLdb installation may contain an outdated ``sets.py``
|
|
file that conflicts with the built-in module of the same name from Python
|
|
2.4 and later. To fix this, verify that you have installed MySQLdb version
|
|
1.2.1p2 or newer, then delete the ``sets.py`` file in the MySQLdb
|
|
directory that was left by an earlier version.
|
|
|
|
.. _MySQLdb: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mysql-python
|
|
|
|
Creating your database
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
You can `create your database`_ using the command-line tools and this SQL::
|
|
|
|
CREATE DATABASE <dbname> CHARACTER SET utf8;
|
|
|
|
This ensures all tables and columns will use UTF-8 by default.
|
|
|
|
.. _create your database: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/create-database.html
|
|
|
|
.. _mysql-collation:
|
|
|
|
Collation settings
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The collation setting for a column controls the order in which data is sorted
|
|
as well as what strings compare as equal. It can be set on a database-wide
|
|
level and also per-table and per-column. This is `documented thoroughly`_ in
|
|
the MySQL documentation. In all cases, you set the collation by directly
|
|
manipulating the database tables; Django doesn't provide a way to set this on
|
|
the model definition.
|
|
|
|
.. _documented thoroughly: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/charset.html
|
|
|
|
By default, with a UTF-8 database, MySQL will use the
|
|
``utf8_general_ci_swedish`` collation. This results in all string equality
|
|
comparisons being done in a *case-insensitive* manner. That is, ``"Fred"`` and
|
|
``"freD"`` are considered equal at the database level. If you have a unique
|
|
constraint on a field, it would be illegal to try to insert both ``"aa"`` and
|
|
``"AA"`` into the same column, since they compare as equal (and, hence,
|
|
non-unique) with the default collation.
|
|
|
|
In many cases, this default will not be a problem. However, if you really want
|
|
case-sensitive comparisons on a particular column or table, you would change
|
|
the column or table to use the ``utf8_bin`` collation. The main thing to be
|
|
aware of in this case is that if you are using MySQLdb 1.2.2, the database backend in Django will then return
|
|
bytestrings (instead of unicode strings) for any character fields it returns
|
|
receive from the database. This is a strong variation from Django's normal
|
|
practice of *always* returning unicode strings. It is up to you, the
|
|
developer, to handle the fact that you will receive bytestrings if you
|
|
configure your table(s) to use ``utf8_bin`` collation. Django itself should work
|
|
smoothly with such columns, but if your code must be prepared to call
|
|
``django.utils.encoding.smart_unicode()`` at times if it really wants to work
|
|
with consistent data -- Django will not do this for you (the database backend
|
|
layer and the model population layer are separated internally so the database
|
|
layer doesn't know it needs to make this conversion in this one particular
|
|
case).
|
|
|
|
If you're using MySQLdb 1.2.1p2, Django's standard
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.CharField` class will return unicode strings even
|
|
with ``utf8_bin`` collation. However, :class:`~django.db.models.TextField`
|
|
fields will be returned as an ``array.array`` instance (from Python's standard
|
|
``array`` module). There isn't a lot Django can do about that, since, again,
|
|
the information needed to make the necessary conversions isn't available when
|
|
the data is read in from the database. This problem was `fixed in MySQLdb
|
|
1.2.2`_, so if you want to use :class:`~django.db.models.TextField` with
|
|
``utf8_bin`` collation, upgrading to version 1.2.2 and then dealing with the
|
|
bytestrings (which shouldn't be too difficult) is the recommended solution.
|
|
|
|
Should you decide to use ``utf8_bin`` collation for some of your tables with
|
|
MySQLdb 1.2.1p2, you should still use ``utf8_collation_ci_swedish`` (the
|
|
default) collation for the :class:`django.contrib.sessions.models.Session`
|
|
table (usually called ``django_session`` and the table
|
|
:class:`django.contrib.admin.models.LogEntry` table (usually called
|
|
``django_admin_log``). Those are the two standard tables that use
|
|
:class:`~django.db.model.TextField` internally.
|
|
|
|
.. _fixed in MySQLdb 1.2.2: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1495765&group_id=22307&atid=374932
|
|
|
|
Connecting to the database
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Refer to the :ref:`settings documentation <ref-settings>`.
|
|
|
|
Connection settings are used in this order:
|
|
|
|
1. :setting:`DATABASE_OPTIONS`.
|
|
2. :setting:`DATABASE_NAME`, :setting:`DATABASE_USER`,
|
|
:setting:`DATABASE_PASSWORD`, :setting:`DATABASE_HOST`,
|
|
:setting:`DATABASE_PORT`
|
|
3. MySQL option files.
|
|
|
|
In other words, if you set the name of the database in ``DATABASE_OPTIONS``,
|
|
this will take precedence over ``DATABASE_NAME``, which would override
|
|
anything in a `MySQL option file`_.
|
|
|
|
Here's a sample configuration which uses a MySQL option file::
|
|
|
|
# settings.py
|
|
DATABASE_ENGINE = "mysql"
|
|
DATABASE_OPTIONS = {
|
|
'read_default_file': '/path/to/my.cnf',
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
# my.cnf
|
|
[client]
|
|
database = DATABASE_NAME
|
|
user = DATABASE_USER
|
|
password = DATABASE_PASSWORD
|
|
default-character-set = utf8
|
|
|
|
Several other MySQLdb connection options may be useful, such as ``ssl``,
|
|
``use_unicode``, ``init_command``, and ``sql_mode``. Consult the
|
|
`MySQLdb documentation`_ for more details.
|
|
|
|
.. _MySQL option file: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/option-files.html
|
|
.. _MySQLdb documentation: http://mysql-python.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|
|
Creating your tables
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
When Django generates the schema, it doesn't specify a storage engine, so
|
|
tables will be created with whatever default storage engine your database
|
|
server is configured for. The easiest solution is to set your database server's
|
|
default storage engine to the desired engine.
|
|
|
|
If you're using a hosting service and can't change your server's default
|
|
storage engine, you have a couple of options.
|
|
|
|
* After the tables are created, execute an ``ALTER TABLE`` statement to
|
|
convert a table to a new storage engine (such as InnoDB)::
|
|
|
|
ALTER TABLE <tablename> ENGINE=INNODB;
|
|
|
|
This can be tedious if you have a lot of tables.
|
|
|
|
* Another option is to use the ``init_command`` option for MySQLdb prior to
|
|
creating your tables::
|
|
|
|
DATABASE_OPTIONS = {
|
|
"init_command": "SET storage_engine=INNODB",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
This sets the default storage engine upon connecting to the database.
|
|
After your tables have been created, you should remove this option.
|
|
|
|
* Another method for changing the storage engine is described in
|
|
AlterModelOnSyncDB_.
|
|
|
|
.. _AlterModelOnSyncDB: http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/AlterModelOnSyncDB
|
|
|
|
Notes on specific fields
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Boolean fields
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Since MySQL doesn't have a direct ``BOOLEAN`` column type, Django uses a
|
|
``TINYINT`` column with values of ``1`` and ``0`` to store values for the
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.BooleanField` model field. Refer to the documentation
|
|
of that field for more details, but usually this won't be something that will
|
|
matter unless you're printing out the field values and are expecting to see
|
|
``True`` and ``False.``.
|
|
|
|
Character fields
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Any fields that are stored with ``VARCHAR`` column types have their
|
|
``max_length`` restricted to 255 characters if you are using ``unique=True``
|
|
for the field. This affects :class:`~django.db.models.CharField`,
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.SlugField` and
|
|
:class:`~django.db.models.CommaSeparatedIntegerField`.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, if you are using a version of MySQL prior to 5.0.3, all of those
|
|
column types have a maximum length restriction of 255 characters, regardless
|
|
of whether ``unique=True`` is specified or not.
|
|
|
|
.. _sqlite-notes:
|
|
|
|
SQLite notes
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
SQLite_ provides an excellent development alternative for applications that
|
|
are predominantly read-only or require a smaller installation footprint. As
|
|
with all database servers, though, there are some differences that are
|
|
specific to SQLite that you should be aware of.
|
|
|
|
.. _SQLite: http://www.sqlite.org/
|
|
|
|
.. _sqlite-string-matching:
|
|
|
|
String matching for non-ASCII strings
|
|
--------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
SQLite doesn't support case-insensitive matching for non-ASCII strings. Some
|
|
possible workarounds for this are `documented at sqlite.org`_, but they are
|
|
not utilised by the default SQLite backend in Django. Therefore, if you are
|
|
using the ``iexact`` lookup type in your queryset filters, be aware that it
|
|
will not work as expected for non-ASCII strings.
|
|
|
|
.. _documented at sqlite.org: http://www.sqlite.org/faq.html#q18
|
|
|
|
Versions prior to 3.3.6
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
Versions of SQLite 3.3.5 and older `contain a bug`_ when handling ``ORDER BY``
|
|
parameters. This can cause problems when you use the ``select`` parameter for
|
|
the ``extra()`` QuerySet method. The bug can be identified by the error message
|
|
``OperationalError: ORDER BY terms must not be non-integer constants``. The
|
|
problem can be solved updating SQLite to version 3.3.6 or newer, possibly also
|
|
updating the ``pysqlite2`` Python module in the process.
|
|
|
|
.. _contain a bug: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=1768
|
|
|
|
This has a very low impact because 3.3.6 was released in April 2006, so most
|
|
current binary distributions for different platforms include newer version of
|
|
SQLite usable from Python through either the ``pysqlite2`` or the ``sqlite3``
|
|
modules.
|
|
|
|
However, in the case of Windows, the official binary distribution of the stable
|
|
release of Python 2.5 (2.5.2, as of this writing) includes SQLite 3.3.4, so the bug can
|
|
make itself evident in that platform. There are (as of Django 1.0) even three
|
|
tests in the Django test suite that will fail when run under this setup. As
|
|
described above, this can be solved by downloading and installing a newer
|
|
version of ``pysqlite2`` (``pysqlite-2.x.x.win32-py2.5.exe``) that includes and
|
|
uses a newer version of SQLite. Python 2.6 ships with a newer version of
|
|
SQLite and is not affected by this issue.
|
|
|
|
If you are in such platform and find yourself in the need to update
|
|
``pysqlite``/SQLite, you will also need to manually modify the
|
|
``django/db/backends/sqlite3/base.py`` file in the Django source tree so it
|
|
attempts to import ``pysqlite2`` before than ``sqlite3`` and so it can take
|
|
advantage of the new ``pysqlite2``/SQLite versions.
|
|
|
|
Version 3.5.9
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
The Ubuntu "Intrepid Ibex" SQLite 3.5.9-3 package contains a bug that causes
|
|
problems with the evaluation of query expressions. If you are using Ubuntu
|
|
"Intrepid Ibex", you will need to find an alternate source for SQLite
|
|
packages, or install SQLite from source.
|
|
|
|
At one time, Debian Lenny shipped with the same malfunctioning SQLite 3.5.9-3
|
|
package. However the Debian project has subsequently issued updated versions
|
|
of the SQLite package that correct these bugs. If you find you are getting
|
|
unexpected results under Debian, ensure you have updated your SQLite package
|
|
to 3.5.9-5 or later.
|
|
|
|
The problem does not appear to exist with other versions of SQLite packaged
|
|
with other operating systems.
|
|
|
|
Version 3.6.2
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
SQLite version 3.6.2 (released August 30, 2008) introduced a bug into ``SELECT
|
|
DISTINCT`` handling that is triggered by, amongst other things, Django's
|
|
``DateQuerySet`` (returned by the ``dates()`` method on a queryset).
|
|
|
|
You should avoid using this version of SQLite with Django. Either upgrade to
|
|
3.6.3 (released September 22, 2008) or later, or downgrade to an earlier
|
|
version of SQLite.
|
|
|
|
.. _oracle-notes:
|
|
|
|
Oracle notes
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Django supports `Oracle Database Server`_ versions 9i and
|
|
higher. Oracle version 10g or later is required to use Django's
|
|
``regex`` and ``iregex`` query operators. You will also need at least
|
|
version 4.3.1 of the `cx_Oracle`_ Python driver.
|
|
|
|
Note that due to a Unicode-corruption bug in ``cx_Oracle`` 5.0, that
|
|
version of the driver should **not** be used with Django;
|
|
``cx_Oracle`` 5.0.1 resolved this issue, so if you'd like to use a
|
|
more recent ``cx_Oracle``, use version 5.0.1.
|
|
|
|
.. _`Oracle Database Server`: http://www.oracle.com/
|
|
.. _`cx_Oracle`: http://cx-oracle.sourceforge.net/
|
|
|
|
In order for the ``python manage.py syncdb`` command to work, your Oracle
|
|
database user must have privileges to run the following commands:
|
|
|
|
* CREATE TABLE
|
|
* CREATE SEQUENCE
|
|
* CREATE PROCEDURE
|
|
* CREATE TRIGGER
|
|
|
|
To run Django's test suite, the user needs these *additional* privileges:
|
|
|
|
* CREATE USER
|
|
* DROP USER
|
|
* CREATE TABLESPACE
|
|
* DROP TABLESPACE
|
|
|
|
Connecting to the database
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
Your Django settings.py file should look something like this for Oracle::
|
|
|
|
DATABASE_ENGINE = 'oracle'
|
|
DATABASE_NAME = 'xe'
|
|
DATABASE_USER = 'a_user'
|
|
DATABASE_PASSWORD = 'a_password'
|
|
DATABASE_HOST = ''
|
|
DATABASE_PORT = ''
|
|
|
|
If you don't use a ``tnsnames.ora`` file or a similar naming method that
|
|
recognizes the SID ("xe" in this example), then fill in both
|
|
:setting:`DATABASE_HOST` and :setting:`DATABASE_PORT` like so::
|
|
|
|
DATABASE_ENGINE = 'oracle'
|
|
DATABASE_NAME = 'xe'
|
|
DATABASE_USER = 'a_user'
|
|
DATABASE_PASSWORD = 'a_password'
|
|
DATABASE_HOST = 'dbprod01ned.mycompany.com'
|
|
DATABASE_PORT = '1540'
|
|
|
|
You should supply both :setting:`DATABASE_HOST` and :setting:`DATABASE_PORT`, or leave both
|
|
as empty strings.
|
|
|
|
Tablespace options
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
A common paradigm for optimizing performance in Oracle-based systems is the
|
|
use of `tablespaces`_ to organize disk layout. The Oracle backend supports
|
|
this use case by adding ``db_tablespace`` options to the ``Meta`` and
|
|
``Field`` classes. (When you use a backend that lacks support for tablespaces,
|
|
Django ignores these options.)
|
|
|
|
.. _`tablespaces`: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablespace
|
|
|
|
A tablespace can be specified for the table(s) generated by a model by
|
|
supplying the ``db_tablespace`` option inside the model's ``class Meta``.
|
|
Additionally, you can pass the ``db_tablespace`` option to a ``Field``
|
|
constructor to specify an alternate tablespace for the ``Field``'s column
|
|
index. If no index would be created for the column, the ``db_tablespace``
|
|
option is ignored::
|
|
|
|
class TablespaceExample(models.Model):
|
|
name = models.CharField(max_length=30, db_index=True, db_tablespace="indexes")
|
|
data = models.CharField(max_length=255, db_index=True)
|
|
edges = models.ManyToManyField(to="self", db_tablespace="indexes")
|
|
|
|
class Meta:
|
|
db_tablespace = "tables"
|
|
|
|
In this example, the tables generated by the ``TablespaceExample`` model
|
|
(i.e., the model table and the many-to-many table) would be stored in the
|
|
``tables`` tablespace. The index for the name field and the indexes on the
|
|
many-to-many table would be stored in the ``indexes`` tablespace. The ``data``
|
|
field would also generate an index, but no tablespace for it is specified, so
|
|
it would be stored in the model tablespace ``tables`` by default.
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.0
|
|
|
|
Use the :setting:`DEFAULT_TABLESPACE` and :setting:`DEFAULT_INDEX_TABLESPACE`
|
|
settings to specify default values for the db_tablespace options.
|
|
These are useful for setting a tablespace for the built-in Django apps and
|
|
other applications whose code you cannot control.
|
|
|
|
Django does not create the tablespaces for you. Please refer to `Oracle's
|
|
documentation`_ for details on creating and managing tablespaces.
|
|
|
|
.. _`Oracle's documentation`: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/statements_7003.htm#SQLRF01403
|
|
|
|
Naming issues
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
Oracle imposes a name length limit of 30 characters. To accommodate this, the
|
|
backend truncates database identifiers to fit, replacing the final four
|
|
characters of the truncated name with a repeatable MD5 hash value.
|
|
|
|
NULL and empty strings
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
Django generally prefers to use the empty string ('') rather than
|
|
NULL, but Oracle treats both identically. To get around this, the
|
|
Oracle backend coerces the ``null=True`` option on fields that have
|
|
the empty string as a possible value. When fetching from the database,
|
|
it is assumed that a NULL value in one of these fields really means
|
|
the empty string, and the data is silently converted to reflect this
|
|
assumption.
|
|
|
|
``TextField`` limitations
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
The Oracle backend stores ``TextFields`` as ``NCLOB`` columns. Oracle imposes
|
|
some limitations on the usage of such LOB columns in general:
|
|
|
|
* LOB columns may not be used as primary keys.
|
|
|
|
* LOB columns may not be used in indexes.
|
|
|
|
* LOB columns may not be used in a ``SELECT DISTINCT`` list. This means that
|
|
attempting to use the ``QuerySet.distinct`` method on a model that
|
|
includes ``TextField`` columns will result in an error when run against
|
|
Oracle. A workaround to this is to keep ``TextField`` columns out of any
|
|
models that you foresee performing ``distinct()`` queries on, and to
|
|
include the ``TextField`` in a related model instead.
|