mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-28 16:16:12 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			281 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			281 lines
		
	
	
		
			12 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ====================
 | |
| Asynchronous support
 | |
| ====================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: asgiref.sync
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django has support for writing asynchronous ("async") views, along with an
 | |
| entirely async-enabled request stack if you are running under
 | |
| :doc:`ASGI </howto/deployment/asgi/index>`. Async views will still work under
 | |
| WSGI, but with performance penalties, and without the ability to have efficient
 | |
| long-running requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We're still working on async support for the ORM and other parts of Django.
 | |
| You can expect to see this in future releases. For now, you can use the
 | |
| :func:`sync_to_async` adapter to interact with the sync parts of Django.
 | |
| There is also a whole range of async-native Python libraries that you can
 | |
| integrate with.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Async views
 | |
| ===========
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any view can be declared async by making the callable part of it return a
 | |
| coroutine - commonly, this is done using ``async def``. For a function-based
 | |
| view, this means declaring the whole view using ``async def``. For a
 | |
| class-based view, this means making its ``__call__()`` method an ``async def``
 | |
| (not its ``__init__()`` or ``as_view()``).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Django uses ``asyncio.iscoroutinefunction`` to test if your view is
 | |
|     asynchronous or not. If you implement your own method of returning a
 | |
|     coroutine, ensure you set the ``_is_coroutine`` attribute of the view
 | |
|     to ``asyncio.coroutines._is_coroutine`` so this function returns ``True``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Under a WSGI server, async views will run in their own, one-off event loop.
 | |
| This means you can use async features, like concurrent async HTTP requests,
 | |
| without any issues, but you will not get the benefits of an async stack.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The main benefits are the ability to service hundreds of connections without
 | |
| using Python threads. This allows you to use slow streaming, long-polling, and
 | |
| other exciting response types.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to use these, you will need to deploy Django using
 | |
| :doc:`ASGI </howto/deployment/asgi/index>` instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     You will only get the benefits of a fully-asynchronous request stack if you
 | |
|     have *no synchronous middleware* loaded into your site. If there is a piece
 | |
|     of synchronous middleware, then Django must use a thread per request to
 | |
|     safely emulate a synchronous environment for it.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Middleware can be built to support :ref:`both sync and async
 | |
|     <async-middleware>` contexts. Some of Django's middleware is built like
 | |
|     this, but not all. To see what middleware Django has to adapt, you can turn
 | |
|     on debug logging for the ``django.request`` logger and look for log
 | |
|     messages about *"Synchronous middleware ... adapted"*.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In both ASGI and WSGI mode, you can still safely use asynchronous support to
 | |
| run code concurrently rather than serially. This is especially handy when
 | |
| dealing with external APIs or data stores.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to call a part of Django that is still synchronous, like the ORM,
 | |
| you will need to wrap it in a :func:`sync_to_async` call. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async
 | |
| 
 | |
|     results = await sync_to_async(Blog.objects.get, thread_sensitive=True)(pk=123)
 | |
| 
 | |
| You may find it easier to move any ORM code into its own function and call that
 | |
| entire function using :func:`sync_to_async`. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async
 | |
| 
 | |
|     def _get_blog(pk):
 | |
|         return Blog.objects.select_related('author').get(pk=pk)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     get_blog = sync_to_async(_get_blog, thread_sensitive=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you accidentally try to call a part of Django that is still synchronous-only
 | |
| from an async view, you will trigger Django's
 | |
| :ref:`asynchronous safety protection <async-safety>` to protect your data from
 | |
| corruption.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Performance
 | |
| -----------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When running in a mode that does not match the view (e.g. an async view under
 | |
| WSGI, or a traditional sync view under ASGI), Django must emulate the other
 | |
| call style to allow your code to run. This context-switch causes a small
 | |
| performance penalty of around a millisecond.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is also true of middleware. Django will attempt to minimize the number of
 | |
| context-switches between sync and async. If you have an ASGI server, but all
 | |
| your middleware and views are synchronous, it will switch just once, before it
 | |
| enters the middleware stack.
 | |
| 
 | |
| However, if you put synchronous middleware between an ASGI server and an
 | |
| asynchronous view, it will have to switch into sync mode for the middleware and
 | |
| then back to async mode for the view. Django will also hold the sync thread
 | |
| open for middleware exception propagation. This may not be noticeable at first,
 | |
| but adding this penalty of one thread per request can remove any async
 | |
| performance advantage.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You should do your own performance testing to see what effect ASGI versus WSGI
 | |
| has on your code. In some cases, there may be a performance increase even for
 | |
| a purely synchronous codebase under ASGI because the request-handling code is
 | |
| still all running asynchronously. In general you will only want to enable ASGI
 | |
| mode if you have asynchronous code in your project.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _async-safety:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Async safety
 | |
| ============
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. envvar:: DJANGO_ALLOW_ASYNC_UNSAFE
 | |
| 
 | |
| Certain key parts of Django are not able to operate safely in an async
 | |
| environment, as they have global state that is not coroutine-aware. These parts
 | |
| of Django are classified as "async-unsafe", and are protected from execution in
 | |
| an async environment. The ORM is the main example, but there are other parts
 | |
| that are also protected in this way.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you try to run any of these parts from a thread where there is a *running
 | |
| event loop*, you will get a
 | |
| :exc:`~django.core.exceptions.SynchronousOnlyOperation` error. Note that you
 | |
| don't have to be inside an async function directly to have this error occur. If
 | |
| you have called a sync function directly from an async function,
 | |
| without using :func:`sync_to_async` or similar, then it can also occur. This is
 | |
| because your code is still running in a thread with an active event loop, even
 | |
| though it may not be declared as async code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you encounter this error, you should fix your code to not call the offending
 | |
| code from an async context. Instead, write your code that talks to async-unsafe
 | |
| functions in its own, sync function, and call that using
 | |
| :func:`asgiref.sync.sync_to_async` (or any other way of running sync code in
 | |
| its own thread).
 | |
| 
 | |
| The async context can be imposed upon you by the environment in which you are
 | |
| running your Django code. For example, Jupyter_ notebooks and IPython_
 | |
| interactive shells both transparently provide an active event loop so that it is
 | |
| easier to interact with asynchronous APIs.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're using an IPython shell, you can disable this event loop by running::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     %autoawait off
 | |
| 
 | |
| as a command at the IPython prompt. This will allow you to run synchronous code
 | |
| without generating :exc:`~django.core.exceptions.SynchronousOnlyOperation`
 | |
| errors; however, you also won't be able to ``await`` asynchronous APIs. To turn
 | |
| the event loop back on, run::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     %autoawait on
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're in an environment other than IPython (or you can't turn off
 | |
| ``autoawait`` in IPython for some reason), you are *certain* there is no chance
 | |
| of your code being run concurrently, and you *absolutely* need to run your sync
 | |
| code from an async context, then you can disable the warning by setting the
 | |
| :envvar:`DJANGO_ALLOW_ASYNC_UNSAFE` environment variable to any value.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If you enable this option and there is concurrent access to the
 | |
|     async-unsafe parts of Django, you may suffer data loss or corruption. Be
 | |
|     very careful and do not use this in production environments.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need to do this from within Python, do that with ``os.environ``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     import os
 | |
| 
 | |
|     os.environ["DJANGO_ALLOW_ASYNC_UNSAFE"] = "true"
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _Jupyter: https://jupyter.org/
 | |
| .. _IPython: https://ipython.org
 | |
| 
 | |
| Async adapter functions
 | |
| =======================
 | |
| 
 | |
| It is necessary to adapt the calling style when calling sync code from an async
 | |
| context, or vice-versa. For this there are two adapter functions, from the
 | |
| ``asgiref.sync`` module: :func:`async_to_sync` and :func:`sync_to_async`. They
 | |
| are used to transition between the calling styles while preserving
 | |
| compatibility.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These adapter functions are widely used in Django. The `asgiref`_ package
 | |
| itself is part of the Django project, and it is automatically installed as a
 | |
| dependency when you install Django with ``pip``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _asgiref: https://pypi.org/project/asgiref/
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``async_to_sync()``
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: async_to_sync(async_function, force_new_loop=False)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Takes an async function and returns a sync function that wraps it. Can be used
 | |
| as either a direct wrapper or a decorator::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from asgiref.sync import async_to_sync
 | |
| 
 | |
|     async def get_data(...):
 | |
|         ...
 | |
| 
 | |
|     sync_get_data = async_to_sync(get_data)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @async_to_sync
 | |
|     async def get_other_data(...):
 | |
|         ...
 | |
| 
 | |
| The async function is run in the event loop for the current thread, if one is
 | |
| present. If there is no current event loop, a new event loop is spun up
 | |
| specifically for the single async invocation and shut down again once it
 | |
| completes. In either situation, the async function will execute on a different
 | |
| thread to the calling code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Threadlocals and contextvars values are preserved across the boundary in both
 | |
| directions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| :func:`async_to_sync` is essentially a more powerful version of the
 | |
| :py:func:`asyncio.run` function in Python's standard library. As well
 | |
| as ensuring threadlocals work, it also enables the ``thread_sensitive`` mode of
 | |
| :func:`sync_to_async` when that wrapper is used below it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``sync_to_async()``
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: sync_to_async(sync_function, thread_sensitive=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Takes a sync function and returns an async function that wraps it. Can be used
 | |
| as either a direct wrapper or a decorator::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from asgiref.sync import sync_to_async
 | |
| 
 | |
|     async_function = sync_to_async(sync_function, thread_sensitive=False)
 | |
|     async_function = sync_to_async(sensitive_sync_function, thread_sensitive=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @sync_to_async
 | |
|     def sync_function(...):
 | |
|         ...
 | |
| 
 | |
| Threadlocals and contextvars values are preserved across the boundary in both
 | |
| directions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sync functions tend to be written assuming they all run in the main
 | |
| thread, so :func:`sync_to_async` has two threading modes:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``thread_sensitive=True`` (the default): the sync function will run in the
 | |
|   same thread as all other ``thread_sensitive`` functions. This will be the
 | |
|   main thread, if the main thread is synchronous and you are using the
 | |
|   :func:`async_to_sync` wrapper.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * ``thread_sensitive=False``: the sync function will run in a brand new thread
 | |
|   which is then closed once the invocation completes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``asgiref`` version 3.3.0 changed the default value of the
 | |
|     ``thread_sensitive`` parameter to ``True``. This is a safer default, and in
 | |
|     many cases interacting with Django the correct value, but be sure to
 | |
|     evaluate uses of ``sync_to_async()`` if updating ``asgiref`` from a prior
 | |
|     version.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Thread-sensitive mode is quite special, and does a lot of work to run all
 | |
| functions in the same thread. Note, though, that it *relies on usage of*
 | |
| :func:`async_to_sync` *above it in the stack* to correctly run things on the
 | |
| main thread. If you use ``asyncio.run()`` or similar, it will fall back to
 | |
| running thread-sensitive functions in a single, shared thread, but this will
 | |
| not be the main thread.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The reason this is needed in Django is that many libraries, specifically
 | |
| database adapters, require that they are accessed in the same thread that they
 | |
| were created in. Also a lot of existing Django code assumes it all runs in the
 | |
| same thread, e.g. middleware adding things to a request for later use in views.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Rather than introduce potential compatibility issues with this code, we instead
 | |
| opted to add this mode so that all existing Django sync code runs in the same
 | |
| thread and thus is fully compatible with async mode. Note that sync code will
 | |
| always be in a *different* thread to any async code that is calling it, so you
 | |
| should avoid passing raw database handles or other thread-sensitive references
 | |
| around.
 |