mirror of
https://github.com/django/django.git
synced 2024-12-29 12:36:08 +00:00
889 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
889 lines
36 KiB
Plaintext
==========
|
||
Migrations
|
||
==========
|
||
|
||
.. module:: django.db.migrations
|
||
:synopsis: Schema migration support for Django models
|
||
|
||
Migrations are Django's way of propagating changes you make to your models
|
||
(adding a field, deleting a model, etc.) into your database schema. They're
|
||
designed to be mostly automatic, but you'll need to know when to make
|
||
migrations, when to run them, and the common problems you might run into.
|
||
|
||
The Commands
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
There are several commands which you will use to interact with migrations
|
||
and Django's handling of database schema:
|
||
|
||
* :djadmin:`migrate`, which is responsible for applying and unapplying
|
||
migrations.
|
||
|
||
* :djadmin:`makemigrations`, which is responsible for creating new migrations
|
||
based on the changes you have made to your models.
|
||
|
||
* :djadmin:`sqlmigrate`, which displays the SQL statements for a migration.
|
||
|
||
* :djadmin:`showmigrations`, which lists a project's migrations and their
|
||
status.
|
||
|
||
You should think of migrations as a version control system for your database
|
||
schema. ``makemigrations`` is responsible for packaging up your model changes
|
||
into individual migration files - analogous to commits - and ``migrate`` is
|
||
responsible for applying those to your database.
|
||
|
||
The migration files for each app live in a "migrations" directory inside
|
||
of that app, and are designed to be committed to, and distributed as part
|
||
of, its codebase. You should be making them once on your development machine
|
||
and then running the same migrations on your colleagues' machines, your
|
||
staging machines, and eventually your production machines.
|
||
|
||
.. note::
|
||
It is possible to override the name of the package which contains the
|
||
migrations on a per-app basis by modifying the :setting:`MIGRATION_MODULES`
|
||
setting.
|
||
|
||
Migrations will run the same way on the same dataset and produce consistent
|
||
results, meaning that what you see in development and staging is, under the
|
||
same circumstances, exactly what will happen in production.
|
||
|
||
Django will make migrations for any change to your models or fields - even
|
||
options that don't affect the database - as the only way it can reconstruct
|
||
a field correctly is to have all the changes in the history, and you might
|
||
need those options in some data migrations later on (for example, if you've
|
||
set custom validators).
|
||
|
||
Backend Support
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
Migrations are supported on all backends that Django ships with, as well
|
||
as any third-party backends if they have programmed in support for schema
|
||
alteration (done via the :doc:`SchemaEditor </ref/schema-editor>` class).
|
||
|
||
However, some databases are more capable than others when it comes to
|
||
schema migrations; some of the caveats are covered below.
|
||
|
||
PostgreSQL
|
||
----------
|
||
|
||
PostgreSQL is the most capable of all the databases here in terms of schema
|
||
support.
|
||
|
||
MySQL
|
||
-----
|
||
|
||
MySQL lacks support for transactions around schema alteration operations,
|
||
meaning that if a migration fails to apply you will have to manually unpick
|
||
the changes in order to try again (it's impossible to roll back to an
|
||
earlier point).
|
||
|
||
In addition, MySQL will fully rewrite tables for almost every schema operation
|
||
and generally takes a time proportional to the number of rows in the table to
|
||
add or remove columns. On slower hardware this can be worse than a minute per
|
||
million rows - adding a few columns to a table with just a few million rows
|
||
could lock your site up for over ten minutes.
|
||
|
||
Finally, MySQL has relatively small limits on name lengths for columns, tables
|
||
and indexes, as well as a limit on the combined size of all columns an index
|
||
covers. This means that indexes that are possible on other backends will
|
||
fail to be created under MySQL.
|
||
|
||
SQLite
|
||
------
|
||
|
||
SQLite has very little built-in schema alteration support, and so Django
|
||
attempts to emulate it by:
|
||
|
||
* Creating a new table with the new schema
|
||
* Copying the data across
|
||
* Dropping the old table
|
||
* Renaming the new table to match the original name
|
||
|
||
This process generally works well, but it can be slow and occasionally
|
||
buggy. It is not recommended that you run and migrate SQLite in a
|
||
production environment unless you are very aware of the risks and
|
||
its limitations; the support Django ships with is designed to allow
|
||
developers to use SQLite on their local machines to develop less complex
|
||
Django projects without the need for a full database.
|
||
|
||
Workflow
|
||
========
|
||
|
||
Django can create migrations for you. Make changes to your models - say, add a
|
||
field and remove a model - and then run :djadmin:`makemigrations`:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py makemigrations
|
||
Migrations for 'books':
|
||
books/migrations/0003_auto.py:
|
||
- Alter field author on book
|
||
|
||
Your models will be scanned and compared to the versions currently
|
||
contained in your migration files, and then a new set of migrations
|
||
will be written out. Make sure to read the output to see what
|
||
``makemigrations`` thinks you have changed - it's not perfect, and for
|
||
complex changes it might not be detecting what you expect.
|
||
|
||
Once you have your new migration files, you should apply them to your
|
||
database to make sure they work as expected:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py migrate
|
||
Operations to perform:
|
||
Apply all migrations: books
|
||
Running migrations:
|
||
Rendering model states... DONE
|
||
Applying books.0003_auto... OK
|
||
|
||
Once the migration is applied, commit the migration and the models change
|
||
to your version control system as a single commit - that way, when other
|
||
developers (or your production servers) check out the code, they'll
|
||
get both the changes to your models and the accompanying migration at the
|
||
same time.
|
||
|
||
If you want to give the migration(s) a meaningful name instead of a generated
|
||
one, you can use the :option:`makemigrations --name` option:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py makemigrations --name changed_my_model your_app_label
|
||
|
||
Version control
|
||
---------------
|
||
|
||
Because migrations are stored in version control, you'll occasionally
|
||
come across situations where you and another developer have both committed
|
||
a migration to the same app at the same time, resulting in two migrations
|
||
with the same number.
|
||
|
||
Don't worry - the numbers are just there for developers' reference, Django
|
||
just cares that each migration has a different name. Migrations specify which
|
||
other migrations they depend on - including earlier migrations in the same
|
||
app - in the file, so it's possible to detect when there's two new migrations
|
||
for the same app that aren't ordered.
|
||
|
||
When this happens, Django will prompt you and give you some options. If it
|
||
thinks it's safe enough, it will offer to automatically linearize the two
|
||
migrations for you. If not, you'll have to go in and modify the migrations
|
||
yourself - don't worry, this isn't difficult, and is explained more in
|
||
:ref:`migration-files` below.
|
||
|
||
Transactions
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
On databases that support DDL transactions (SQLite and PostgreSQL), all
|
||
migration operations will run inside a single transaction by default. In
|
||
contrast, if a database doesn't support DDL transactions (e.g. MySQL, Oracle)
|
||
then all operations will run without a transaction.
|
||
|
||
You can prevent a migration from running in a transaction by setting the
|
||
``atomic`` attribute to ``False``. For example::
|
||
|
||
from django.db import migrations
|
||
|
||
|
||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||
atomic = False
|
||
|
||
It's also possible to execute parts of the migration inside a transaction using
|
||
:func:`~django.db.transaction.atomic()` or by passing ``atomic=True`` to
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython`. See
|
||
:ref:`non-atomic-migrations` for more details.
|
||
|
||
Dependencies
|
||
============
|
||
|
||
While migrations are per-app, the tables and relationships implied by
|
||
your models are too complex to be created for one app at a time. When you make
|
||
a migration that requires something else to run - for example, you add a
|
||
``ForeignKey`` in your ``books`` app to your ``authors`` app - the resulting
|
||
migration will contain a dependency on a migration in ``authors``.
|
||
|
||
This means that when you run the migrations, the ``authors`` migration runs
|
||
first and creates the table the ``ForeignKey`` references, and then the migration
|
||
that makes the ``ForeignKey`` column runs afterward and creates the constraint.
|
||
If this didn't happen, the migration would try to create the ``ForeignKey``
|
||
column without the table it's referencing existing and your database would
|
||
throw an error.
|
||
|
||
This dependency behavior affects most migration operations where you
|
||
restrict to a single app. Restricting to a single app (either in
|
||
``makemigrations`` or ``migrate``) is a best-efforts promise, and not
|
||
a guarantee; any other apps that need to be used to get dependencies correct
|
||
will be.
|
||
|
||
Apps without migrations must not have relations (``ForeignKey``,
|
||
``ManyToManyField``, etc.) to apps with migrations. Sometimes it may work, but
|
||
it's not supported.
|
||
|
||
.. _migration-files:
|
||
|
||
Migration files
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
Migrations are stored as an on-disk format, referred to here as
|
||
"migration files". These files are actually normal Python files with an
|
||
agreed-upon object layout, written in a declarative style.
|
||
|
||
A basic migration file looks like this::
|
||
|
||
from django.db import migrations, models
|
||
|
||
|
||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||
dependencies = [("migrations", "0001_initial")]
|
||
|
||
operations = [
|
||
migrations.DeleteModel("Tribble"),
|
||
migrations.AddField("Author", "rating", models.IntegerField(default=0)),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
What Django looks for when it loads a migration file (as a Python module) is
|
||
a subclass of ``django.db.migrations.Migration`` called ``Migration``. It then
|
||
inspects this object for four attributes, only two of which are used
|
||
most of the time:
|
||
|
||
* ``dependencies``, a list of migrations this one depends on.
|
||
* ``operations``, a list of ``Operation`` classes that define what this
|
||
migration does.
|
||
|
||
The operations are the key; they are a set of declarative instructions which
|
||
tell Django what schema changes need to be made. Django scans them and
|
||
builds an in-memory representation of all of the schema changes to all apps,
|
||
and uses this to generate the SQL which makes the schema changes.
|
||
|
||
That in-memory structure is also used to work out what the differences are
|
||
between your models and the current state of your migrations; Django runs
|
||
through all the changes, in order, on an in-memory set of models to come
|
||
up with the state of your models last time you ran ``makemigrations``. It
|
||
then uses these models to compare against the ones in your ``models.py`` files
|
||
to work out what you have changed.
|
||
|
||
You should rarely, if ever, need to edit migration files by hand, but
|
||
it's entirely possible to write them manually if you need to. Some of the
|
||
more complex operations are not autodetectable and are only available via
|
||
a hand-written migration, so don't be scared about editing them if you have to.
|
||
|
||
Custom fields
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
You can't modify the number of positional arguments in an already migrated
|
||
custom field without raising a ``TypeError``. The old migration will call the
|
||
modified ``__init__`` method with the old signature. So if you need a new
|
||
argument, please create a keyword argument and add something like
|
||
``assert 'argument_name' in kwargs`` in the constructor.
|
||
|
||
.. _using-managers-in-migrations:
|
||
|
||
Model managers
|
||
--------------
|
||
|
||
You can optionally serialize managers into migrations and have them available
|
||
in :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operations. This is done
|
||
by defining a ``use_in_migrations`` attribute on the manager class::
|
||
|
||
class MyManager(models.Manager):
|
||
use_in_migrations = True
|
||
|
||
|
||
class MyModel(models.Model):
|
||
objects = MyManager()
|
||
|
||
If you are using the :meth:`~django.db.models.from_queryset` function to
|
||
dynamically generate a manager class, you need to inherit from the generated
|
||
class to make it importable::
|
||
|
||
class MyManager(MyBaseManager.from_queryset(CustomQuerySet)):
|
||
use_in_migrations = True
|
||
|
||
|
||
class MyModel(models.Model):
|
||
objects = MyManager()
|
||
|
||
Please refer to the notes about :ref:`historical-models` in migrations to see
|
||
the implications that come along.
|
||
|
||
Initial migrations
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
.. attribute:: Migration.initial
|
||
|
||
The "initial migrations" for an app are the migrations that create the first
|
||
version of that app's tables. Usually an app will have one initial migration,
|
||
but in some cases of complex model interdependencies it may have two or more.
|
||
|
||
Initial migrations are marked with an ``initial = True`` class attribute on the
|
||
migration class. If an ``initial`` class attribute isn't found, a migration
|
||
will be considered "initial" if it is the first migration in the app (i.e. if
|
||
it has no dependencies on any other migration in the same app).
|
||
|
||
When the :option:`migrate --fake-initial` option is used, these initial
|
||
migrations are treated specially. For an initial migration that creates one or
|
||
more tables (``CreateModel`` operation), Django checks that all of those tables
|
||
already exist in the database and fake-applies the migration if so. Similarly,
|
||
for an initial migration that adds one or more fields (``AddField`` operation),
|
||
Django checks that all of the respective columns already exist in the database
|
||
and fake-applies the migration if so. Without ``--fake-initial``, initial
|
||
migrations are treated no differently from any other migration.
|
||
|
||
.. _migration-history-consistency:
|
||
|
||
History consistency
|
||
-------------------
|
||
|
||
As previously discussed, you may need to linearize migrations manually when two
|
||
development branches are joined. While editing migration dependencies, you can
|
||
inadvertently create an inconsistent history state where a migration has been
|
||
applied but some of its dependencies haven't. This is a strong indication that
|
||
the dependencies are incorrect, so Django will refuse to run migrations or make
|
||
new migrations until it's fixed. When using multiple databases, you can use the
|
||
:meth:`allow_migrate` method of :ref:`database routers
|
||
<topics-db-multi-db-routing>` to control which databases
|
||
:djadmin:`makemigrations` checks for consistent history.
|
||
|
||
Adding migrations to apps
|
||
=========================
|
||
|
||
New apps come preconfigured to accept migrations, and so you can add migrations
|
||
by running :djadmin:`makemigrations` once you've made some changes.
|
||
|
||
If your app already has models and database tables, and doesn't have migrations
|
||
yet (for example, you created it against a previous Django version), you'll
|
||
need to convert it to use migrations by running:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py makemigrations your_app_label
|
||
|
||
This will make a new initial migration for your app. Now, run ``python
|
||
manage.py migrate --fake-initial``, and Django will detect that you have an
|
||
initial migration *and* that the tables it wants to create already exist, and
|
||
will mark the migration as already applied. (Without the :option:`migrate
|
||
--fake-initial` flag, the command would error out because the tables it wants
|
||
to create already exist.)
|
||
|
||
Note that this only works given two things:
|
||
|
||
* You have not changed your models since you made their tables. For migrations
|
||
to work, you must make the initial migration *first* and then make changes,
|
||
as Django compares changes against migration files, not the database.
|
||
|
||
* You have not manually edited your database - Django won't be able to detect
|
||
that your database doesn't match your models, you'll just get errors when
|
||
migrations try to modify those tables.
|
||
|
||
.. _reversing-migrations:
|
||
|
||
Reversing migrations
|
||
====================
|
||
|
||
Migrations can be reversed with :djadmin:`migrate` by passing the number of the
|
||
previous migration. For example, to reverse migration ``books.0003``:
|
||
|
||
.. console::
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py migrate books 0002
|
||
Operations to perform:
|
||
Target specific migration: 0002_auto, from books
|
||
Running migrations:
|
||
Rendering model states... DONE
|
||
Unapplying books.0003_auto... OK
|
||
|
||
If you want to reverse all migrations applied for an app, use the name
|
||
``zero``:
|
||
|
||
.. console::
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py migrate books zero
|
||
Operations to perform:
|
||
Unapply all migrations: books
|
||
Running migrations:
|
||
Rendering model states... DONE
|
||
Unapplying books.0002_auto... OK
|
||
Unapplying books.0001_initial... OK
|
||
|
||
A migration is irreversible if it contains any irreversible operations.
|
||
Attempting to reverse such migrations will raise ``IrreversibleError``:
|
||
|
||
.. console::
|
||
|
||
$ python manage.py migrate books 0002
|
||
Operations to perform:
|
||
Target specific migration: 0002_auto, from books
|
||
Running migrations:
|
||
Rendering model states... DONE
|
||
Unapplying books.0003_auto...Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
django.db.migrations.exceptions.IrreversibleError: Operation <RunSQL sql='DROP TABLE demo_books'> in books.0003_auto is not reversible
|
||
|
||
.. _historical-models:
|
||
|
||
Historical models
|
||
=================
|
||
|
||
When you run migrations, Django is working from historical versions of your
|
||
models stored in the migration files. If you write Python code using the
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operation, or if you have
|
||
``allow_migrate`` methods on your database routers, you **need to use** these
|
||
historical model versions rather than importing them directly.
|
||
|
||
.. warning::
|
||
|
||
If you import models directly rather than using the historical models,
|
||
your migrations *may work initially* but will fail in the future when you
|
||
try to rerun old migrations (commonly, when you set up a new installation
|
||
and run through all the migrations to set up the database).
|
||
|
||
This means that historical model problems may not be immediately obvious.
|
||
If you run into this kind of failure, it's OK to edit the migration to use
|
||
the historical models rather than direct imports and commit those changes.
|
||
|
||
Because it's impossible to serialize arbitrary Python code, these historical
|
||
models will not have any custom methods that you have defined. They will,
|
||
however, have the same fields, relationships, managers (limited to those with
|
||
``use_in_migrations = True``) and ``Meta`` options (also versioned, so they may
|
||
be different from your current ones).
|
||
|
||
.. warning::
|
||
|
||
This means that you will NOT have custom ``save()`` methods called on objects
|
||
when you access them in migrations, and you will NOT have any custom
|
||
constructors or instance methods. Plan appropriately!
|
||
|
||
References to functions in field options such as ``upload_to`` and
|
||
``limit_choices_to`` and model manager declarations with managers having
|
||
``use_in_migrations = True`` are serialized in migrations, so the functions and
|
||
classes will need to be kept around for as long as there is a migration
|
||
referencing them. Any :doc:`custom model fields </howto/custom-model-fields>`
|
||
will also need to be kept, since these are imported directly by migrations.
|
||
|
||
In addition, the concrete base classes of the model are stored as pointers, so
|
||
you must always keep base classes around for as long as there is a migration
|
||
that contains a reference to them. On the plus side, methods and managers from
|
||
these base classes inherit normally, so if you absolutely need access to these
|
||
you can opt to move them into a superclass.
|
||
|
||
To remove old references, you can :ref:`squash migrations <migration-squashing>`
|
||
or, if there aren't many references, copy them into the migration files.
|
||
|
||
.. _migrations-removing-model-fields:
|
||
|
||
Considerations when removing model fields
|
||
=========================================
|
||
|
||
Similar to the "references to historical functions" considerations described in
|
||
the previous section, removing custom model fields from your project or
|
||
third-party app will cause a problem if they are referenced in old migrations.
|
||
|
||
To help with this situation, Django provides some model field attributes to
|
||
assist with model field deprecation using the :doc:`system checks framework
|
||
</topics/checks>`.
|
||
|
||
Add the ``system_check_deprecated_details`` attribute to your model field
|
||
similar to the following::
|
||
|
||
class IPAddressField(Field):
|
||
system_check_deprecated_details = {
|
||
"msg": (
|
||
"IPAddressField has been deprecated. Support for it (except "
|
||
"in historical migrations) will be removed in Django 1.9."
|
||
),
|
||
"hint": "Use GenericIPAddressField instead.", # optional
|
||
"id": "fields.W900", # pick a unique ID for your field.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
After a deprecation period of your choosing (two or three feature releases for
|
||
fields in Django itself), change the ``system_check_deprecated_details``
|
||
attribute to ``system_check_removed_details`` and update the dictionary similar
|
||
to::
|
||
|
||
class IPAddressField(Field):
|
||
system_check_removed_details = {
|
||
"msg": (
|
||
"IPAddressField has been removed except for support in "
|
||
"historical migrations."
|
||
),
|
||
"hint": "Use GenericIPAddressField instead.",
|
||
"id": "fields.E900", # pick a unique ID for your field.
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
You should keep the field's methods that are required for it to operate in
|
||
database migrations such as ``__init__()``, ``deconstruct()``, and
|
||
``get_internal_type()``. Keep this stub field for as long as any migrations
|
||
which reference the field exist. For example, after squashing migrations and
|
||
removing the old ones, you should be able to remove the field completely.
|
||
|
||
.. _data-migrations:
|
||
|
||
Data Migrations
|
||
===============
|
||
|
||
As well as changing the database schema, you can also use migrations to change
|
||
the data in the database itself, in conjunction with the schema if you want.
|
||
|
||
Migrations that alter data are usually called "data migrations"; they're best
|
||
written as separate migrations, sitting alongside your schema migrations.
|
||
|
||
Django can't automatically generate data migrations for you, as it does with
|
||
schema migrations, but it's not very hard to write them. Migration files in
|
||
Django are made up of :doc:`Operations </ref/migration-operations>`, and
|
||
the main operation you use for data migrations is
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython`.
|
||
|
||
To start, make an empty migration file you can work from (Django will put
|
||
the file in the right place, suggest a name, and add dependencies for you):
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
python manage.py makemigrations --empty yourappname
|
||
|
||
Then, open up the file; it should look something like this::
|
||
|
||
# Generated by Django A.B on YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM
|
||
from django.db import migrations
|
||
|
||
|
||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||
dependencies = [
|
||
("yourappname", "0001_initial"),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
operations = []
|
||
|
||
Now, all you need to do is create a new function and have
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` use it.
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` expects a callable as its argument
|
||
which takes two arguments - the first is an :doc:`app registry
|
||
</ref/applications/>` that has the historical versions of all your models
|
||
loaded into it to match where in your history the migration sits, and the
|
||
second is a :doc:`SchemaEditor </ref/schema-editor>`, which you can use to
|
||
manually effect database schema changes (but beware, doing this can confuse
|
||
the migration autodetector!)
|
||
|
||
Let's write a migration that populates our new ``name`` field with the combined
|
||
values of ``first_name`` and ``last_name`` (we've come to our senses and
|
||
realized that not everyone has first and last names). All we need to do is use
|
||
the historical model and iterate over the rows::
|
||
|
||
from django.db import migrations
|
||
|
||
|
||
def combine_names(apps, schema_editor):
|
||
# We can't import the Person model directly as it may be a newer
|
||
# version than this migration expects. We use the historical version.
|
||
Person = apps.get_model("yourappname", "Person")
|
||
for person in Person.objects.all():
|
||
person.name = f"{person.first_name} {person.last_name}"
|
||
person.save()
|
||
|
||
|
||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||
dependencies = [
|
||
("yourappname", "0001_initial"),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
operations = [
|
||
migrations.RunPython(combine_names),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
Once that's done, we can run ``python manage.py migrate`` as normal and the
|
||
data migration will run in place alongside other migrations.
|
||
|
||
You can pass a second callable to
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` to run whatever logic you
|
||
want executed when migrating backwards. If this callable is omitted, migrating
|
||
backwards will raise an exception.
|
||
|
||
Accessing models from other apps
|
||
--------------------------------
|
||
|
||
When writing a ``RunPython`` function that uses models from apps other than the
|
||
one in which the migration is located, the migration's ``dependencies``
|
||
attribute should include the latest migration of each app that is involved,
|
||
otherwise you may get an error similar to: ``LookupError: No installed app
|
||
with label 'myappname'`` when you try to retrieve the model in the ``RunPython``
|
||
function using ``apps.get_model()``.
|
||
|
||
In the following example, we have a migration in ``app1`` which needs to use
|
||
models in ``app2``. We aren't concerned with the details of ``move_m1`` other
|
||
than the fact it will need to access models from both apps. Therefore we've
|
||
added a dependency that specifies the last migration of ``app2``::
|
||
|
||
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
||
dependencies = [
|
||
("app1", "0001_initial"),
|
||
# added dependency to enable using models from app2 in move_m1
|
||
("app2", "0004_foobar"),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
operations = [
|
||
migrations.RunPython(move_m1),
|
||
]
|
||
|
||
More advanced migrations
|
||
------------------------
|
||
|
||
If you're interested in the more advanced migration operations, or want
|
||
to be able to write your own, see the :doc:`migration operations reference
|
||
</ref/migration-operations>` and the "how-to" on :doc:`writing migrations
|
||
</howto/writing-migrations>`.
|
||
|
||
.. _migration-squashing:
|
||
|
||
Squashing migrations
|
||
====================
|
||
|
||
You are encouraged to make migrations freely and not worry about how many you
|
||
have; the migration code is optimized to deal with hundreds at a time without
|
||
much slowdown. However, eventually you will want to move back from having
|
||
several hundred migrations to just a few, and that's where squashing comes in.
|
||
|
||
Squashing is the act of reducing an existing set of many migrations down to
|
||
one (or sometimes a few) migrations which still represent the same changes.
|
||
|
||
Django does this by taking all of your existing migrations, extracting their
|
||
``Operation``\s and putting them all in sequence, and then running an optimizer
|
||
over them to try and reduce the length of the list - for example, it knows
|
||
that :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.CreateModel` and
|
||
:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.DeleteModel` cancel each other out,
|
||
and it knows that :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.AddField` can be
|
||
rolled into :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.CreateModel`.
|
||
|
||
Once the operation sequence has been reduced as much as possible - the amount
|
||
possible depends on how closely intertwined your models are and if you have
|
||
any :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunSQL`
|
||
or :class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operations (which can't
|
||
be optimized through unless they are marked as ``elidable``) - Django will then
|
||
write it back out into a new set of migration files.
|
||
|
||
These files are marked to say they replace the previously-squashed migrations,
|
||
so they can coexist with the old migration files, and Django will intelligently
|
||
switch between them depending where you are in the history. If you're still
|
||
part-way through the set of migrations that you squashed, it will keep using
|
||
them until it hits the end and then switch to the squashed history, while new
|
||
installs will use the new squashed migration and skip all the old ones.
|
||
|
||
This enables you to squash and not mess up systems currently in production
|
||
that aren't fully up-to-date yet. The recommended process is to squash, keeping
|
||
the old files, commit and release, wait until all systems are upgraded with
|
||
the new release (or if you're a third-party project, ensure your users upgrade
|
||
releases in order without skipping any), and then remove the old files, commit
|
||
and do a second release.
|
||
|
||
The command that backs all this is :djadmin:`squashmigrations` - pass it the
|
||
app label and migration name you want to squash up to, and it'll get to work:
|
||
|
||
.. code-block:: shell
|
||
|
||
$ ./manage.py squashmigrations myapp 0004
|
||
Will squash the following migrations:
|
||
- 0001_initial
|
||
- 0002_some_change
|
||
- 0003_another_change
|
||
- 0004_undo_something
|
||
Do you wish to proceed? [yN] y
|
||
Optimizing...
|
||
Optimized from 12 operations to 7 operations.
|
||
Created new squashed migration /home/andrew/Programs/DjangoTest/test/migrations/0001_squashed_0004_undo_something.py
|
||
You should commit this migration but leave the old ones in place;
|
||
the new migration will be used for new installs. Once you are sure
|
||
all instances of the codebase have applied the migrations you squashed,
|
||
you can delete them.
|
||
|
||
Use the :option:`squashmigrations --squashed-name` option if you want to set
|
||
the name of the squashed migration rather than use an autogenerated one.
|
||
|
||
Note that model interdependencies in Django can get very complex, and squashing
|
||
may result in migrations that do not run; either mis-optimized (in which case
|
||
you can try again with ``--no-optimize``, though you should also report an issue),
|
||
or with a ``CircularDependencyError``, in which case you can manually resolve it.
|
||
|
||
To manually resolve a ``CircularDependencyError``, break out one of
|
||
the ForeignKeys in the circular dependency loop into a separate
|
||
migration, and move the dependency on the other app with it. If you're unsure,
|
||
see how :djadmin:`makemigrations` deals with the problem when asked to create
|
||
brand new migrations from your models. In a future release of Django,
|
||
:djadmin:`squashmigrations` will be updated to attempt to resolve these errors
|
||
itself.
|
||
|
||
Once you've squashed your migration, you should then commit it alongside the
|
||
migrations it replaces and distribute this change to all running instances
|
||
of your application, making sure that they run ``migrate`` to store the change
|
||
in their database.
|
||
|
||
You must then transition the squashed migration to a normal migration by:
|
||
|
||
- Deleting all the migration files it replaces.
|
||
- Updating all migrations that depend on the deleted migrations to depend on
|
||
the squashed migration instead.
|
||
- Removing the ``replaces`` attribute in the ``Migration`` class of the
|
||
squashed migration (this is how Django tells that it is a squashed migration).
|
||
|
||
.. note::
|
||
Once you've squashed a migration, you should not then re-squash that squashed
|
||
migration until you have fully transitioned it to a normal migration.
|
||
|
||
.. admonition:: Pruning references to deleted migrations
|
||
|
||
.. versionadded:: 4.1
|
||
|
||
If it is likely that you may reuse the name of a deleted migration in the
|
||
future, you should remove references to it from Django’s migrations table
|
||
with the :option:`migrate --prune` option.
|
||
|
||
.. _migration-serializing:
|
||
|
||
Serializing values
|
||
==================
|
||
|
||
Migrations are Python files containing the old definitions of your models
|
||
- thus, to write them, Django must take the current state of your models and
|
||
serialize them out into a file.
|
||
|
||
While Django can serialize most things, there are some things that we just
|
||
can't serialize out into a valid Python representation - there's no Python
|
||
standard for how a value can be turned back into code (``repr()`` only works
|
||
for basic values, and doesn't specify import paths).
|
||
|
||
Django can serialize the following:
|
||
|
||
- ``int``, ``float``, ``bool``, ``str``, ``bytes``, ``None``, ``NoneType``
|
||
- ``list``, ``set``, ``tuple``, ``dict``, ``range``.
|
||
- ``datetime.date``, ``datetime.time``, and ``datetime.datetime`` instances
|
||
(include those that are timezone-aware)
|
||
- ``decimal.Decimal`` instances
|
||
- ``enum.Enum`` and ``enum.Flag`` instances
|
||
- ``uuid.UUID`` instances
|
||
- :func:`functools.partial` and :class:`functools.partialmethod` instances
|
||
which have serializable ``func``, ``args``, and ``keywords`` values.
|
||
- Pure and concrete path objects from :mod:`pathlib`. Concrete paths are
|
||
converted to their pure path equivalent, e.g. :class:`pathlib.PosixPath` to
|
||
:class:`pathlib.PurePosixPath`.
|
||
- :class:`os.PathLike` instances, e.g. :class:`os.DirEntry`, which are
|
||
converted to ``str`` or ``bytes`` using :func:`os.fspath`.
|
||
- ``LazyObject`` instances which wrap a serializable value.
|
||
- Enumeration types (e.g. ``TextChoices`` or ``IntegerChoices``) instances.
|
||
- Any Django field
|
||
- Any function or method reference (e.g. ``datetime.datetime.today``) (must be in module's top-level scope)
|
||
- Unbound methods used from within the class body
|
||
- Any class reference (must be in module's top-level scope)
|
||
- Anything with a custom ``deconstruct()`` method (:ref:`see below <custom-deconstruct-method>`)
|
||
|
||
.. versionchanged:: 4.2
|
||
|
||
Serialization support for ``enum.Flag`` was added.
|
||
|
||
Django cannot serialize:
|
||
|
||
- Nested classes
|
||
- Arbitrary class instances (e.g. ``MyClass(4.3, 5.7)``)
|
||
- Lambdas
|
||
|
||
.. _custom-migration-serializers:
|
||
|
||
Custom serializers
|
||
------------------
|
||
|
||
You can serialize other types by writing a custom serializer. For example, if
|
||
Django didn't serialize :class:`~decimal.Decimal` by default, you could do
|
||
this::
|
||
|
||
from decimal import Decimal
|
||
|
||
from django.db.migrations.serializer import BaseSerializer
|
||
from django.db.migrations.writer import MigrationWriter
|
||
|
||
|
||
class DecimalSerializer(BaseSerializer):
|
||
def serialize(self):
|
||
return repr(self.value), {"from decimal import Decimal"}
|
||
|
||
|
||
MigrationWriter.register_serializer(Decimal, DecimalSerializer)
|
||
|
||
The first argument of ``MigrationWriter.register_serializer()`` is a type or
|
||
iterable of types that should use the serializer.
|
||
|
||
The ``serialize()`` method of your serializer must return a string of how the
|
||
value should appear in migrations and a set of any imports that are needed in
|
||
the migration.
|
||
|
||
.. _custom-deconstruct-method:
|
||
|
||
Adding a ``deconstruct()`` method
|
||
---------------------------------
|
||
|
||
You can let Django serialize your own custom class instances by giving the class
|
||
a ``deconstruct()`` method. It takes no arguments, and should return a tuple
|
||
of three things ``(path, args, kwargs)``:
|
||
|
||
* ``path`` should be the Python path to the class, with the class name included
|
||
as the last part (for example, ``myapp.custom_things.MyClass``). If your
|
||
class is not available at the top level of a module it is not serializable.
|
||
|
||
* ``args`` should be a list of positional arguments to pass to your class'
|
||
``__init__`` method. Everything in this list should itself be serializable.
|
||
|
||
* ``kwargs`` should be a dict of keyword arguments to pass to your class'
|
||
``__init__`` method. Every value should itself be serializable.
|
||
|
||
.. note::
|
||
|
||
This return value is different from the ``deconstruct()`` method
|
||
:ref:`for custom fields <custom-field-deconstruct-method>` which returns a
|
||
tuple of four items.
|
||
|
||
Django will write out the value as an instantiation of your class with the
|
||
given arguments, similar to the way it writes out references to Django fields.
|
||
|
||
To prevent a new migration from being created each time
|
||
:djadmin:`makemigrations` is run, you should also add a ``__eq__()`` method to
|
||
the decorated class. This function will be called by Django's migration
|
||
framework to detect changes between states.
|
||
|
||
As long as all of the arguments to your class' constructor are themselves
|
||
serializable, you can use the ``@deconstructible`` class decorator from
|
||
``django.utils.deconstruct`` to add the ``deconstruct()`` method::
|
||
|
||
from django.utils.deconstruct import deconstructible
|
||
|
||
|
||
@deconstructible
|
||
class MyCustomClass:
|
||
def __init__(self, foo=1):
|
||
self.foo = foo
|
||
...
|
||
|
||
def __eq__(self, other):
|
||
return self.foo == other.foo
|
||
|
||
|
||
The decorator adds logic to capture and preserve the arguments on their
|
||
way into your constructor, and then returns those arguments exactly when
|
||
deconstruct() is called.
|
||
|
||
Supporting multiple Django versions
|
||
===================================
|
||
|
||
If you are the maintainer of a third-party app with models, you may need to
|
||
ship migrations that support multiple Django versions. In this case, you should
|
||
always run :djadmin:`makemigrations` **with the lowest Django version you wish
|
||
to support**.
|
||
|
||
The migrations system will maintain backwards-compatibility according to the
|
||
same policy as the rest of Django, so migration files generated on Django X.Y
|
||
should run unchanged on Django X.Y+1. The migrations system does not promise
|
||
forwards-compatibility, however. New features may be added, and migration files
|
||
generated with newer versions of Django may not work on older versions.
|
||
|
||
.. seealso::
|
||
|
||
:doc:`The Migrations Operations Reference </ref/migration-operations>`
|
||
Covers the schema operations API, special operations, and writing your
|
||
own operations.
|
||
|
||
:doc:`The Writing Migrations "how-to" </howto/writing-migrations>`
|
||
Explains how to structure and write database migrations for different
|
||
scenarios you might encounter.
|