mirror of
				https://github.com/django/django.git
				synced 2025-10-28 16:16:12 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			1767 lines
		
	
	
		
			69 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			1767 lines
		
	
	
		
			69 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Plaintext
		
	
	
	
	
	
| ===========================
 | |
| Testing Django applications
 | |
| ===========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. module:: django.test
 | |
|    :synopsis: Testing tools for Django applications.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The :doc:`testing tutorial </intro/tutorial05>` and the
 | |
|     :doc:`advanced testing topics </topics/testing/advanced>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document is split into two primary sections. First, we explain how to write
 | |
| tests with Django. Then, we explain how to run them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Writing tests
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django's unit tests use a Python standard library module: :mod:`unittest`. This
 | |
| module defines tests in class-based approach.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: unittest2
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Python 2.7 introduced some major changes to the unittest library,
 | |
|     adding some extremely useful features. To ensure that every Django
 | |
|     project can benefit from these new features, Django ships with a
 | |
|     copy of unittest2_, a copy of the Python 2.7 unittest library,
 | |
|     backported for Python 2.5 compatibility.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     To access this library, Django provides the
 | |
|     ``django.utils.unittest`` module alias. If you are using Python
 | |
|     2.7, or you have installed unittest2 locally, Django will map the
 | |
|     alias to the installed version of the unittest library. Otherwise,
 | |
|     Django will use its own bundled version of unittest2.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     To use this alias, simply use::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         from django.utils import unittest
 | |
| 
 | |
|     wherever you would have historically used::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         import unittest
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If you want to continue to use the base unittest library, you can --
 | |
|     you just won't get any of the nice new unittest2 features.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _unittest2: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/unittest2
 | |
| 
 | |
| For a given Django application, the test runner looks for unit tests in two
 | |
| places:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The ``models.py`` file. The test runner looks for any subclass of
 | |
|   :class:`unittest.TestCase` in this module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * A file called ``tests.py`` in the application directory -- i.e., the
 | |
|   directory that holds ``models.py``. Again, the test runner looks for any
 | |
|   subclass of :class:`unittest.TestCase` in this module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here is an example :class:`unittest.TestCase` subclass::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.utils import unittest
 | |
|     from myapp.models import Animal
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class AnimalTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
 | |
|         def setUp(self):
 | |
|             self.lion = Animal(name="lion", sound="roar")
 | |
|             self.cat = Animal(name="cat", sound="meow")
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_animals_can_speak(self):
 | |
|             """Animals that can speak are correctly identified"""
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(self.lion.speak(), 'The lion says "roar"')
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(self.cat.speak(), 'The cat says "meow"')
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you :ref:`run your tests <running-tests>`, the default behavior of the test
 | |
| utility is to find all the test cases (that is, subclasses of
 | |
| :class:`unittest.TestCase`) in ``models.py`` and ``tests.py``, automatically
 | |
| build a test suite out of those test cases, and run that suite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is a second way to define the test suite for a module: if you define a
 | |
| function called ``suite()`` in either ``models.py`` or ``tests.py``, the
 | |
| Django test runner will use that function to construct the test suite for that
 | |
| module. This follows the `suggested organization`_ for unit tests. See the
 | |
| Python documentation for more details on how to construct a complex test
 | |
| suite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For more details about :mod:`unittest`, see the Python documentation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _suggested organization: http://docs.python.org/library/unittest.html#organizing-tests
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. warning::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If your tests rely on database access such as creating or querying models,
 | |
|     be sure to create your test classes as subclasses of
 | |
|     :class:`django.test.TestCase` rather than :class:`unittest.TestCase`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     In the example above, we instantiate some models but do not save them to
 | |
|     the database. Using :class:`unittest.TestCase` avoids the cost of running
 | |
|     each test in a transaction and flushing the database, but for most
 | |
|     applications the scope of tests you will be able to write this way will
 | |
|     be fairly limited, so it's easiest to use :class:`django.test.TestCase`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _running-tests:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Running tests
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've written tests, run them using the :djadmin:`test` command of
 | |
| your project's ``manage.py`` utility::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default, this will run every test in every application in
 | |
| :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`. If you only want to run tests for a particular
 | |
| application, add the application name to the command line. For example, if your
 | |
| :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS` contains ``'myproject.polls'`` and
 | |
| ``'myproject.animals'``, you can run the ``myproject.animals`` unit tests alone
 | |
| with this command::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test animals
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that we used ``animals``, not ``myproject.animals``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can be even *more* specific by naming an individual test case. To
 | |
| run a single test case in an application (for example, the
 | |
| ``AnimalTestCase`` described in the "Writing unit tests" section), add
 | |
| the name of the test case to the label on the command line::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test animals.AnimalTestCase
 | |
| 
 | |
| And it gets even more granular than that! To run a *single* test
 | |
| method inside a test case, add the name of the test method to the
 | |
| label::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test animals.AnimalTestCase.test_animals_can_speak
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use the same rules if you're using doctests. Django will use the
 | |
| test label as a path to the test method or class that you want to run.
 | |
| If your ``models.py`` or ``tests.py`` has a function with a doctest, or
 | |
| class with a class-level doctest, you can invoke that test by appending the
 | |
| name of the test method or class to the label::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test animals.classify
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to run the doctest for a specific method in a class, add the
 | |
| name of the method to the label::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     $ ./manage.py test animals.Classifier.run
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're using a ``__test__`` dictionary to specify doctests for a
 | |
| module, Django will use the label as a key in the ``__test__`` dictionary
 | |
| for defined in ``models.py`` and ``tests.py``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you press ``Ctrl-C`` while the tests are running, the test runner will
 | |
| wait for the currently running test to complete and then exit gracefully.
 | |
| During a graceful exit the test runner will output details of any test
 | |
| failures, report on how many tests were run and how many errors and failures
 | |
| were encountered, and destroy any test databases as usual. Thus pressing
 | |
| ``Ctrl-C`` can be very useful if you forget to pass the :djadminopt:`--failfast`
 | |
| option, notice that some tests are unexpectedly failing, and want to get details
 | |
| on the failures without waiting for the full test run to complete.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you do not want to wait for the currently running test to finish, you
 | |
| can press ``Ctrl-C`` a second time and the test run will halt immediately,
 | |
| but not gracefully. No details of the tests run before the interruption will
 | |
| be reported, and any test databases created by the run will not be destroyed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: Test with warnings enabled
 | |
| 
 | |
|     It's a good idea to run your tests with Python warnings enabled:
 | |
|     ``python -Wall manage.py test``. The ``-Wall`` flag tells Python to
 | |
|     display deprecation warnings. Django, like many other Python libraries,
 | |
|     uses these warnings to flag when features are going away. It also might
 | |
|     flag areas in your code that aren't strictly wrong but could benefit
 | |
|     from a better implementation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _the-test-database:
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test database
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tests that require a database (namely, model tests) will not use your "real"
 | |
| (production) database. Separate, blank databases are created for the tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regardless of whether the tests pass or fail, the test databases are destroyed
 | |
| when all the tests have been executed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default the test databases get their names by prepending ``test_``
 | |
| to the value of the :setting:`NAME` settings for the databases
 | |
| defined in :setting:`DATABASES`. When using the SQLite database engine
 | |
| the tests will by default use an in-memory database (i.e., the
 | |
| database will be created in memory, bypassing the filesystem
 | |
| entirely!). If you want to use a different database name, specify
 | |
| :setting:`TEST_NAME` in the dictionary for any given database in
 | |
| :setting:`DATABASES`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Aside from using a separate database, the test runner will otherwise
 | |
| use all of the same database settings you have in your settings file:
 | |
| :setting:`ENGINE <DATABASE-ENGINE>`, :setting:`USER`, :setting:`HOST`, etc. The
 | |
| test database is created by the user specified by :setting:`USER`, so you'll
 | |
| need to make sure that the given user account has sufficient privileges to
 | |
| create a new database on the system.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For fine-grained control over the character encoding of your test
 | |
| database, use the :setting:`TEST_CHARSET` option. If you're using
 | |
| MySQL, you can also use the :setting:`TEST_COLLATION` option to
 | |
| control the particular collation used by the test database. See the
 | |
| :doc:`settings documentation </ref/settings>` for details of these
 | |
| advanced settings.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: Finding data from your production database when running tests?
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If your code attempts to access the database when its modules are compiled,
 | |
|     this will occur *before* the test database is set up, with potentially
 | |
|     unexpected results. For example, if you have a database query in
 | |
|     module-level code and a real database exists, production data could pollute
 | |
|     your tests. *It is a bad idea to have such import-time database queries in
 | |
|     your code* anyway - rewrite your code so that it doesn't do this.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The :ref:`advanced multi-db testing topics <topics-testing-advanced-multidb>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Order in which tests are executed
 | |
| ---------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to guarantee that all ``TestCase`` code starts with a clean database,
 | |
| the Django test runner reorders tests in the following way:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * First, all unittests (including :class:`unittest.TestCase`,
 | |
|   :class:`~django.test.SimpleTestCase`, :class:`~django.test.TestCase` and
 | |
|   :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase`) are run with no particular ordering
 | |
|   guaranteed nor enforced among them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Then any other tests (e.g. doctests) that may alter the database without
 | |
|   restoring it to its original state are run.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|     Before Django 1.5, the only guarantee was that
 | |
|     :class:`~django.test.TestCase` tests were always ran first, before any other
 | |
|     tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The new ordering of tests may reveal unexpected dependencies on test case
 | |
|     ordering. This is the case with doctests that relied on state left in the
 | |
|     database by a given :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase` test, they
 | |
|     must be updated to be able to run independently.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other test conditions
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regardless of the value of the :setting:`DEBUG` setting in your configuration
 | |
| file, all Django tests run with :setting:`DEBUG`\=False. This is to ensure that
 | |
| the observed output of your code matches what will be seen in a production
 | |
| setting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Caches are not cleared after each test, and running "manage.py test fooapp" can
 | |
| insert data from the tests into the cache of a live system if you run your
 | |
| tests in production because, unlike databases, a separate "test cache" is not
 | |
| used. This behavior `may change`_ in the future.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _may change: https://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11505
 | |
| 
 | |
| Understanding the test output
 | |
| -----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you run your tests, you'll see a number of messages as the test runner
 | |
| prepares itself. You can control the level of detail of these messages with the
 | |
| ``verbosity`` option on the command line::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Creating test database...
 | |
|     Creating table myapp_animal
 | |
|     Creating table myapp_mineral
 | |
|     Loading 'initial_data' fixtures...
 | |
|     No fixtures found.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This tells you that the test runner is creating a test database, as described
 | |
| in the previous section.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once the test database has been created, Django will run your tests.
 | |
| If everything goes well, you'll see something like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | |
|     Ran 22 tests in 0.221s
 | |
| 
 | |
|     OK
 | |
| 
 | |
| If there are test failures, however, you'll see full details about which tests
 | |
| failed::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ======================================================================
 | |
|     FAIL: Doctest: ellington.core.throttle.models
 | |
|     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | |
|     Traceback (most recent call last):
 | |
|       File "/dev/django/test/doctest.py", line 2153, in runTest
 | |
|         raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
 | |
|     AssertionError: Failed doctest test for myapp.models
 | |
|       File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 0, in models
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | |
|     File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 14, in myapp.models
 | |
|     Failed example:
 | |
|         throttle.check("actor A", "action one", limit=2, hours=1)
 | |
|     Expected:
 | |
|         True
 | |
|     Got:
 | |
|         False
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 | |
|     Ran 2 tests in 0.048s
 | |
| 
 | |
|     FAILED (failures=1)
 | |
| 
 | |
| A full explanation of this error output is beyond the scope of this document,
 | |
| but it's pretty intuitive. You can consult the documentation of Python's
 | |
| :mod:`unittest` library for details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the return code for the test-runner script is 1 for any number of
 | |
| failed and erroneous tests. If all the tests pass, the return code is 0. This
 | |
| feature is useful if you're using the test-runner script in a shell script and
 | |
| need to test for success or failure at that level.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Speeding up the tests
 | |
| ---------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| In recent versions of Django, the default password hasher is rather slow by
 | |
| design. If during your tests you are authenticating many users, you may want
 | |
| to use a custom settings file and set the :setting:`PASSWORD_HASHERS` setting
 | |
| to a faster hashing algorithm::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     PASSWORD_HASHERS = (
 | |
|         'django.contrib.auth.hashers.MD5PasswordHasher',
 | |
|     )
 | |
| 
 | |
| Don't forget to also include in :setting:`PASSWORD_HASHERS` any hashing
 | |
| algorithm used in fixtures, if any.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Testing tools
 | |
| =============
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django provides a small set of tools that come in handy when writing tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _test-client:
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test client
 | |
| ---------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. module:: django.test.client
 | |
|    :synopsis: Django's test client.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test client is a Python class that acts as a dummy Web browser, allowing
 | |
| you to test your views and interact with your Django-powered application
 | |
| programmatically.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Some of the things you can do with the test client are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Simulate GET and POST requests on a URL and observe the response --
 | |
|   everything from low-level HTTP (result headers and status codes) to
 | |
|   page content.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Test that the correct view is executed for a given URL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Test that a given request is rendered by a given Django template, with
 | |
|   a template context that contains certain values.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note that the test client is not intended to be a replacement for Selenium_ or
 | |
| other "in-browser" frameworks. Django's test client has a different focus. In
 | |
| short:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use Django's test client to establish that the correct view is being
 | |
|   called and that the view is collecting the correct context data.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Use in-browser frameworks like Selenium_ to test *rendered* HTML and the
 | |
|   *behavior* of Web pages, namely JavaScript functionality. Django also
 | |
|   provides special support for those frameworks; see the section on
 | |
|   :class:`~django.test.LiveServerTestCase` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A comprehensive test suite should use a combination of both test types.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Overview and a quick example
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| To use the test client, instantiate ``django.test.client.Client`` and retrieve
 | |
| Web pages::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     >>> from django.test.client import Client
 | |
|     >>> c = Client()
 | |
|     >>> response = c.post('/login/', {'username': 'john', 'password': 'smith'})
 | |
|     >>> response.status_code
 | |
|     200
 | |
|     >>> response = c.get('/customer/details/')
 | |
|     >>> response.content
 | |
|     '<!DOCTYPE html...'
 | |
| 
 | |
| As this example suggests, you can instantiate ``Client`` from within a session
 | |
| of the Python interactive interpreter.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note a few important things about how the test client works:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The test client does *not* require the Web server to be running. In fact,
 | |
|   it will run just fine with no Web server running at all! That's because
 | |
|   it avoids the overhead of HTTP and deals directly with the Django
 | |
|   framework. This helps make the unit tests run quickly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * When retrieving pages, remember to specify the *path* of the URL, not the
 | |
|   whole domain. For example, this is correct::
 | |
| 
 | |
|       >>> c.get('/login/')
 | |
| 
 | |
|   This is incorrect::
 | |
| 
 | |
|       >>> c.get('http://www.example.com/login/')
 | |
| 
 | |
|   The test client is not capable of retrieving Web pages that are not
 | |
|   powered by your Django project. If you need to retrieve other Web pages,
 | |
|   use a Python standard library module such as :mod:`urllib` or
 | |
|   :mod:`urllib2`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * To resolve URLs, the test client uses whatever URLconf is pointed-to by
 | |
|   your :setting:`ROOT_URLCONF` setting.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Although the above example would work in the Python interactive
 | |
|   interpreter, some of the test client's functionality, notably the
 | |
|   template-related functionality, is only available *while tests are
 | |
|   running*.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   The reason for this is that Django's test runner performs a bit of black
 | |
|   magic in order to determine which template was loaded by a given view.
 | |
|   This black magic (essentially a patching of Django's template system in
 | |
|   memory) only happens during test running.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * By default, the test client will disable any CSRF checks
 | |
|   performed by your site.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   If, for some reason, you *want* the test client to perform CSRF
 | |
|   checks, you can create an instance of the test client that
 | |
|   enforces CSRF checks. To do this, pass in the
 | |
|   ``enforce_csrf_checks`` argument when you construct your
 | |
|   client::
 | |
| 
 | |
|       >>> from django.test import Client
 | |
|       >>> csrf_client = Client(enforce_csrf_checks=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Making requests
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| Use the ``django.test.client.Client`` class to make requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: Client(enforce_csrf_checks=False, **defaults)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     It requires no arguments at time of construction. However, you can use
 | |
|     keywords arguments to specify some default headers. For example, this will
 | |
|     send a ``User-Agent`` HTTP header in each request::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> c = Client(HTTP_USER_AGENT='Mozilla/5.0')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The values from the ``extra`` keywords arguments passed to
 | |
|     :meth:`~django.test.client.Client.get()`,
 | |
|     :meth:`~django.test.client.Client.post()`, etc. have precedence over
 | |
|     the defaults passed to the class constructor.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The ``enforce_csrf_checks`` argument can be used to test CSRF
 | |
|     protection (see above).
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Once you have a ``Client`` instance, you can call any of the following
 | |
|     methods:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.get(path, data={}, follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes a GET request on the provided ``path`` and returns a ``Response``
 | |
|         object, which is documented below.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The key-value pairs in the ``data`` dictionary are used to create a GET
 | |
|         data payload. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> c = Client()
 | |
|             >>> c.get('/customers/details/', {'name': 'fred', 'age': 7})
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ...will result in the evaluation of a GET request equivalent to::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             /customers/details/?name=fred&age=7
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``extra`` keyword arguments parameter can be used to specify
 | |
|         headers to be sent in the request. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> c = Client()
 | |
|             >>> c.get('/customers/details/', {'name': 'fred', 'age': 7},
 | |
|             ...       HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH='XMLHttpRequest')
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ...will send the HTTP header ``HTTP_X_REQUESTED_WITH`` to the
 | |
|         details view, which is a good way to test code paths that use the
 | |
|         :meth:`django.http.HttpRequest.is_ajax()` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. admonition:: CGI specification
 | |
| 
 | |
|             The headers sent via ``**extra`` should follow CGI_ specification.
 | |
|             For example, emulating a different "Host" header as sent in the
 | |
|             HTTP request from the browser to the server should be passed
 | |
|             as ``HTTP_HOST``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|             .. _CGI: http://www.w3.org/CGI/
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you already have the GET arguments in URL-encoded form, you can
 | |
|         use that encoding instead of using the data argument. For example,
 | |
|         the previous GET request could also be posed as::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> c = Client()
 | |
|         >>> c.get('/customers/details/?name=fred&age=7')
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you provide a URL with both an encoded GET data and a data argument,
 | |
|         the data argument will take precedence.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you set ``follow`` to ``True`` the client will follow any redirects
 | |
|         and a ``redirect_chain`` attribute will be set in the response object
 | |
|         containing tuples of the intermediate urls and status codes.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you had a URL ``/redirect_me/`` that redirected to ``/next/``, that
 | |
|         redirected to ``/final/``, this is what you'd see::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> response = c.get('/redirect_me/', follow=True)
 | |
|             >>> response.redirect_chain
 | |
|             [(u'http://testserver/next/', 302), (u'http://testserver/final/', 302)]
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.post(path, data={}, content_type=MULTIPART_CONTENT, follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes a POST request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object, which is documented below.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The key-value pairs in the ``data`` dictionary are used to submit POST
 | |
|         data. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> c = Client()
 | |
|             >>> c.post('/login/', {'name': 'fred', 'passwd': 'secret'})
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ...will result in the evaluation of a POST request to this URL::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             /login/
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ...with this POST data::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             name=fred&passwd=secret
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you provide ``content_type`` (e.g. :mimetype:`text/xml` for an XML
 | |
|         payload), the contents of ``data`` will be sent as-is in the POST
 | |
|         request, using ``content_type`` in the HTTP ``Content-Type`` header.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you don't provide a value for ``content_type``, the values in
 | |
|         ``data`` will be transmitted with a content type of
 | |
|         :mimetype:`multipart/form-data`. In this case, the key-value pairs in
 | |
|         ``data`` will be encoded as a multipart message and used to create the
 | |
|         POST data payload.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         To submit multiple values for a given key -- for example, to specify
 | |
|         the selections for a ``<select multiple>`` -- provide the values as a
 | |
|         list or tuple for the required key. For example, this value of ``data``
 | |
|         would submit three selected values for the field named ``choices``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             {'choices': ('a', 'b', 'd')}
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Submitting files is a special case. To POST a file, you need only
 | |
|         provide the file field name as a key, and a file handle to the file you
 | |
|         wish to upload as a value. For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> c = Client()
 | |
|             >>> with open('wishlist.doc') as fp:
 | |
|             ...     c.post('/customers/wishes/', {'name': 'fred', 'attachment': fp})
 | |
| 
 | |
|         (The name ``attachment`` here is not relevant; use whatever name your
 | |
|         file-processing code expects.)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Note that if you wish to use the same file handle for multiple
 | |
|         ``post()`` calls then you will need to manually reset the file
 | |
|         pointer between posts. The easiest way to do this is to
 | |
|         manually close the file after it has been provided to
 | |
|         ``post()``, as demonstrated above.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         You should also ensure that the file is opened in a way that
 | |
|         allows the data to be read. If your file contains binary data
 | |
|         such as an image, this means you will need to open the file in
 | |
|         ``rb`` (read binary) mode.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``extra`` argument acts the same as for :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If the URL you request with a POST contains encoded parameters, these
 | |
|         parameters will be made available in the request.GET data. For example,
 | |
|         if you were to make the request::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         >>> c.post('/login/?visitor=true', {'name': 'fred', 'passwd': 'secret'})
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ... the view handling this request could interrogate request.POST
 | |
|         to retrieve the username and password, and could interrogate request.GET
 | |
|         to determine if the user was a visitor.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you set ``follow`` to ``True`` the client will follow any redirects
 | |
|         and a ``redirect_chain`` attribute will be set in the response object
 | |
|         containing tuples of the intermediate urls and status codes.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.head(path, data={}, follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes a HEAD request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object. This method works just like :meth:`Client.get`,
 | |
|         including the ``follow`` and ``extra`` arguments, except it does not
 | |
|         return a message body.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.options(path, data='', content_type='application/octet-stream', follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes an OPTIONS request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object. Useful for testing RESTful interfaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         When ``data`` is provided, it is used as the request body, and
 | |
|         a ``Content-Type`` header is set to ``content_type``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.options` used to process ``data`` like
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``follow`` and ``extra`` arguments act the same as for
 | |
|         :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.put(path, data='', content_type='application/octet-stream', follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes a PUT request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object. Useful for testing RESTful interfaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         When ``data`` is provided, it is used as the request body, and
 | |
|         a ``Content-Type`` header is set to ``content_type``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.put` used to process ``data`` like
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.post`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``follow`` and ``extra`` arguments act the same as for
 | |
|         :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.patch(path, data='', content_type='application/octet-stream', follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes a PATCH request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object. Useful for testing RESTful interfaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``follow`` and ``extra`` arguments act the same as for
 | |
|         :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.delete(path, data='', content_type='application/octet-stream', follow=False, **extra)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Makes an DELETE request on the provided ``path`` and returns a
 | |
|         ``Response`` object. Useful for testing RESTful interfaces.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         When ``data`` is provided, it is used as the request body, and
 | |
|         a ``Content-Type`` header is set to ``content_type``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.delete` used to process ``data`` like
 | |
|             :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The ``follow`` and ``extra`` arguments act the same as for
 | |
|         :meth:`Client.get`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.login(**credentials)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If your site uses Django's :doc:`authentication system</topics/auth/index>`
 | |
|         and you deal with logging in users, you can use the test client's
 | |
|         ``login()`` method to simulate the effect of a user logging into the
 | |
|         site.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         After you call this method, the test client will have all the cookies
 | |
|         and session data required to pass any login-based tests that may form
 | |
|         part of a view.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The format of the ``credentials`` argument depends on which
 | |
|         :ref:`authentication backend <authentication-backends>` you're using
 | |
|         (which is configured by your :setting:`AUTHENTICATION_BACKENDS`
 | |
|         setting). If you're using the standard authentication backend provided
 | |
|         by Django (``ModelBackend``), ``credentials`` should be the user's
 | |
|         username and password, provided as keyword arguments::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> c = Client()
 | |
|             >>> c.login(username='fred', password='secret')
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Now you can access a view that's only available to logged-in users.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If you're using a different authentication backend, this method may
 | |
|         require different credentials. It requires whichever credentials are
 | |
|         required by your backend's ``authenticate()`` method.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         ``login()`` returns ``True`` if it the credentials were accepted and
 | |
|         login was successful.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Finally, you'll need to remember to create user accounts before you can
 | |
|         use this method. As we explained above, the test runner is executed
 | |
|         using a test database, which contains no users by default. As a result,
 | |
|         user accounts that are valid on your production site will not work
 | |
|         under test conditions. You'll need to create users as part of the test
 | |
|         suite -- either manually (using the Django model API) or with a test
 | |
|         fixture. Remember that if you want your test user to have a password,
 | |
|         you can't set the user's password by setting the password attribute
 | |
|         directly -- you must use the
 | |
|         :meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.User.set_password()` function to
 | |
|         store a correctly hashed password. Alternatively, you can use the
 | |
|         :meth:`~django.contrib.auth.models.UserManager.create_user` helper
 | |
|         method to create a new user with a correctly hashed password.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. method:: Client.logout()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If your site uses Django's :doc:`authentication system</topics/auth/index>`,
 | |
|         the ``logout()`` method can be used to simulate the effect of a user
 | |
|         logging out of your site.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         After you call this method, the test client will have all the cookies
 | |
|         and session data cleared to defaults. Subsequent requests will appear
 | |
|         to come from an AnonymousUser.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Testing responses
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``get()`` and ``post()`` methods both return a ``Response`` object. This
 | |
| ``Response`` object is *not* the same as the ``HttpResponse`` object returned
 | |
| Django views; the test response object has some additional data useful for
 | |
| test code to verify.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Specifically, a ``Response`` object has the following attributes:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: Response()
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: client
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The test client that was used to make the request that resulted in the
 | |
|         response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: content
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The body of the response, as a string. This is the final page content as
 | |
|         rendered by the view, or any error message.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: context
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The template ``Context`` instance that was used to render the template that
 | |
|         produced the response content.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         If the rendered page used multiple templates, then ``context`` will be a
 | |
|         list of ``Context`` objects, in the order in which they were rendered.
 | |
| 
 | |
|         Regardless of the number of templates used during rendering, you can
 | |
|         retrieve context values using the ``[]`` operator. For example, the
 | |
|         context variable ``name`` could be retrieved using::
 | |
| 
 | |
|             >>> response = client.get('/foo/')
 | |
|             >>> response.context['name']
 | |
|             'Arthur'
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: request
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The request data that stimulated the response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: status_code
 | |
| 
 | |
|         The HTTP status of the response, as an integer. See
 | |
|         :rfc:`2616#section-10` for a full list of HTTP status codes.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. attribute:: templates
 | |
| 
 | |
|         A list of ``Template`` instances used to render the final content, in
 | |
|         the order they were rendered. For each template in the list, use
 | |
|         ``template.name`` to get the template's file name, if the template was
 | |
|         loaded from a file. (The name is a string such as
 | |
|         ``'admin/index.html'``.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can also use dictionary syntax on the response object to query the value
 | |
| of any settings in the HTTP headers. For example, you could determine the
 | |
| content type of a response using ``response['Content-Type']``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Exceptions
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you point the test client at a view that raises an exception, that exception
 | |
| will be visible in the test case. You can then use a standard ``try ... except``
 | |
| block or :meth:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaises` to test for exceptions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The only exceptions that are not visible to the test client are ``Http404``,
 | |
| ``PermissionDenied`` and ``SystemExit``. Django catches these exceptions
 | |
| internally and converts them into the appropriate HTTP response codes. In these
 | |
| cases, you can check ``response.status_code`` in your test.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Persistent state
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test client is stateful. If a response returns a cookie, then that cookie
 | |
| will be stored in the test client and sent with all subsequent ``get()`` and
 | |
| ``post()`` requests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Expiration policies for these cookies are not followed. If you want a cookie
 | |
| to expire, either delete it manually or create a new ``Client`` instance (which
 | |
| will effectively delete all cookies).
 | |
| 
 | |
| A test client has two attributes that store persistent state information. You
 | |
| can access these properties as part of a test condition.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: Client.cookies
 | |
| 
 | |
|     A Python :class:`~Cookie.SimpleCookie` object, containing the current values
 | |
|     of all the client cookies. See the documentation of the :mod:`Cookie` module
 | |
|     for more.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: Client.session
 | |
| 
 | |
|     A dictionary-like object containing session information. See the
 | |
|     :doc:`session documentation</topics/http/sessions>` for full details.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     To modify the session and then save it, it must be stored in a variable
 | |
|     first (because a new ``SessionStore`` is created every time this property
 | |
|     is accessed)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_something(self):
 | |
|             session = self.client.session
 | |
|             session['somekey'] = 'test'
 | |
|             session.save()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Example
 | |
| ~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following is a simple unit test using the test client::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.utils import unittest
 | |
|     from django.test.client import Client
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class SimpleTest(unittest.TestCase):
 | |
|         def setUp(self):
 | |
|             # Every test needs a client.
 | |
|             self.client = Client()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_details(self):
 | |
|             # Issue a GET request.
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/customer/details/')
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Check that the response is 200 OK.
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Check that the rendered context contains 5 customers.
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(len(response.context['customers']), 5)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. seealso::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :class:`django.test.client.RequestFactory`
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _django-testcase-subclasses:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Provided test case classes
 | |
| --------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.test
 | |
| 
 | |
| Normal Python unit test classes extend a base class of
 | |
| :class:`unittest.TestCase`. Django provides a few extensions of this base class:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _testcase_hierarchy_diagram:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. figure:: _images/django_unittest_classes_hierarchy.*
 | |
|    :alt: Hierarchy of Django unit testing classes (TestCase subclasses)
 | |
|    :width: 508
 | |
|    :height: 391
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Hierarchy of Django unit testing classes
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regardless of the version of Python you're using, if you've installed
 | |
| ``unittest2``, ``django.utils.unittest`` will point to that library.
 | |
| 
 | |
| SimpleTestCase
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: SimpleTestCase()
 | |
| 
 | |
| A very thin subclass of :class:`unittest.TestCase`, it extends it with some
 | |
| basic functionality like:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Saving and restoring the Python warning machinery state.
 | |
| * Checking that a callable :meth:`raises a certain exception <SimpleTestCase.assertRaisesMessage>`.
 | |
| * :meth:`Testing form field rendering <SimpleTestCase.assertFieldOutput>`.
 | |
| * Testing server :ref:`HTML responses for the presence/lack of a given fragment <assertions>`.
 | |
| * The ability to run tests with :ref:`modified settings <overriding-settings>`
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need any of the other more complex and heavyweight Django-specific
 | |
| features like:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Using the :attr:`~TestCase.client` :class:`~django.test.client.Client`.
 | |
| * Testing or using the ORM.
 | |
| * Database :attr:`~TestCase.fixtures`.
 | |
| * Custom test-time :attr:`URL maps <TestCase.urls>`.
 | |
| * Test :ref:`skipping based on database backend features <skipping-tests>`.
 | |
| * The remaining specialized :ref:`assert* <assertions>` methods.
 | |
| 
 | |
| then you should use :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase` or
 | |
| :class:`~django.test.TestCase` instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``SimpleTestCase`` inherits from ``django.utils.unittest.TestCase``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| TransactionTestCase
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: TransactionTestCase()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django ``TestCase`` classes make use of database transaction facilities, if
 | |
| available, to speed up the process of resetting the database to a known state
 | |
| at the beginning of each test. A consequence of this, however, is that the
 | |
| effects of transaction commit and rollback cannot be tested by a Django
 | |
| ``TestCase`` class. If your test requires testing of such transactional
 | |
| behavior, you should use a Django ``TransactionTestCase``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``TransactionTestCase`` and ``TestCase`` are identical except for the manner
 | |
| in which the database is reset to a known state and the ability for test code
 | |
| to test the effects of commit and rollback:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * A ``TransactionTestCase`` resets the database after the test runs by
 | |
|   truncating all tables. A ``TransactionTestCase`` may call commit and rollback
 | |
|   and observe the effects of these calls on the database.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * A ``TestCase``, on the other hand, does not truncate tables after a test.
 | |
|   Instead, it encloses the test code in a database transaction that is rolled
 | |
|   back at the end of the test.  It also prevents the code under test from
 | |
|   issuing any commit or rollback operations on the database, to ensure that the
 | |
|   rollback at the end of the test restores the database to its initial state.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   When running on a database that does not support rollback (e.g. MySQL with the
 | |
|   MyISAM storage engine), ``TestCase`` falls back to initializing the database
 | |
|   by truncating tables and reloading initial data.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Prior to 1.5, ``TransactionTestCase`` flushed the database tables *before*
 | |
|     each test. In Django 1.5, this is instead done *after* the test has been run.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     When the flush took place before the test, it was guaranteed that primary
 | |
|     key values started at one in :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase`
 | |
|     tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Tests should not depend on this behaviour, but for legacy tests that do, the
 | |
|     :attr:`~TransactionTestCase.reset_sequences` attribute can be used until
 | |
|     the test has been properly updated.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|     The order in which tests are run has changed. See `Order in which tests are
 | |
|     executed`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``TransactionTestCase`` inherits from :class:`~django.test.SimpleTestCase`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TransactionTestCase.reset_sequences
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. versionadded:: 1.5
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Setting ``reset_sequences = True`` on a ``TransactionTestCase`` will make
 | |
|     sure sequences are always reset before the test run::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         class TestsThatDependsOnPrimaryKeySequences(TransactionTestCase):
 | |
|             reset_sequences = True
 | |
| 
 | |
|             def test_animal_pk(self):
 | |
|                 lion = Animal.objects.create(name="lion", sound="roar")
 | |
|                 # lion.pk is guaranteed to always be 1
 | |
|                 self.assertEqual(lion.pk, 1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Unless you are explicitly testing primary keys sequence numbers, it is
 | |
|     recommended that you do not hard code primary key values in tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Using ``reset_sequences = True`` will slow down the test, since the primary
 | |
|     key reset is an relatively expensive database operation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| TestCase
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: TestCase()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This class provides some additional capabilities that can be useful for testing
 | |
| Web sites.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Converting a normal :class:`unittest.TestCase` to a Django :class:`TestCase` is
 | |
| easy: Just change the base class of your test from `'unittest.TestCase'` to
 | |
| `'django.test.TestCase'`. All of the standard Python unit test functionality
 | |
| will continue to be available, but it will be augmented with some useful
 | |
| additions, including:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Automatic loading of fixtures.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Wraps each test in a transaction.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Creates a TestClient instance.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Django-specific assertions for testing for things like redirection and form
 | |
|   errors.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. versionchanged:: 1.5
 | |
|     The order in which tests are run has changed. See `Order in which tests are
 | |
|     executed`_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``TestCase`` inherits from :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _live-test-server:
 | |
| 
 | |
| LiveServerTestCase
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. class:: LiveServerTestCase()
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``LiveServerTestCase`` does basically the same as
 | |
| :class:`~django.test.TransactionTestCase` with one extra feature: it launches a
 | |
| live Django server in the background on setup, and shuts it down on teardown.
 | |
| This allows the use of automated test clients other than the
 | |
| :ref:`Django dummy client <test-client>` such as, for example, the Selenium_
 | |
| client, to execute a series of functional tests inside a browser and simulate a
 | |
| real user's actions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| By default the live server's address is `'localhost:8081'` and the full URL
 | |
| can be accessed during the tests with ``self.live_server_url``. If you'd like
 | |
| to change the default address (in the case, for example, where the 8081 port is
 | |
| already taken) then you may pass a different one to the :djadmin:`test` command
 | |
| via the :djadminopt:`--liveserver` option, for example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ./manage.py test --liveserver=localhost:8082
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another way of changing the default server address is by setting the
 | |
| `DJANGO_LIVE_TEST_SERVER_ADDRESS` environment variable somewhere in your
 | |
| code (for example, in a :ref:`custom test runner<topics-testing-test_runner>`):
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: python
 | |
| 
 | |
|     import os
 | |
|     os.environ['DJANGO_LIVE_TEST_SERVER_ADDRESS'] = 'localhost:8082'
 | |
| 
 | |
| In the case where the tests are run by multiple processes in parallel (for
 | |
| example, in the context of several simultaneous `continuous integration`_
 | |
| builds), the processes will compete for the same address, and therefore your
 | |
| tests might randomly fail with an "Address already in use" error. To avoid this
 | |
| problem, you can pass a comma-separated list of ports or ranges of ports (at
 | |
| least as many as the number of potential parallel processes). For example:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ./manage.py test --liveserver=localhost:8082,8090-8100,9000-9200,7041
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then, during test execution, each new live test server will try every specified
 | |
| port until it finds one that is free and takes it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _continuous integration: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_integration
 | |
| 
 | |
| To demonstrate how to use ``LiveServerTestCase``, let's write a simple Selenium
 | |
| test. First of all, you need to install the `selenium package`_ into your
 | |
| Python path:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|    pip install selenium
 | |
| 
 | |
| Then, add a ``LiveServerTestCase``-based test to your app's tests module
 | |
| (for example: ``myapp/tests.py``). The code for this test may look as follows:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: python
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import LiveServerTestCase
 | |
|     from selenium.webdriver.firefox.webdriver import WebDriver
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MySeleniumTests(LiveServerTestCase):
 | |
|         fixtures = ['user-data.json']
 | |
| 
 | |
|         @classmethod
 | |
|         def setUpClass(cls):
 | |
|             cls.selenium = WebDriver()
 | |
|             super(MySeleniumTests, cls).setUpClass()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         @classmethod
 | |
|         def tearDownClass(cls):
 | |
|             cls.selenium.quit()
 | |
|             super(MySeleniumTests, cls).tearDownClass()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_login(self):
 | |
|             self.selenium.get('%s%s' % (self.live_server_url, '/login/'))
 | |
|             username_input = self.selenium.find_element_by_name("username")
 | |
|             username_input.send_keys('myuser')
 | |
|             password_input = self.selenium.find_element_by_name("password")
 | |
|             password_input.send_keys('secret')
 | |
|             self.selenium.find_element_by_xpath('//input[@value="Log in"]').click()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Finally, you may run the test as follows:
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. code-block:: bash
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ./manage.py test myapp.MySeleniumTests.test_login
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example will automatically open Firefox then go to the login page, enter
 | |
| the credentials and press the "Log in" button. Selenium offers other drivers in
 | |
| case you do not have Firefox installed or wish to use another browser. The
 | |
| example above is just a tiny fraction of what the Selenium client can do; check
 | |
| out the `full reference`_ for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _Selenium: http://seleniumhq.org/
 | |
| .. _selenium package: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/selenium
 | |
| .. _full reference: http://selenium-python.readthedocs.org/en/latest/api.html
 | |
| .. _Firefox: http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``LiveServerTestCase`` makes use of the :doc:`staticfiles contrib app
 | |
|     </howto/static-files>` so you'll need to have your project configured
 | |
|     accordingly (in particular by setting :setting:`STATIC_URL`).
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     When using an in-memory SQLite database to run the tests, the same database
 | |
|     connection will be shared by two threads in parallel: the thread in which
 | |
|     the live server is run and the thread in which the test case is run. It's
 | |
|     important to prevent simultaneous database queries via this shared
 | |
|     connection by the two threads, as that may sometimes randomly cause the
 | |
|     tests to fail. So you need to ensure that the two threads don't access the
 | |
|     database at the same time. In particular, this means that in some cases
 | |
|     (for example, just after clicking a link or submitting a form), you might
 | |
|     need to check that a response is received by Selenium and that the next
 | |
|     page is loaded before proceeding with further test execution.
 | |
|     Do this, for example, by making Selenium wait until the `<body>` HTML tag
 | |
|     is found in the response (requires Selenium > 2.13):
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. code-block:: python
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_login(self):
 | |
|             from selenium.webdriver.support.wait import WebDriverWait
 | |
|             timeout = 2
 | |
|             ...
 | |
|             self.selenium.find_element_by_xpath('//input[@value="Log in"]').click()
 | |
|             # Wait until the response is received
 | |
|             WebDriverWait(self.selenium, timeout).until(
 | |
|                 lambda driver: driver.find_element_by_tag_name('body'))
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The tricky thing here is that there's really no such thing as a "page load,"
 | |
|     especially in modern Web apps that generate HTML dynamically after the
 | |
|     server generates the initial document. So, simply checking for the presence
 | |
|     of `<body>` in the response might not necessarily be appropriate for all
 | |
|     use cases. Please refer to the `Selenium FAQ`_ and
 | |
|     `Selenium documentation`_ for more information.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. _Selenium FAQ: http://code.google.com/p/selenium/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#Q:_WebDriver_fails_to_find_elements_/_Does_not_block_on_page_loa
 | |
|     .. _Selenium documentation: http://seleniumhq.org/docs/04_webdriver_advanced.html#explicit-waits
 | |
| 
 | |
| Test cases features
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Default test client
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TestCase.client
 | |
| 
 | |
| Every test case in a ``django.test.TestCase`` instance has access to an
 | |
| instance of a Django test client. This client can be accessed as
 | |
| ``self.client``. This client is recreated for each test, so you don't have to
 | |
| worry about state (such as cookies) carrying over from one test to another.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This means, instead of instantiating a ``Client`` in each test::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.utils import unittest
 | |
|     from django.test.client import Client
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class SimpleTest(unittest.TestCase):
 | |
|         def test_details(self):
 | |
|             client = Client()
 | |
|             response = client.get('/customer/details/')
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_index(self):
 | |
|             client = Client()
 | |
|             response = client.get('/customer/index/')
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...you can just refer to ``self.client``, like so::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class SimpleTest(TestCase):
 | |
|         def test_details(self):
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/customer/details/')
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_index(self):
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/customer/index/')
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(response.status_code, 200)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Customizing the test client
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TestCase.client_class
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want to use a different ``Client`` class (for example, a subclass
 | |
| with customized behavior), use the :attr:`~TestCase.client_class` class
 | |
| attribute::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
|     from django.test.client import Client
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyTestClient(Client):
 | |
|         # Specialized methods for your environment...
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyTest(TestCase):
 | |
|         client_class = MyTestClient
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_my_stuff(self):
 | |
|             # Here self.client is an instance of MyTestClient...
 | |
|             call_some_test_code()
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-testing-fixtures:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Fixture loading
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TestCase.fixtures
 | |
| 
 | |
| A test case for a database-backed Web site isn't much use if there isn't any
 | |
| data in the database. To make it easy to put test data into the database,
 | |
| Django's custom ``TestCase`` class provides a way of loading **fixtures**.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A fixture is a collection of data that Django knows how to import into a
 | |
| database. For example, if your site has user accounts, you might set up a
 | |
| fixture of fake user accounts in order to populate your database during tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The most straightforward way of creating a fixture is to use the
 | |
| :djadmin:`manage.py dumpdata <dumpdata>` command. This assumes you
 | |
| already have some data in your database. See the :djadmin:`dumpdata
 | |
| documentation<dumpdata>` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If you've ever run :djadmin:`manage.py syncdb<syncdb>`, you've
 | |
|     already used a fixture without even knowing it! When you call
 | |
|     :djadmin:`syncdb` in the database for the first time, Django
 | |
|     installs a fixture called ``initial_data``. This gives you a way
 | |
|     of populating a new database with any initial data, such as a
 | |
|     default set of categories.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Fixtures with other names can always be installed manually using
 | |
|     the :djadmin:`manage.py loaddata<loaddata>` command.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. admonition:: Initial SQL data and testing
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Django provides a second way to insert initial data into models --
 | |
|     the :ref:`custom SQL hook <initial-sql>`. However, this technique
 | |
|     *cannot* be used to provide initial data for testing purposes.
 | |
|     Django's test framework flushes the contents of the test database
 | |
|     after each test; as a result, any data added using the custom SQL
 | |
|     hook will be lost.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once you've created a fixture and placed it in a ``fixtures`` directory in one
 | |
| of your :setting:`INSTALLED_APPS`, you can use it in your unit tests by
 | |
| specifying a ``fixtures`` class attribute on your :class:`django.test.TestCase`
 | |
| subclass::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
|     from myapp.models import Animal
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class AnimalTestCase(TestCase):
 | |
|         fixtures = ['mammals.json', 'birds']
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def setUp(self):
 | |
|             # Test definitions as before.
 | |
|             call_setup_methods()
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def testFluffyAnimals(self):
 | |
|             # A test that uses the fixtures.
 | |
|             call_some_test_code()
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here's specifically what will happen:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * At the start of each test case, before ``setUp()`` is run, Django will
 | |
|   flush the database, returning the database to the state it was in
 | |
|   directly after :djadmin:`syncdb` was called.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Then, all the named fixtures are installed. In this example, Django will
 | |
|   install any JSON fixture named ``mammals``, followed by any fixture named
 | |
|   ``birds``. See the :djadmin:`loaddata` documentation for more
 | |
|   details on defining and installing fixtures.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This flush/load procedure is repeated for each test in the test case, so you
 | |
| can be certain that the outcome of a test will not be affected by another test,
 | |
| or by the order of test execution.
 | |
| 
 | |
| URLconf configuration
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TestCase.urls
 | |
| 
 | |
| If your application provides views, you may want to include tests that use the
 | |
| test client to exercise those views. However, an end user is free to deploy the
 | |
| views in your application at any URL of their choosing. This means that your
 | |
| tests can't rely upon the fact that your views will be available at a
 | |
| particular URL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to provide a reliable URL space for your test,
 | |
| ``django.test.TestCase`` provides the ability to customize the URLconf
 | |
| configuration for the duration of the execution of a test suite. If your
 | |
| ``TestCase`` instance defines an ``urls`` attribute, the ``TestCase`` will use
 | |
| the value of that attribute as the :setting:`ROOT_URLCONF` for the duration
 | |
| of that test.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class TestMyViews(TestCase):
 | |
|         urls = 'myapp.test_urls'
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def testIndexPageView(self):
 | |
|             # Here you'd test your view using ``Client``.
 | |
|             call_some_test_code()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This test case will use the contents of ``myapp.test_urls`` as the
 | |
| URLconf for the duration of the test case.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _emptying-test-outbox:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Multi-database support
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. attribute:: TestCase.multi_db
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django sets up a test database corresponding to every database that is
 | |
| defined in the :setting:`DATABASES` definition in your settings
 | |
| file. However, a big part of the time taken to run a Django TestCase
 | |
| is consumed by the call to ``flush`` that ensures that you have a
 | |
| clean database at the start of each test run. If you have multiple
 | |
| databases, multiple flushes are required (one for each database),
 | |
| which can be a time consuming activity -- especially if your tests
 | |
| don't need to test multi-database activity.
 | |
| 
 | |
| As an optimization, Django only flushes the ``default`` database at
 | |
| the start of each test run. If your setup contains multiple databases,
 | |
| and you have a test that requires every database to be clean, you can
 | |
| use the ``multi_db`` attribute on the test suite to request a full
 | |
| flush.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class TestMyViews(TestCase):
 | |
|         multi_db = True
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def testIndexPageView(self):
 | |
|             call_some_test_code()
 | |
| 
 | |
| This test case will flush *all* the test databases before running
 | |
| ``testIndexPageView``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _overriding-settings:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Overriding settings
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.settings
 | |
| 
 | |
| For testing purposes it's often useful to change a setting temporarily and
 | |
| revert to the original value after running the testing code. For this use case
 | |
| Django provides a standard Python context manager (see :pep:`343`)
 | |
| :meth:`~django.test.TestCase.settings`, which can be used like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class LoginTestCase(TestCase):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_login(self):
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # First check for the default behavior
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/sekrit/')
 | |
|             self.assertRedirects(response, '/accounts/login/?next=/sekrit/')
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Then override the LOGIN_URL setting
 | |
|             with self.settings(LOGIN_URL='/other/login/'):
 | |
|                 response = self.client.get('/sekrit/')
 | |
|                 self.assertRedirects(response, '/other/login/?next=/sekrit/')
 | |
| 
 | |
| This example will override the :setting:`LOGIN_URL` setting for the code
 | |
| in the ``with`` block and reset its value to the previous state afterwards.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.test.utils
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: override_settings
 | |
| 
 | |
| In case you want to override a setting for just one test method or even the
 | |
| whole :class:`~django.test.TestCase` class, Django provides the
 | |
| :func:`~django.test.utils.override_settings` decorator (see :pep:`318`). It's
 | |
| used like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
|     from django.test.utils import override_settings
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class LoginTestCase(TestCase):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         @override_settings(LOGIN_URL='/other/login/')
 | |
|         def test_login(self):
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/sekrit/')
 | |
|             self.assertRedirects(response, '/other/login/?next=/sekrit/')
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decorator can also be applied to test case classes::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
|     from django.test.utils import override_settings
 | |
| 
 | |
|     @override_settings(LOGIN_URL='/other/login/')
 | |
|     class LoginTestCase(TestCase):
 | |
| 
 | |
|         def test_login(self):
 | |
|             response = self.client.get('/sekrit/')
 | |
|             self.assertRedirects(response, '/other/login/?next=/sekrit/')
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. note::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     When given a class, the decorator modifies the class directly and
 | |
|     returns it; it doesn't create and return a modified copy of it.  So if
 | |
|     you try to tweak the above example to assign the return value to a
 | |
|     different name than ``LoginTestCase``, you may be surprised to find that
 | |
|     the original ``LoginTestCase`` is still equally affected by the
 | |
|     decorator.
 | |
| 
 | |
| When overriding settings, make sure to handle the cases in which your app's
 | |
| code uses a cache or similar feature that retains state even if the
 | |
| setting is changed. Django provides the
 | |
| :data:`django.test.signals.setting_changed` signal that lets you register
 | |
| callbacks to clean up and otherwise reset state when settings are changed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Django itself uses this signal to reset various data:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ================================ ========================
 | |
| Overriden settings               Data reset
 | |
| ================================ ========================
 | |
| USE_TZ, TIME_ZONE                Databases timezone
 | |
| TEMPLATE_CONTEXT_PROCESSORS      Context processors cache
 | |
| TEMPLATE_LOADERS                 Template loaders cache
 | |
| SERIALIZATION_MODULES            Serializers cache
 | |
| LOCALE_PATHS, LANGUAGE_CODE      Default translation and loaded translations
 | |
| MEDIA_ROOT, DEFAULT_FILE_STORAGE Default file storage
 | |
| ================================ ========================
 | |
| 
 | |
| Emptying the test outbox
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you use Django's custom ``TestCase`` class, the test runner will clear the
 | |
| contents of the test email outbox at the start of each test case.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For more detail on email services during tests, see `Email services`_ below.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _assertions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Assertions
 | |
| ~~~~~~~~~~
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.test
 | |
| 
 | |
| As Python's normal :class:`unittest.TestCase` class implements assertion methods
 | |
| such as :meth:`~unittest.TestCase.assertTrue` and
 | |
| :meth:`~unittest.TestCase.assertEqual`, Django's custom :class:`TestCase` class
 | |
| provides a number of custom assertion methods that are useful for testing Web
 | |
| applications:
 | |
| 
 | |
| The failure messages given by most of these assertion methods can be customized
 | |
| with the ``msg_prefix`` argument. This string will be prefixed to any failure
 | |
| message generated by the assertion. This allows you to provide additional
 | |
| details that may help you to identify the location and cause of an failure in
 | |
| your test suite.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertRaisesMessage(expected_exception, expected_message, callable_obj=None, *args, **kwargs)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that execution of callable ``callable_obj`` raised the
 | |
|     ``expected_exception`` exception and that such exception has an
 | |
|     ``expected_message`` representation. Any other outcome is reported as a
 | |
|     failure. Similar to unittest's :meth:`~unittest.TestCase.assertRaisesRegexp`
 | |
|     with the difference that ``expected_message`` isn't a regular expression.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertFieldOutput(self, fieldclass, valid, invalid, field_args=None, field_kwargs=None, empty_value=u'')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that a form field behaves correctly with various inputs.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     :param fieldclass: the class of the field to be tested.
 | |
|     :param valid: a dictionary mapping valid inputs to their expected cleaned
 | |
|         values.
 | |
|     :param invalid: a dictionary mapping invalid inputs to one or more raised
 | |
|         error messages.
 | |
|     :param field_args: the args passed to instantiate the field.
 | |
|     :param field_kwargs: the kwargs passed to instantiate the field.
 | |
|     :param empty_value: the expected clean output for inputs in ``empty_values``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     For example, the following code tests that an ``EmailField`` accepts
 | |
|     "a@a.com" as a valid email address, but rejects "aaa" with a reasonable
 | |
|     error message::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         self.assertFieldOutput(EmailField, {'a@a.com': 'a@a.com'}, {'aaa': [u'Enter a valid email address.']})
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertContains(response, text, count=None, status_code=200, msg_prefix='', html=False)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that a ``Response`` instance produced the given ``status_code`` and
 | |
|     that ``text`` appears in the content of the response. If ``count`` is
 | |
|     provided, ``text`` must occur exactly ``count`` times in the response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Set ``html`` to ``True`` to handle ``text`` as HTML. The comparison with
 | |
|     the response content will be based on HTML semantics instead of
 | |
|     character-by-character equality. Whitespace is ignored in most cases,
 | |
|     attribute ordering is not significant. See
 | |
|     :meth:`~SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLEqual` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertNotContains(response, text, status_code=200, msg_prefix='', html=False)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that a ``Response`` instance produced the given ``status_code`` and
 | |
|     that ``text`` does not appears in the content of the response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Set ``html`` to ``True`` to handle ``text`` as HTML. The comparison with
 | |
|     the response content will be based on HTML semantics instead of
 | |
|     character-by-character equality. Whitespace is ignored in most cases,
 | |
|     attribute ordering is not significant. See
 | |
|     :meth:`~SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLEqual` for more details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertFormError(response, form, field, errors, msg_prefix='')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that a field on a form raises the provided list of errors when
 | |
|     rendered on the form.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``form`` is the name the ``Form`` instance was given in the template
 | |
|     context.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``field`` is the name of the field on the form to check. If ``field``
 | |
|     has a value of ``None``, non-field errors (errors you can access via
 | |
|     ``form.non_field_errors()``) will be checked.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``errors`` is an error string, or a list of error strings, that are
 | |
|     expected as a result of form validation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertTemplateUsed(response, template_name, msg_prefix='')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the template with the given name was used in rendering the
 | |
|     response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The name is a string such as ``'admin/index.html'``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     You can use this as a context manager, like this::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         with self.assertTemplateUsed('index.html'):
 | |
|             render_to_string('index.html')
 | |
|         with self.assertTemplateUsed(template_name='index.html'):
 | |
|             render_to_string('index.html')
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertTemplateNotUsed(response, template_name, msg_prefix='')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the template with the given name was *not* used in rendering
 | |
|     the response.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     You can use this as a context manager in the same way as
 | |
|     :meth:`~TestCase.assertTemplateUsed`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertRedirects(response, expected_url, status_code=302, target_status_code=200, msg_prefix='')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the response return a ``status_code`` redirect status, it
 | |
|     redirected to ``expected_url`` (including any GET data), and the final
 | |
|     page was received with ``target_status_code``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If your request used the ``follow`` argument, the ``expected_url`` and
 | |
|     ``target_status_code`` will be the url and status code for the final
 | |
|     point of the redirect chain.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertQuerysetEqual(qs, values, transform=repr, ordered=True)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that a queryset ``qs`` returns a particular list of values ``values``.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The comparison of the contents of ``qs`` and ``values`` is performed using
 | |
|     the function ``transform``; by default, this means that the ``repr()`` of
 | |
|     each value is compared. Any other callable can be used if ``repr()`` doesn't
 | |
|     provide a unique or helpful comparison.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     By default, the comparison is also ordering dependent. If ``qs`` doesn't
 | |
|     provide an implicit ordering, you can set the ``ordered`` parameter to
 | |
|     ``False``, which turns the comparison into a Python set comparison.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. versionchanged:: 1.6
 | |
|         The method now checks for undefined order and raises ``ValueError``
 | |
|         if undefined order is spotted. The ordering is seen as undefined if
 | |
|         the given ``qs`` isn't ordered and the comparison is against more
 | |
|         than one ordered values.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: TestCase.assertNumQueries(num, func, *args, **kwargs)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that when ``func`` is called with ``*args`` and ``**kwargs`` that
 | |
|     ``num`` database queries are executed.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     If a ``"using"`` key is present in ``kwargs`` it is used as the database
 | |
|     alias for which to check the number of queries.  If you wish to call a
 | |
|     function with a ``using`` parameter you can do it by wrapping the call with
 | |
|     a ``lambda`` to add an extra parameter::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         self.assertNumQueries(7, lambda: my_function(using=7))
 | |
| 
 | |
|     You can also use this as a context manager::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         with self.assertNumQueries(2):
 | |
|             Person.objects.create(name="Aaron")
 | |
|             Person.objects.create(name="Daniel")
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLEqual(html1, html2, msg=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the strings ``html1`` and ``html2`` are equal. The comparison
 | |
|     is based on HTML semantics. The comparison takes following things into
 | |
|     account:
 | |
| 
 | |
|     * Whitespace before and after HTML tags is ignored.
 | |
|     * All types of whitespace are considered equivalent.
 | |
|     * All open tags are closed implicitly, e.g. when a surrounding tag is
 | |
|       closed or the HTML document ends.
 | |
|     * Empty tags are equivalent to their self-closing version.
 | |
|     * The ordering of attributes of an HTML element is not significant.
 | |
|     * Attributes without an argument are equal to attributes that equal in
 | |
|       name and value (see the examples).
 | |
| 
 | |
|     The following examples are valid tests and don't raise any
 | |
|     ``AssertionError``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|         self.assertHTMLEqual('<p>Hello <b>world!</p>',
 | |
|             '''<p>
 | |
|                 Hello   <b>world! <b/>
 | |
|             </p>''')
 | |
|         self.assertHTMLEqual(
 | |
|             '<input type="checkbox" checked="checked" id="id_accept_terms" />',
 | |
|             '<input id="id_accept_terms" type='checkbox' checked>')
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``html1`` and ``html2`` must be valid HTML. An ``AssertionError`` will be
 | |
|     raised if one of them cannot be parsed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLNotEqual(html1, html2, msg=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the strings ``html1`` and ``html2`` are *not* equal. The
 | |
|     comparison is based on HTML semantics. See
 | |
|     :meth:`~SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLEqual` for details.
 | |
| 
 | |
|     ``html1`` and ``html2`` must be valid HTML. An ``AssertionError`` will be
 | |
|     raised if one of them cannot be parsed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertXMLEqual(xml1, xml2, msg=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. versionadded:: 1.5
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the strings ``xml1`` and ``xml2`` are equal. The
 | |
|     comparison is based on XML semantics. Similarily to
 | |
|     :meth:`~SimpleTestCase.assertHTMLEqual`, the comparison is
 | |
|     made on parsed content, hence only semantic differences are considered, not
 | |
|     syntax differences. When unvalid XML is passed in any parameter, an
 | |
|     ``AssertionError`` is always raised, even if both string are identical.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. method:: SimpleTestCase.assertXMLNotEqual(xml1, xml2, msg=None)
 | |
| 
 | |
|     .. versionadded:: 1.5
 | |
| 
 | |
|     Asserts that the strings ``xml1`` and ``xml2`` are *not* equal. The
 | |
|     comparison is based on XML semantics. See
 | |
|     :meth:`~SimpleTestCase.assertXMLEqual` for details.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _topics-testing-email:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Email services
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| If any of your Django views send email using :doc:`Django's email
 | |
| functionality </topics/email>`, you probably don't want to send email each time
 | |
| you run a test using that view. For this reason, Django's test runner
 | |
| automatically redirects all Django-sent email to a dummy outbox. This lets you
 | |
| test every aspect of sending email -- from the number of messages sent to the
 | |
| contents of each message -- without actually sending the messages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The test runner accomplishes this by transparently replacing the normal
 | |
| email backend with a testing backend.
 | |
| (Don't worry -- this has no effect on any other email senders outside of
 | |
| Django, such as your machine's mail server, if you're running one.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.core.mail
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. data:: django.core.mail.outbox
 | |
| 
 | |
| During test running, each outgoing email is saved in
 | |
| ``django.core.mail.outbox``. This is a simple list of all
 | |
| :class:`~django.core.mail.EmailMessage` instances that have been sent.
 | |
| The ``outbox`` attribute is a special attribute that is created *only* when
 | |
| the ``locmem`` email backend is used. It doesn't normally exist as part of the
 | |
| :mod:`django.core.mail` module and you can't import it directly. The code
 | |
| below shows how to access this attribute correctly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Here's an example test that examines ``django.core.mail.outbox`` for length
 | |
| and contents::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.core import mail
 | |
|     from django.test import TestCase
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class EmailTest(TestCase):
 | |
|         def test_send_email(self):
 | |
|             # Send message.
 | |
|             mail.send_mail('Subject here', 'Here is the message.',
 | |
|                 'from@example.com', ['to@example.com'],
 | |
|                 fail_silently=False)
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Test that one message has been sent.
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(len(mail.outbox), 1)
 | |
| 
 | |
|             # Verify that the subject of the first message is correct.
 | |
|             self.assertEqual(mail.outbox[0].subject, 'Subject here')
 | |
| 
 | |
| As noted :ref:`previously <emptying-test-outbox>`, the test outbox is emptied
 | |
| at the start of every test in a Django ``TestCase``. To empty the outbox
 | |
| manually, assign the empty list to ``mail.outbox``::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     from django.core import mail
 | |
| 
 | |
|     # Empty the test outbox
 | |
|     mail.outbox = []
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _skipping-tests:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Skipping tests
 | |
| --------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. currentmodule:: django.test
 | |
| 
 | |
| The unittest library provides the :func:`@skipIf <unittest.skipIf>` and
 | |
| :func:`@skipUnless <unittest.skipUnless>` decorators to allow you to skip tests
 | |
| if you know ahead of time that those tests are going to fail under certain
 | |
| conditions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, if your test requires a particular optional library in order to
 | |
| succeed, you could decorate the test case with :func:`@skipIf
 | |
| <unittest.skipIf>`. Then, the test runner will report that the test wasn't
 | |
| executed and why, instead of failing the test or omitting the test altogether.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To supplement these test skipping behaviors, Django provides two
 | |
| additional skip decorators. Instead of testing a generic boolean,
 | |
| these decorators check the capabilities of the database, and skip the
 | |
| test if the database doesn't support a specific named feature.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The decorators use a string identifier to describe database features.
 | |
| This string corresponds to attributes of the database connection
 | |
| features class. See ``django.db.backends.BaseDatabaseFeatures``
 | |
| class for a full list of database features that can be used as a basis
 | |
| for skipping tests.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: skipIfDBFeature(feature_name_string)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Skip the decorated test if the named database feature is supported.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, the following test will not be executed if the database
 | |
| supports transactions (e.g., it would *not* run under PostgreSQL, but
 | |
| it would under MySQL with MyISAM tables)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyTests(TestCase):
 | |
|         @skipIfDBFeature('supports_transactions')
 | |
|         def test_transaction_behavior(self):
 | |
|             # ... conditional test code
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. function:: skipUnlessDBFeature(feature_name_string)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Skip the decorated test if the named database feature is *not*
 | |
| supported.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For example, the following test will only be executed if the database
 | |
| supports transactions (e.g., it would run under PostgreSQL, but *not*
 | |
| under MySQL with MyISAM tables)::
 | |
| 
 | |
|     class MyTests(TestCase):
 | |
|         @skipUnlessDBFeature('supports_transactions')
 | |
|         def test_transaction_behavior(self):
 | |
|             # ... conditional test code
 |