mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git
258 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
258 lines
10 KiB
Plaintext
=====================================
|
|
Cross Site Request Forgery protection
|
|
=====================================
|
|
|
|
.. module:: django.middleware.csrf
|
|
:synopsis: Protects against Cross Site Request Forgeries
|
|
|
|
The CSRF middleware and template tag provides easy-to-use protection against
|
|
`Cross Site Request Forgeries`_. This type of attack occurs when a malicious
|
|
website contains a link, a form button or some JavaScript that is intended to
|
|
perform some action on your website, using the credentials of a logged-in user
|
|
who visits the malicious site in their browser. A related type of attack,
|
|
'login CSRF', where an attacking site tricks a user's browser into logging into
|
|
a site with someone else's credentials, is also covered.
|
|
|
|
The first defense against CSRF attacks is to ensure that GET requests (and other
|
|
'safe' methods, as defined by :rfc:`9110#section-9.2.1`) are side effect free.
|
|
Requests via 'unsafe' methods, such as POST, PUT, and DELETE, can then be
|
|
protected by the steps outlined in :ref:`using-csrf`.
|
|
|
|
.. _Cross Site Request Forgeries: https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/csrf#overview
|
|
|
|
.. _how-csrf-works:
|
|
|
|
How it works
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
The CSRF protection is based on the following things:
|
|
|
|
#. A CSRF cookie that is a random secret value, which other sites will not have
|
|
access to.
|
|
|
|
``CsrfViewMiddleware`` sends this cookie with the response whenever
|
|
``django.middleware.csrf.get_token()`` is called. It can also send it in
|
|
other cases. For security reasons, the value of the secret is changed each
|
|
time a user logs in.
|
|
|
|
#. A hidden form field with the name 'csrfmiddlewaretoken', present in all
|
|
outgoing POST forms.
|
|
|
|
In order to protect against `BREACH`_ attacks, the value of this field is
|
|
not simply the secret. It is scrambled differently with each response using
|
|
a mask. The mask is generated randomly on every call to ``get_token()``, so
|
|
the form field value is different each time.
|
|
|
|
This part is done by the :ttag:`csrf_token` template tag.
|
|
|
|
#. For all incoming requests that are not using HTTP GET, HEAD, OPTIONS or
|
|
TRACE, a CSRF cookie must be present, and the 'csrfmiddlewaretoken' field
|
|
must be present and correct. If it isn't, the user will get a 403 error.
|
|
|
|
When validating the 'csrfmiddlewaretoken' field value, only the secret,
|
|
not the full token, is compared with the secret in the cookie value.
|
|
This allows the use of ever-changing tokens. While each request may use its
|
|
own token, the secret remains common to all.
|
|
|
|
This check is done by ``CsrfViewMiddleware``.
|
|
|
|
#. ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` verifies the `Origin header`_, if provided by the
|
|
browser, against the current host and the :setting:`CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS`
|
|
setting. This provides protection against cross-subdomain attacks.
|
|
|
|
#. In addition, for HTTPS requests, if the ``Origin`` header isn't provided,
|
|
``CsrfViewMiddleware`` performs strict referer checking. This means that
|
|
even if a subdomain can set or modify cookies on your domain, it can't force
|
|
a user to post to your application since that request won't come from your
|
|
own exact domain.
|
|
|
|
This also addresses a man-in-the-middle attack that's possible under HTTPS
|
|
when using a session independent secret, due to the fact that HTTP
|
|
``Set-Cookie`` headers are (unfortunately) accepted by clients even when
|
|
they are talking to a site under HTTPS. (Referer checking is not done for
|
|
HTTP requests because the presence of the ``Referer`` header isn't reliable
|
|
enough under HTTP.)
|
|
|
|
If the :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN` setting is set, the referer is compared
|
|
against it. You can allow cross-subdomain requests by including a leading
|
|
dot. For example, ``CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN = '.example.com'`` will allow POST
|
|
requests from ``www.example.com`` and ``api.example.com``. If the setting is
|
|
not set, then the referer must match the HTTP ``Host`` header.
|
|
|
|
Expanding the accepted referers beyond the current host or cookie domain can
|
|
be done with the :setting:`CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS` setting.
|
|
|
|
This ensures that only forms that have originated from trusted domains can be
|
|
used to POST data back.
|
|
|
|
It deliberately ignores GET requests (and other requests that are defined as
|
|
'safe' by :rfc:`9110#section-9.2.1`). These requests ought never to have any
|
|
potentially dangerous side effects, and so a CSRF attack with a GET request
|
|
ought to be harmless. :rfc:`9110#section-9.2.1` defines POST, PUT, and DELETE
|
|
as 'unsafe', and all other methods are also assumed to be unsafe, for maximum
|
|
protection.
|
|
|
|
The CSRF protection cannot protect against man-in-the-middle attacks, so use
|
|
:ref:`HTTPS <security-recommendation-ssl>` with
|
|
:ref:`http-strict-transport-security`. It also assumes :ref:`validation of
|
|
the HOST header <host-headers-virtual-hosting>` and that there aren't any
|
|
:ref:`cross-site scripting vulnerabilities <cross-site-scripting>` on your site
|
|
(because XSS vulnerabilities already let an attacker do anything a CSRF
|
|
vulnerability allows and much worse).
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Removing the ``Referer`` header
|
|
|
|
To avoid disclosing the referrer URL to third-party sites, you might want
|
|
to `disable the referer`_ on your site's ``<a>`` tags. For example, you
|
|
might use the ``<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">`` tag or
|
|
include the ``Referrer-Policy: no-referrer`` header. Due to the CSRF
|
|
protection's strict referer checking on HTTPS requests, those techniques
|
|
cause a CSRF failure on requests with 'unsafe' methods. Instead, use
|
|
alternatives like ``<a rel="noreferrer" ...>"`` for links to third-party
|
|
sites.
|
|
|
|
.. _BREACH: https://www.breachattack.com/
|
|
.. _Origin header: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Origin
|
|
.. _disable the referer: https://www.w3.org/TR/referrer-policy/#referrer-policy-delivery
|
|
|
|
.. _csrf-limitations:
|
|
|
|
Limitations
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
Subdomains within a site will be able to set cookies on the client for the whole
|
|
domain. By setting the cookie and using a corresponding token, subdomains will
|
|
be able to circumvent the CSRF protection. The only way to avoid this is to
|
|
ensure that subdomains are controlled by trusted users (or, are at least unable
|
|
to set cookies). Note that even without CSRF, there are other vulnerabilities,
|
|
such as session fixation, that make giving subdomains to untrusted parties a bad
|
|
idea, and these vulnerabilities cannot easily be fixed with current browsers.
|
|
|
|
Utilities
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
.. module:: django.views.decorators.csrf
|
|
|
|
The examples below assume you are using function-based views. If you
|
|
are working with class-based views, you can refer to :ref:`Decorating
|
|
class-based views<decorating-class-based-views>`.
|
|
|
|
.. function:: csrf_exempt(view)
|
|
|
|
This decorator marks a view as being exempt from the protection ensured by
|
|
the middleware. Example::
|
|
|
|
from django.http import HttpResponse
|
|
from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_exempt
|
|
|
|
|
|
@csrf_exempt
|
|
def my_view(request):
|
|
return HttpResponse("Hello world")
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 5.0
|
|
|
|
Support for wrapping asynchronous view functions was added.
|
|
|
|
.. function:: csrf_protect(view)
|
|
|
|
Decorator that provides the protection of ``CsrfViewMiddleware`` to a view.
|
|
|
|
Usage::
|
|
|
|
from django.shortcuts import render
|
|
from django.views.decorators.csrf import csrf_protect
|
|
|
|
|
|
@csrf_protect
|
|
def my_view(request):
|
|
c = {}
|
|
# ...
|
|
return render(request, "a_template.html", c)
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 5.0
|
|
|
|
Support for wrapping asynchronous view functions was added.
|
|
|
|
.. function:: requires_csrf_token(view)
|
|
|
|
Normally the :ttag:`csrf_token` template tag will not work if
|
|
``CsrfViewMiddleware.process_view`` or an equivalent like ``csrf_protect``
|
|
has not run. The view decorator ``requires_csrf_token`` can be used to
|
|
ensure the template tag does work. This decorator works similarly to
|
|
``csrf_protect``, but never rejects an incoming request.
|
|
|
|
Example::
|
|
|
|
from django.shortcuts import render
|
|
from django.views.decorators.csrf import requires_csrf_token
|
|
|
|
|
|
@requires_csrf_token
|
|
def my_view(request):
|
|
c = {}
|
|
# ...
|
|
return render(request, "a_template.html", c)
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 5.0
|
|
|
|
Support for wrapping asynchronous view functions was added.
|
|
|
|
.. function:: ensure_csrf_cookie(view)
|
|
|
|
This decorator forces a view to send the CSRF cookie.
|
|
|
|
.. versionchanged:: 5.0
|
|
|
|
Support for wrapping asynchronous view functions was added.
|
|
|
|
Settings
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
A number of settings can be used to control Django's CSRF behavior:
|
|
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_AGE`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_DOMAIN`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_HTTPONLY`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_NAME`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_PATH`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_SAMESITE`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_COOKIE_SECURE`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_FAILURE_VIEW`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_HEADER_NAME`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_TRUSTED_ORIGINS`
|
|
* :setting:`CSRF_USE_SESSIONS`
|
|
|
|
Frequently Asked Questions
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
Is posting an arbitrary CSRF token pair (cookie and POST data) a vulnerability?
|
|
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No, this is by design. Without a man-in-the-middle attack, there is no way for
|
|
an attacker to send a CSRF token cookie to a victim's browser, so a successful
|
|
attack would need to obtain the victim's browser's cookie via XSS or similar,
|
|
in which case an attacker usually doesn't need CSRF attacks.
|
|
|
|
Some security audit tools flag this as a problem but as mentioned before, an
|
|
attacker cannot steal a user's browser's CSRF cookie. "Stealing" or modifying
|
|
*your own* token using Firebug, Chrome dev tools, etc. isn't a vulnerability.
|
|
|
|
Is it a problem that Django's CSRF protection isn't linked to a session by default?
|
|
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
No, this is by design. Not linking CSRF protection to a session allows using
|
|
the protection on sites such as a *pastebin* that allow submissions from
|
|
anonymous users which don't have a session.
|
|
|
|
If you wish to store the CSRF token in the user's session, use the
|
|
:setting:`CSRF_USE_SESSIONS` setting.
|
|
|
|
Why might a user encounter a CSRF validation failure after logging in?
|
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
For security reasons, CSRF tokens are rotated each time a user logs in. Any
|
|
page with a form generated before a login will have an old, invalid CSRF token
|
|
and need to be reloaded. This might happen if a user uses the back button after
|
|
a login or if they log in a different browser tab.
|