1
0
mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git synced 2024-12-28 20:16:19 +00:00
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kevin Christopher Henry
9d700322b3 Fixed #19885 -- cleaned up the django.test namespace
* override_settings may now be imported from django.test
* removed Approximate from django.test
* updated documentation for things importable from django.test

Thanks akaariai for the suggestion.
2013-09-09 16:03:13 -04:00
Alasdair Nicol
22c6497f99 Fixed #20895 -- Made check management command warn if a BooleanField does not have a default value
Thanks to Collin Anderson for the suggestion and Tim Graham for
reviewing the patch.
2013-08-15 19:47:26 -04:00
Florian Hahn
e888a9b30d Fixed #15624 -- Made sure aggregations are present in SELECT 2013-07-31 16:27:58 +03:00
Claude Paroz
5c1143910e Removed most of absolute_import imports
Should be unneeded with Python 2.7 and up.
Added some unicode_literals along the way.
2013-07-29 20:28:13 +02:00
Aymeric Augustin
cfcf4b3605 Stopped using django.utils.unittest in the test suite.
Refs #20680.
2013-07-01 14:29:33 +02:00
Anssi Kääriäinen
33dd8f5442 Fixed random aggregation_regress test_more_more_more() failure
The cause was assuming that an unordered queryset returns the values
always in the same order.
2013-05-28 08:55:04 +03:00
Anssi Kääriäinen
bd0cba58aa Fixed failing aggregation tests on MySQL 2013-03-13 12:44:24 +02:00
Anssi Kääriäinen
d3f00bd570 Refactored qs.add_q() and utils/tree.py
The sql/query.py add_q method did a lot of where/having tree hacking to
get complex queries to work correctly. The logic was refactored so that
it should be simpler to understand. The new logic should also produce
leaner WHERE conditions.

The changes cascade somewhat, as some other parts of Django (like
add_filter() and WhereNode) expect boolean trees in certain format or
they fail to work. So to fix the add_q() one must fix utils/tree.py,
some things in add_filter(), WhereNode and so on.

This commit also fixed add_filter to see negate clauses up the path.
A query like .exclude(Q(reversefk__in=a_list)) didn't work similarly to
.filter(~Q(reversefk__in=a_list)). The reason for this is that only
the immediate parent negate clauses were seen by add_filter, and thus a
tree like AND: (NOT AND: (AND: condition)) will not be handled
correctly, as there is one intermediary AND node in the tree. The
example tree is generated by .exclude(~Q(reversefk__in=a_list)).

Still, aggregation lost connectors in OR cases, and F() objects and
aggregates in same filter clause caused GROUP BY problems on some
databases.

Fixed #17600, fixed #13198, fixed #17025, fixed #17000, fixed #11293.
2013-03-13 10:44:49 +02:00
Florian Apolloner
89f40e3624 Merged regressiontests and modeltests into the test root. 2013-02-26 14:36:57 +01:00