The added promotion logic is based on promoting any joins used in only
some of the childs of an OR clause unless the join existed before the
OR clause addition.
This is a rather large refactoring. The "lookup traversal" code was
splitted out from the setup_joins. There is now names_to_path() method
which does the lookup traveling, the actual work of setup_joins() is
calling names_to_path() and then adding the joins found into the query.
As a side effect it was possible to remove the "process_extra"
functionality used by genric relations. This never worked for left
joins. Now the extra restriction is appended directly to the join
condition instead of the where clause.
To generate the extra condition we need to have the join field
available in the compiler. This has the side-effect that we need more
ugly code in Query.__getstate__ and __setstate__ as Field objects
aren't pickleable.
The join trimming code got a big change - now we trim all direct joins
and never trim reverse joins. This also fixes the problem in #10790
which was join trimming in null filter cases.
The ORM generated a query with INNER JOIN instead of LEFT OUTER JOIN
in a somewhat complicated case. The main issue was that there was a
chain of nullable FK -> non-nullble FK, and the join promotion logic
didn't see the need to promote the non-nullable FK even if the
previous nullable FK was already promoted to LOUTER JOIN. This resulted
in a query like a LOUTER b INNER c, which incorrectly prunes results.
* Renamed the __unicode__ methods
* Applied the python_2_unicode_compatible decorator
* Removed the StrAndUnicode mix-in that is superseded by
python_2_unicode_compatible
* Kept the __unicode__ methods in classes that specifically
test it under Python 2
When order_by causes new joins to be added to the query, the joins must
be LEFT OUTER joins for nullable relations, otherwise the order_by
could cause the results to be altered. This commit fixes the logic to
only promote new joins, previously all joins in the order_by lookup
path were promoted.
Thanks to Bruno Desthuilliers for spotting this corner case.
Fixed#18248 -- proxy models were added to included_inherited_models
in sql.query.Query. The variable is meant to be used for multitable
inheritance only. This mistake caused problems in situations where
proxy model's query was reused.
QuerySet had previously some complex logic for dealing with nullable
fields in negated add_filter() calls. It seems the logic is leftover
from a time where the WhereNode wasn't as intelligent in handling
field__in=[] conditions.
Thanks to aaugustin for comments on the patch.
only consider some fields (PostgreSQL only).
For this, the ``distinct()`` QuerySet method now accepts an optional
list of model fields names and generates ``DISTINCT ON`` clauses on
these cases. Thanks Jeffrey Gelens and Anssi Kääriäinen for their work.
Fixes#6422.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@17244 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This monster of a patch is the result of Alex Gaynor's 2009 Google Summer of Code project.
Congratulations to Alex for a job well done.
Big thanks also go to:
* Justin Bronn for keeping GIS in line with the changes,
* Karen Tracey and Jani Tiainen for their help testing Oracle support
* Brett Hoerner, Jon Loyens, and Craig Kimmerer for their feedback.
* Malcolm Treddinick for his guidance during the GSoC submission process.
* Simon Willison for driving the original design process
* Cal Henderson for complaining about ponies he wanted.
... and everyone else too numerous to mention that helped to bring this feature into fruition.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@11952 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
The bug itself was fixed at some point in the past months (there have
been a few improvements to update() recently). Fixed#9848.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10528 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Using select_related(...) across a nullable relation to a multi-table
model inheritance situation no longer excludes results. Thanks to AdamG
for a test demonstrating part of the problem.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10136 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Calling the super() version of __reduce__ in Model.__reduce__ led to infinite
loops in Python prior to 2.5. We don't do that any longer.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10099 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
In extreme cases, some fields are expensive to load from the database
(e.g. GIS fields requiring conversion, or large text fields). This
commit adds defer() and only() methods to querysets that allow the
caller to specify which fields should not be loaded unless they are
accessed.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@10090 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Some results were inadvertently being excluded if we were ordering across a
nullable relation which itself ordering by a non-nullable relation.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9916 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Previous behaviour was pretty stupid. Let's never speak of it again. New
behaviour both works and is documented.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9759 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
This extends previous functionality that allowed passing Query objects as the
rvals to filters. You can now pass QuerySets, which requires less poking at
opaque attributes. See the documentation of the "__in" lookup type for the
details.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9701 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
Extricated the code that works directly with SQL columns (standard
"where" stuff) from the the code that takes SQL fragments and combines
it with lookup types and values. The latter portion is now more
generally reusable. Any existing code that was poking at Query.having
will now break in very visible ways (no subtle miscalculations, which is
a good thing).
This patch, en passant, removes the existing "having" test, since the
new implementation requires more setting up than previously. The
aggregates support (currently in a separate codebase) has tests for this
functionality that work as a replacement for the removed test.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9700 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
that happens with MySQL when a "GROUP BY" clause is included. This is a
backend-specific operation, so any other databases requiring similar
encouragement can have a function added to their own backend code.
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/trunk@9637 bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
