mirrors/django
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git synced 2025-10-24 06:06:09 +00:00
Code Issues 32 Releases Wiki Activity

Edited model and field checks for grammar and consistency.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Russell Keith-Magee
2014-03-03 18:18:39 +08:00
parent bc4dc6e99c
commit 82ac389486
9 changed files with 374 additions and 395 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

393
tests/invalid_models_tests/test_relative_fields.py
View File

@@ -34,13 +34,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
('The field has a relation with model Rel1, '
'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'),
hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and '
'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS '
'setting contain the app where Rel1 is defined?'),
("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel1', "
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E030',
id='fields.E300',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -53,13 +51,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Model)
expected = [
Error(
('The field has a relation with model Rel2, '
'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'),
hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and '
'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS '
'setting contain the app where Rel2 is defined?'),
("Field defines a relation with model 'Rel2', "
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E030',
id='fields.E300',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -83,15 +79,14 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
expected = [
Error(
('The model is used as an intermediary model by '
'invalid_models_tests.Group.field, but it has more than one '
'foreign key to Person, '
'which is ambiguous and is not permitted.'),
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.field', but it has more than one "
"foreign key to 'Person', which is ambiguous."),
hint=('If you want to create a recursive relationship, use '
'ForeignKey("self", symmetrical=False, '
'through="AmbiguousRelationship").'),
obj=field,
id='E027',
id='fields.E335',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -116,12 +111,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
expected = [
Error(
('The model is used as an intermediary model by '
'invalid_models_tests.Group.members, but it misses '
'a foreign key to Group or Person.'),
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not "
"have a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."),
hint=None,
obj=InvalidRelationship,
id='E028',
id='fields.E336',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -142,12 +137,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
expected = [
Error(
('The model is used as an intermediary model by '
'invalid_models_tests.Group.members, but it misses '
'a foreign key to Group or Person.'),
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
"'invalid_models_tests.Group.members', but it does not have "
"a foreign key to 'Group' or 'Person'."),
hint=None,
obj=InvalidRelationship,
id='E028',
id='fields.E336',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -164,13 +159,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
expected = [
Error(
('The field specifies a many-to-many relation through model '
'MissingM2MModel, which has not been installed.'),
hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and '
'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS '
'setting contain the app where MissingM2MModel is defined?'),
("Field specifies a many-to-many relation through model "
"'MissingM2MModel', which has not been installed."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E023',
id='fields.E331',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -191,7 +184,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.',
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E024',
id='fields.E332',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -210,13 +203,12 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Person)
expected = [
Error(
('The model is used as an intermediary model by '
'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends, but it has more than two '
'foreign keys to Person, which is ambiguous and '
'is not permitted.'),
("The model is used as an intermediate model by "
"'invalid_models_tests.Person.friends', but it has more than two "
"foreign keys to 'Person', which is ambiguous."),
hint=None,
obj=InvalidRelationship,
id='E025',
id='fields.E333',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -238,7 +230,7 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
'Many-to-many fields with intermediate tables must not be symmetrical.',
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E024',
id='fields.E332',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -255,13 +247,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
('The field has a relation with model AbstractModel, '
'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'),
hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and '
'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS '
'setting contain the app where AbstractModel is defined?'),
("Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractModel', "
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E030',
id='fields.E300',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -278,13 +268,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Model)
expected = [
Error(
('The field has a relation with model AbstractModel, '
'which has either not been installed or is abstract.'),
hint=('Ensure that you did not misspell the model name and '
'the model is not abstract. Does your INSTALLED_APPS '
'setting contain the app where AbstractModel is defined?'),
("Field defines a relation with model 'AbstractModel', "
"which is either not installed, or is abstract."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E030',
id='fields.E300',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -300,10 +288,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check(from_model=Group)
expected = [
Error(
'ManyToManyFields must not be unique.',
'ManyToManyFields cannot be unique.',
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E022',
id='fields.E330',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -319,10 +307,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Target.bad must have unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.',
"'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.",
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E019',
id='fields.E311',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -338,10 +326,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Target.bad must have unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.',
"'Target.bad' must set unique=True because it is referenced by a foreign key.",
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E019',
id='fields.E311',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -364,12 +352,11 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
('No unique=True constraint on field combination '
'"country_id,city_id" under model Person.'),
hint=('Set unique=True argument on any of the fields '
'"country_id,city_id" under model Person.'),
("None of the fields 'country_id', 'city_id' on model 'Person' "
"have a unique=True constraint."),
hint=None,
obj=field,
id='E018',
id='fields.E310',
)
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -386,10 +373,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
'The field specifies on_delete=SET_NULL, but cannot be null.',
hint='Set null=True argument on the field.',
'Field specifies on_delete=SET_NULL, but cannot be null.',
hint='Set null=True argument on the field, or change the on_delete rule.',
obj=field,
id='E020',
id='fields.E320',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -406,10 +393,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = field.check()
expected = [
Error(
'The field specifies on_delete=SET_DEFAULT, but has no default value.',
hint=None,
'Field specifies on_delete=SET_DEFAULT, but has no default value.',
hint='Set a default value, or change the on_delete rule.',
obj=field,
id='E021',
id='fields.E321',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -424,9 +411,9 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
expected = [
Error(
'Primary keys must not have null=True.',
hint='Set null=False on the field or remove primary_key=True argument.',
hint='Set null=False on the field, or remove primary_key=True argument.',
obj=field,
id='E036',
id='fields.E007',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -489,10 +476,10 @@ class RelativeFieldTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
]
expected_error = Error(
('The field defines a relation with the model '
'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel, which has been swapped out.'),
hint='Update the relation to point at settings.TEST_SWAPPED_MODEL',
id='E029',
("Field defines a relation with the model "
"'invalid_models_tests.SwappedModel', which has been swapped out."),
hint="Update the relation to point at 'settings.TEST_SWAPPED_MODEL'.",
id='fields.E301',
)
for field in fields:
@@ -546,12 +533,12 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.model_set.',
hint=('Rename field Target.model_set or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.rel.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.model_set'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.model_set', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -567,18 +554,18 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign and Model.m2m.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.foreign or Model.m2m.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.foreign' or 'Model.m2m'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m and Model.foreign.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.m2m or Model.foreign.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.m2m' or 'Model.foreign'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -602,12 +589,12 @@ class AccessorClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.children clashes with field Child.m2m_clash.',
hint=('Rename field Child.m2m_clash or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.children.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.children' clashes with field name 'Child.m2m_clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Child.m2m_clash', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.children'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('children'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
)
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -658,12 +645,12 @@ class ReverseQueryNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.model.',
hint=('Rename field Target.model or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.rel.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.model'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.model', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -714,20 +701,20 @@ class ExplicitRelatedNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.rel.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.rel.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.rel'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -784,11 +771,11 @@ class ExplicitRelatedQueryNameClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.rel clashes with field Target.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Target.clash or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.rel.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.rel' clashes with field name 'Target.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.clash', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.rel'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('rel'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -804,18 +791,18 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.first_m2m and Model.second_m2m.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.first_m2m or Model.second_m2m.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.first_m2m' or 'Model.second_m2m'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('first_m2m'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.second_m2m and Model.first_m2m.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.second_m2m or Model.first_m2m.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.second_m2m' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.first_m2m'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.second_m2m' or 'Model.first_m2m'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('second_m2m'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -827,12 +814,12 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.model_set clashes with field Model.model_set.',
hint=('Rename field Model.model_set or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.model_set.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.model_set'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -844,11 +831,11 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.model clashes with field Model.model.',
hint=('Rename field Model.model or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.model.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.model'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -862,18 +849,18 @@ class SelfReferentialM2MClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.m2m clashes with field Model.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.m2m clashes with field Model.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -898,12 +885,12 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.model_set clashes with field Model.model_set.',
hint=('Rename field Model.model_set or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.model_set.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.model_set' clashes with field name 'Model.model_set'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model_set', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.model_set'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model_set'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -915,12 +902,12 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.model clashes with field Model.model.',
hint=('Rename field Model.model or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.model.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.model' clashes with field name 'Model.model'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.model', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.model'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('model'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -933,20 +920,20 @@ class SelfReferentialFKClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.foreign clashes with field Model.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.foreign.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.foreign'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.foreign clashes with field Model.clash.',
hint=('Rename field Model.clash or add/change '
'a related_name argument to the definition '
'for field Model.foreign.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign' clashes with field name 'Model.clash'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Model.clash', or add/change "
"a related_name argument to the definition "
"for field 'Model.foreign'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)
@@ -976,91 +963,91 @@ class ComplexClashTests(IsolatedModelsTestCase):
errors = Model.check()
expected = [
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.foreign_1 clashes with field Target.id.',
hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.foreign_1.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.foreign_1 clashes with field Target.id.',
hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.foreign_1.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.foreign_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign_1 and Model.m2m_1.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to '
'the definition for Model.foreign_1 or Model.m2m_1.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to "
"the definition for 'Model.foreign_1' or 'Model.m2m_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between reverse query names for Model.foreign_1 and Model.m2m_1.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to '
'the definition for Model.foreign_1 or Model.m2m_1.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to "
"the definition for 'Model.foreign_1' or 'Model.m2m_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_1'),
id='E017',
id='fields.E305',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.foreign_2 and Model.m2m_2.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument '
'to the definition for Model.foreign_2 or Model.m2m_2.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_2' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_2'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument "
"to the definition for 'Model.foreign_2' or 'Model.m2m_2'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_2'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between reverse query names for Model.foreign_2 and Model.m2m_2.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to '
'the definition for Model.foreign_2 or Model.m2m_2.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_2' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_2'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to "
"the definition for 'Model.foreign_2' or 'Model.m2m_2'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('foreign_2'),
id='E017',
id='fields.E305',
),
Error(
'Accessor for field Model.m2m_1 clashes with field Target.id.',
hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m_1.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'),
id='E014',
id='fields.E302',
),
Error(
'Reverse query name for field Model.m2m_1 clashes with field Target.id.',
hint=('Rename field Target.id or add/change a related_name '
'argument to the definition for field Model.m2m_1.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with field name 'Target.id'.",
hint=("Rename field 'Target.id', or add/change a related_name "
"argument to the definition for field 'Model.m2m_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'),
id='E015',
id='fields.E303',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m_1 and Model.foreign_1.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.m2m_1 or Model.foreign_1.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_1'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.m2m_1' or 'Model.foreign_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between reverse query names for Model.m2m_1 and Model.foreign_1.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to '
'the definition for Model.m2m_1 or Model.foreign_1.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_1' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_1'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to "
"the definition for 'Model.m2m_1' or 'Model.foreign_1'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_1'),
id='E017',
id='fields.E305',
),
Error(
'Clash between accessors for Model.m2m_2 and Model.foreign_2.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.m2m_2 or Model.foreign_2.'),
"Reverse accessor for 'Model.m2m_2' clashes with reverse accessor for 'Model.foreign_2'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.m2m_2' or 'Model.foreign_2'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_2'),
id='E016',
id='fields.E304',
),
Error(
'Clash between reverse query names for Model.m2m_2 and Model.foreign_2.',
hint=('Add or change a related_name argument to the definition '
'for Model.m2m_2 or Model.foreign_2.'),
"Reverse query name for 'Model.m2m_2' clashes with reverse query name for 'Model.foreign_2'.",
hint=("Add or change a related_name argument to the definition "
"for 'Model.m2m_2' or 'Model.foreign_2'."),
obj=Model._meta.get_field('m2m_2'),
id='E017',
id='fields.E305',
),
]
self.assertEqual(errors, expected)