From 2e190a48d6ffda4f9f67df3657b835fa6075a25d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Adam Zapletal Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 14:10:39 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Added missing backticks to class-based views docs. --- docs/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing.txt b/docs/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing.txt index 4310ae9dcc..73d1e2eb8d 100644 --- a/docs/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing.txt +++ b/docs/topics/class-based-views/generic-editing.txt @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ The above example assumes that if the client supports ``text/html``, that they would prefer it. However, this may not always be true. When requesting a ``.css`` file, many browsers will send the header ``Accept: text/css,*/*;q=0.1``, indicating that they would prefer CSS, but -anything else is fine. This means ``request.accepts("text/html") will be +anything else is fine. This means ``request.accepts("text/html")`` will be ``True``. To determine the correct format, taking into consideration the client's