mirror of https://github.com/django/django.git
193 lines
7.0 KiB
Plaintext
193 lines
7.0 KiB
Plaintext
|
===========================
|
||
|
Testing Django applications
|
||
|
===========================
|
||
|
|
||
|
**New in Django development version**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. XXX insert quick introduction to testing (and why you'd want to do it)
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. note::
|
||
|
|
||
|
This testing framework is currently under development, and may change
|
||
|
slightly before the next official Django release.
|
||
|
|
||
|
(That's *no* excuse not to write tests, though!)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing tests
|
||
|
=============
|
||
|
|
||
|
Tests in Django come in two forms: doctests and unit tests.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing doctests
|
||
|
----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Doctests use Python's standard doctest_ module, which searches for tests in
|
||
|
your docstrings. Django's test runner looks for doctests in your ``models.py``
|
||
|
file, and executes any that it finds.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. admonition:: What's a **docstring**?
|
||
|
|
||
|
A good explanation of docstrings (and some guidlines for using them
|
||
|
effectively) can be found in :PEP:`257`:
|
||
|
|
||
|
A docstring is a string literal that occurs as the first statement in
|
||
|
a module, function, class, or method definition. Such a docstring
|
||
|
becomes the ``__doc__`` special attribute of that object.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Since tests often make great documentation, doctest lets you put your
|
||
|
tests directly in your docstrings.
|
||
|
|
||
|
You can put doctest strings on any object in your ``models.py``, but it's
|
||
|
common practice to put application-level doctests in the module docstring, and
|
||
|
model-level doctests in the docstring for each model.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For example::
|
||
|
|
||
|
from django.db import model
|
||
|
|
||
|
class Animal(models.Model):
|
||
|
"""
|
||
|
An animal that knows how to make noise
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Create some animals
|
||
|
>>> lion = Animal.objects.create(name="lion", sound="roar")
|
||
|
>>> cat = Animal.objects.create(name="cat", sound="meow")
|
||
|
|
||
|
# Make 'em speak
|
||
|
>>> lion.speak()
|
||
|
'The lion says "roar"'
|
||
|
>>> cat.speak()
|
||
|
'The cat says "meow"'
|
||
|
"""
|
||
|
|
||
|
name = models.CharField(maxlength=20)
|
||
|
sound = models.CharField(maxlength=20)
|
||
|
|
||
|
def speak(self):
|
||
|
return 'The %s says "%s"' % (self.name, self.sound)
|
||
|
|
||
|
When you `run your tests`_, the test utility will find this docstring, notice
|
||
|
that portions of it look like an interactive Python session, and execute those
|
||
|
lines while checking that the results match.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more details about how doctest works, see the `standard library
|
||
|
documentation for doctest`_
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _doctest: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-doctest.html
|
||
|
.. _standard library documentation for doctest: doctest_
|
||
|
|
||
|
Writing unittests
|
||
|
-----------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Like doctests, Django's unit tests use a standard library module: unittest_.
|
||
|
Django's test runner looks for unit test cases in a ``tests.py`` file in your
|
||
|
app (i.e. in the same directory as your ``models.py`` file).
|
||
|
|
||
|
An equivalent unittest test case for the above example would look like::
|
||
|
|
||
|
import unittest
|
||
|
from myapp.models import Animal
|
||
|
|
||
|
class AnimalTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
|
||
|
|
||
|
def setUp(self):
|
||
|
self.lion = Animal.objects.create(name="lion", sound="roar")
|
||
|
self.cat = Animal.objects.create(name="cat", sound="meow")
|
||
|
|
||
|
def testSpeaking(self):
|
||
|
self.assertEquals(self.lion.speak(), 'The lion says "roar"')
|
||
|
self.assertEquals(self.cat.speak(), 'The cat says "meow"')
|
||
|
|
||
|
When you `run your tests`_, the test utility will find all the test cases
|
||
|
(that is, subclasses of ``unittest.TestCase``) in ``tests.py``, automatically
|
||
|
build a test suite out of those test cases, and run that suite.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For more details about ``unittest``, see the `standard library unittest
|
||
|
documentation`_.
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. _unittest: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-unittest.html
|
||
|
.. _standard library unittest documentation: unittest_
|
||
|
.. _run your tests: `Running tests`_
|
||
|
|
||
|
Which should I use?
|
||
|
-------------------
|
||
|
|
||
|
Choosing a test framework is often contentious, so Django simply supports
|
||
|
both of the standard Python test frameworks. Choosing one is up to each
|
||
|
developer's personal tastes; each is supported equally. Since each test
|
||
|
system has different benefits, the best approach is probably to use both
|
||
|
together, picking the test system to match the type of tests you need to
|
||
|
write.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For developers new to testing, however, this choice can seem
|
||
|
confusing, so here are a few key differences to help you decide weather
|
||
|
doctests or unit tests are right for you.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you've been using Python for a while, ``doctest`` will probably feel more
|
||
|
"pythonic". It's designed to make writing tests as easy as possible, so
|
||
|
there's no overhead of writing classes or methods; you simply put tests in
|
||
|
docstrings. This gives the added advantage of given your modules automatic
|
||
|
documentation -- well-written doctests can kill both the documentation and the
|
||
|
testing bird with a single stone.
|
||
|
|
||
|
For developers just getting started with testing, using doctests will probably
|
||
|
get you started faster.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The ``unittest`` framework will probably feel very familiar to developers
|
||
|
coming from Java. Since ``unittest`` is inspired by Java's JUnit, if
|
||
|
you've used testing frameworks in other languages that similarly were
|
||
|
inspired by JUnit, ``unittest`` should also feel pretty familiar.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Since ``unittest`` is organized around classes and methods, if you need
|
||
|
to write a bunch of tests that all share similar code, you can easily use
|
||
|
subclass to abstract common tasks; this makes test code shorter and cleaner.
|
||
|
There's also support for explicit setup and/or cleanup routines, which give
|
||
|
you a high level of control over the environment your test cases run in.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Again, remember that you can use both systems side-by-side (even in the same
|
||
|
app). In the end, most projects will eventually end up using both; each shines
|
||
|
in different circumstances.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Running tests
|
||
|
=============
|
||
|
|
||
|
Run your tests using your project's ``manage.py`` utility::
|
||
|
|
||
|
$ ./manage.py test
|
||
|
|
||
|
You'll see a bunch of text flow by as the test database is created, models are
|
||
|
initialized, and your tests are run. If everything goes well, at the end
|
||
|
you'll see::
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
Ran 22 tests in 0.221s
|
||
|
|
||
|
OK
|
||
|
|
||
|
If there are test failures, however, you'll see full details about what tests
|
||
|
failed::
|
||
|
|
||
|
======================================================================
|
||
|
FAIL: Doctest: ellington.core.throttle.models
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
Traceback (most recent call last):
|
||
|
File "/dev/django/test/doctest.py", line 2153, in runTest
|
||
|
raise self.failureException(self.format_failure(new.getvalue()))
|
||
|
AssertionError: Failed doctest test for myapp.models
|
||
|
File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 0, in models
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
File "/dev/myapp/models.py", line 14, in myapp.models
|
||
|
Failed example:
|
||
|
throttle.check("actor A", "action one", limit=2, hours=1)
|
||
|
Expected:
|
||
|
True
|
||
|
Got:
|
||
|
False
|
||
|
|
||
|
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||
|
Ran 2 tests in 0.048s
|
||
|
|
||
|
FAILED (failures=1)
|
||
|
|