2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
from django.test import TestCase
|
2011-10-13 21:34:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-01-28 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
from .models import (
|
2016-03-28 15:19:25 +00:00
|
|
|
A,
|
|
|
|
B,
|
|
|
|
Building,
|
|
|
|
C,
|
|
|
|
Chick,
|
|
|
|
Child,
|
|
|
|
Class,
|
|
|
|
Client,
|
|
|
|
ClientStatus,
|
|
|
|
Connection,
|
2015-01-28 12:35:27 +00:00
|
|
|
Country,
|
|
|
|
Device,
|
|
|
|
Enrollment,
|
|
|
|
Hen,
|
|
|
|
Item,
|
|
|
|
Organizer,
|
|
|
|
Person,
|
|
|
|
Port,
|
|
|
|
SpecialClient,
|
|
|
|
State,
|
|
|
|
Student,
|
|
|
|
TUser,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2011-10-13 21:34:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class SelectRelatedRegressTests(TestCase):
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_7110(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Regression test for bug #7110.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When using select_related(), we must query the
|
|
|
|
Device and Building tables using two different aliases (each) in order to
|
|
|
|
differentiate the start and end Connection fields. The net result is that
|
|
|
|
both the "connections = ..." queries here should give the same results
|
|
|
|
without pulling in more than the absolute minimum number of tables
|
|
|
|
(history has shown that it's easy to make a mistake in the implementation
|
|
|
|
and include some unnecessary bonus joins).
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-23 10:09:29 +00:00
|
|
|
b = Building.objects.create(name="101")
|
|
|
|
dev1 = Device.objects.create(name="router", building=b)
|
|
|
|
dev2 = Device.objects.create(name="switch", building=b)
|
|
|
|
dev3 = Device.objects.create(name="server", building=b)
|
2013-10-26 19:15:03 +00:00
|
|
|
port1 = Port.objects.create(port_number="4", device=dev1)
|
|
|
|
port2 = Port.objects.create(port_number="7", device=dev2)
|
|
|
|
port3 = Port.objects.create(port_number="1", device=dev3)
|
2013-10-23 10:09:29 +00:00
|
|
|
c1 = Connection.objects.create(start=port1, end=port2)
|
|
|
|
c2 = Connection.objects.create(start=port2, end=port3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
connections = Connection.objects.filter(
|
|
|
|
start__device__building=b, end__device__building=b
|
|
|
|
).order_by("id")
|
2016-04-08 02:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2016-12-29 15:27:49 +00:00
|
|
|
[(c.id, str(c.start), str(c.end)) for c in connections],
|
2016-04-08 02:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
[(c1.id, "router/4", "switch/7"), (c2.id, "switch/7", "server/1")],
|
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2015-09-11 23:33:12 +00:00
|
|
|
connections = (
|
|
|
|
Connection.objects.filter(
|
|
|
|
start__device__building=b, end__device__building=b
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.select_related()
|
|
|
|
.order_by("id")
|
|
|
|
)
|
2016-04-08 02:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
2016-12-29 15:27:49 +00:00
|
|
|
[(c.id, str(c.start), str(c.end)) for c in connections],
|
2016-04-08 02:04:45 +00:00
|
|
|
[(c1.id, "router/4", "switch/7"), (c2.id, "switch/7", "server/1")],
|
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2011-12-22 20:42:40 +00:00
|
|
|
# This final query should only have seven tables (port, device and building
|
|
|
|
# twice each, plus connection once). Thus, 6 joins plus the FROM table.
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(str(connections.query).count(" JOIN "), 6)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_8106(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Regression test for bug #8106.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same sort of problem as the previous test, but this time there are
|
|
|
|
more extra tables to pull in as part of the select_related() and some
|
|
|
|
of them could potentially clash (so need to be kept separate).
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
us = TUser.objects.create(name="std")
|
|
|
|
usp = Person.objects.create(user=us)
|
|
|
|
uo = TUser.objects.create(name="org")
|
|
|
|
uop = Person.objects.create(user=uo)
|
2013-11-03 18:17:58 +00:00
|
|
|
s = Student.objects.create(person=usp)
|
|
|
|
o = Organizer.objects.create(person=uop)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
c = Class.objects.create(org=o)
|
2013-10-19 12:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Enrollment.objects.create(std=s, cls=c)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-02-22 09:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
e_related = Enrollment.objects.select_related()[0]
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(e_related.std.person.user.name, "std")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(e_related.cls.org.person.user.name, "org")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_8036(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Regression test for bug #8036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the first related model in the tests below
|
|
|
|
("state") is empty and we try to select the more remotely related
|
|
|
|
state__country. The regression here was not skipping the empty column results
|
|
|
|
for country before getting status.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-19 12:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Country.objects.create(name="Australia")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
active = ClientStatus.objects.create(name="active")
|
|
|
|
client = Client.objects.create(name="client", status=active)
|
|
|
|
|
2011-03-03 15:04:39 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(client.status, active)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(Client.objects.select_related()[0].status, active)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(Client.objects.select_related("state")[0].status, active)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
Client.objects.select_related("state", "status")[0].status, active
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
Client.objects.select_related("state__country")[0].status, active
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(
|
|
|
|
Client.objects.select_related("state__country", "status")[0].status, active
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(Client.objects.select_related("status")[0].status, active)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_multi_table_inheritance(self):
|
|
|
|
"""Exercising select_related() with multi-table model inheritance."""
|
|
|
|
c1 = Child.objects.create(name="child1", value=42)
|
2020-10-18 16:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
i1 = Item.objects.create(name="item1", child=c1)
|
|
|
|
i2 = Item.objects.create(name="item2")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-18 16:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertSequenceEqual(
|
2013-10-19 23:33:10 +00:00
|
|
|
Item.objects.select_related("child").order_by("name"),
|
2020-10-18 16:29:52 +00:00
|
|
|
[i1, i2],
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_12851(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Regression for #12851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred fields are used correctly if you select_related a subset
|
|
|
|
of fields.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
australia = Country.objects.create(name="Australia")
|
|
|
|
active = ClientStatus.objects.create(name="active")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wa = State.objects.create(name="Western Australia", country=australia)
|
2013-10-19 12:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Client.objects.create(name="Brian Burke", state=wa, status=active)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
burke = (
|
|
|
|
Client.objects.select_related("state")
|
|
|
|
.defer("state__name")
|
|
|
|
.get(name="Brian Burke")
|
2022-02-03 19:24:19 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(burke.name, "Brian Burke")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(burke.state.name, "Western Australia")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Still works if we're dealing with an inherited class
|
2013-10-19 12:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
SpecialClient.objects.create(
|
|
|
|
name="Troy Buswell", state=wa, status=active, value=42
|
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
troy = (
|
|
|
|
SpecialClient.objects.select_related("state")
|
|
|
|
.defer("state__name")
|
|
|
|
.get(name="Troy Buswell")
|
2022-02-03 19:24:19 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.name, "Troy Buswell")
|
2011-03-03 15:04:39 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.value, 42)
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.state.name, "Western Australia")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Still works if we defer an attribute on the inherited class
|
|
|
|
troy = (
|
|
|
|
SpecialClient.objects.select_related("state")
|
|
|
|
.defer("value", "state__name")
|
|
|
|
.get(name="Troy Buswell")
|
2022-02-03 19:24:19 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.name, "Troy Buswell")
|
2011-03-03 15:04:39 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.value, 42)
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.state.name, "Western Australia")
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Also works if you use only, rather than defer
|
2012-06-26 15:08:42 +00:00
|
|
|
troy = (
|
|
|
|
SpecialClient.objects.select_related("state")
|
|
|
|
.only("name", "state")
|
|
|
|
.get(name="Troy Buswell")
|
2022-02-03 19:24:19 +00:00
|
|
|
)
|
2010-09-28 07:05:51 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.name, "Troy Buswell")
|
2011-03-03 15:04:39 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.value, 42)
|
2012-06-07 16:08:47 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(troy.state.name, "Western Australia")
|
2013-02-19 02:47:47 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_null_join_promotion(self):
|
|
|
|
australia = Country.objects.create(name="Australia")
|
|
|
|
active = ClientStatus.objects.create(name="active")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wa = State.objects.create(name="Western Australia", country=australia)
|
|
|
|
bob = Client.objects.create(name="Bob", status=active)
|
|
|
|
jack = Client.objects.create(name="Jack", status=active, state=wa)
|
|
|
|
qs = Client.objects.filter(state=wa).select_related("state")
|
|
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(list(qs), [jack])
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs[0].state, wa)
|
|
|
|
# The select_related join wasn't promoted as there was already an
|
|
|
|
# existing (even if trimmed) inner join to state.
|
2014-10-28 10:02:56 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertNotIn("LEFT OUTER", str(qs.query))
|
2013-02-19 02:47:47 +00:00
|
|
|
qs = Client.objects.select_related("state").order_by("name")
|
|
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(1):
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(list(qs), [bob, jack])
|
|
|
|
self.assertIs(qs[0].state, None)
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs[1].state, wa)
|
|
|
|
# The select_related join was promoted as there is already an
|
|
|
|
# existing join.
|
2014-10-28 10:02:56 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertIn("LEFT OUTER", str(qs.query))
|
2013-02-21 09:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_19870(self):
|
|
|
|
hen = Hen.objects.create(name="Hen")
|
2013-10-19 12:31:38 +00:00
|
|
|
Chick.objects.create(name="Chick", mother=hen)
|
2013-02-21 09:12:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(Chick.objects.all()[0].mother.name, "Hen")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(Chick.objects.select_related()[0].mother.name, "Hen")
|
2013-10-01 16:27:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2014-05-10 14:41:54 +00:00
|
|
|
def test_regression_10733(self):
|
2013-10-01 16:27:20 +00:00
|
|
|
a = A.objects.create(name="a", lots_of_text="lots_of_text_a", a_field="a_field")
|
|
|
|
b = B.objects.create(name="b", lots_of_text="lots_of_text_b", b_field="b_field")
|
|
|
|
c = C.objects.create(
|
|
|
|
name="c", lots_of_text="lots_of_text_c", is_published=True, c_a=a, c_b=b
|
|
|
|
)
|
2022-02-22 09:29:38 +00:00
|
|
|
results = C.objects.only(
|
|
|
|
"name",
|
|
|
|
"lots_of_text",
|
|
|
|
"c_a",
|
|
|
|
"c_b",
|
|
|
|
"c_b__lots_of_text",
|
|
|
|
"c_a__name",
|
|
|
|
"c_b__name",
|
|
|
|
).select_related()
|
2016-09-10 09:36:27 +00:00
|
|
|
self.assertSequenceEqual(results, [c])
|
2013-10-01 16:27:20 +00:00
|
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(0):
|
|
|
|
qs_c = results[0]
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs_c.name, "c")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs_c.lots_of_text, "lots_of_text_c")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs_c.c_b.lots_of_text, "lots_of_text_b")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs_c.c_a.name, "a")
|
|
|
|
self.assertEqual(qs_c.c_b.name, "b")
|
2014-05-10 14:39:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_regression_22508(self):
|
|
|
|
building = Building.objects.create(name="101")
|
|
|
|
device = Device.objects.create(name="router", building=building)
|
|
|
|
Port.objects.create(port_number="1", device=device)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
device = Device.objects.get()
|
|
|
|
port = device.port_set.select_related("device__building").get()
|
|
|
|
with self.assertNumQueries(0):
|
|
|
|
port.device.building
|