django/tests/custom_pk/tests.py

238 lines
7.3 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
from __future__ import unicode_literals
from django.db import IntegrityError, transaction
from django.test import TestCase, skipIfDBFeature
from django.utils import six
from .models import Bar, Business, Employee, Foo
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
class BasicCustomPKTests(TestCase):
@classmethod
def setUpTestData(cls):
cls.dan = Employee.objects.create(
employee_code=123, first_name="Dan", last_name="Jones",
)
cls.fran = Employee.objects.create(
employee_code=456, first_name="Fran", last_name="Bones",
)
cls.business = Business.objects.create(name="Sears")
cls.business.employees.add(cls.dan, cls.fran)
def test_querysets(self):
"""
Both pk and custom attribute_name can be used in filter and friends
"""
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
Employee.objects.filter(pk=123), [
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
Employee.objects.filter(employee_code=123), [
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Employee.objects.filter(pk__in=[123, 456]), [
"Fran Bones",
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
Employee.objects.all(), [
"Fran Bones",
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
Business.objects.filter(name="Sears"), [
"Sears"
],
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
lambda b: b.name
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
Business.objects.filter(pk="Sears"), [
"Sears",
],
lambda b: b.name
)
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
def test_querysets_related_name(self):
"""
Custom pk doesn't affect related_name based lookups
"""
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
self.business.employees.all(), [
"Fran Bones",
"Dan Jones",
],
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
six.text_type
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
self.fran.business_set.all(), [
"Sears",
],
lambda b: b.name
)
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
def test_querysets_relational(self):
"""
Queries across tables, involving primary key
"""
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Employee.objects.filter(business__name="Sears"), [
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
"Fran Bones",
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type,
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Employee.objects.filter(business__pk="Sears"), [
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
"Fran Bones",
"Dan Jones",
],
six.text_type,
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Business.objects.filter(employees__employee_code=123), [
"Sears",
],
lambda b: b.name
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Business.objects.filter(employees__pk=123), [
"Sears",
],
lambda b: b.name,
)
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Business.objects.filter(employees__first_name__startswith="Fran"), [
"Sears",
],
lambda b: b.name
)
2014-11-07 14:35:02 +00:00
def test_get(self):
"""
Get can accept pk or the real attribute name
"""
self.assertEqual(Employee.objects.get(pk=123), self.dan)
self.assertEqual(Employee.objects.get(pk=456), self.fran)
self.assertRaises(
Employee.DoesNotExist,
lambda: Employee.objects.get(pk=42)
)
# Use the name of the primary key, rather than pk.
self.assertEqual(Employee.objects.get(employee_code=123), self.dan)
def test_pk_attributes(self):
"""
pk and attribute name are available on the model
No default id attribute is added
"""
# pk can be used as a substitute for the primary key.
# The primary key can be accessed via the pk property on the model.
e = Employee.objects.get(pk=123)
self.assertEqual(e.pk, 123)
# Or we can use the real attribute name for the primary key:
self.assertEqual(e.employee_code, 123)
self.assertRaises(AttributeError, lambda: e.id)
def test_in_bulk(self):
"""
Custom pks work with in_bulk, both for integer and non-integer types
"""
emps = Employee.objects.in_bulk([123, 456])
self.assertEqual(emps[123], self.dan)
self.assertEqual(Business.objects.in_bulk(["Sears"]), {
"Sears": self.business,
})
def test_save(self):
"""
custom pks do not affect save
"""
fran = Employee.objects.get(pk=456)
fran.last_name = "Jones"
fran.save()
self.assertQuerysetEqual(
Employee.objects.filter(last_name="Jones"), [
"Dan Jones",
"Fran Jones",
],
six.text_type
)
class CustomPKTests(TestCase):
def test_custom_pk_create(self):
"""
New objects can be created both with pk and the custom name
"""
Employee.objects.create(employee_code=1234, first_name="Foo", last_name="Bar")
Employee.objects.create(pk=1235, first_name="Foo", last_name="Baz")
Business.objects.create(name="Bears")
Business.objects.create(pk="Tears")
def test_unicode_pk(self):
# Primary key may be unicode string
2013-09-08 19:20:01 +00:00
Business.objects.create(name='jaźń')
def test_unique_pk(self):
# The primary key must also obviously be unique, so trying to create a
# new object with the same primary key will fail.
2013-09-08 19:20:01 +00:00
Employee.objects.create(
employee_code=123, first_name="Frank", last_name="Jones"
)
Fixed #21134 -- Prevented queries in broken transactions. Squashed commit of the following: commit 63ddb271a44df389b2c302e421fc17b7f0529755 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 29 22:51:00 2013 +0200 Clarified interactions between atomic and exceptions. commit 2899ec299228217c876ba3aa4024e523a41c8504 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 22 22:45:32 2013 +0200 Fixed TransactionManagementError in tests. Previous commit introduced an additional check to prevent running queries in transactions that will be rolled back, which triggered a few failures in the tests. In practice using transaction.atomic instead of the low-level savepoint APIs was enough to fix the problems. commit 4a639b059ea80aeb78f7f160a7d4b9f609b9c238 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Tue Sep 24 22:24:17 2013 +0200 Allowed nesting constraint_checks_disabled inside atomic. Since MySQL handles transactions loosely, this isn't a problem. commit 2a4ab1cb6e83391ff7e25d08479e230ca564bfef Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sat Sep 21 18:43:12 2013 +0200 Prevented running queries in transactions that will be rolled back. This avoids a counter-intuitive behavior in an edge case on databases with non-atomic transaction semantics. It prevents using savepoint_rollback() inside an atomic block without calling set_rollback(False) first, which is backwards-incompatible in tests. Refs #21134. commit 8e3db393853c7ac64a445b66e57f3620a3fde7b0 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 22 22:14:17 2013 +0200 Replaced manual savepoints by atomic blocks. This ensures the rollback flag is handled consistently in internal APIs.
2013-09-22 20:14:17 +00:00
with self.assertRaises(IntegrityError):
with transaction.atomic():
Employee.objects.create(employee_code=123, first_name="Fred", last_name="Jones")
def test_zero_non_autoincrement_pk(self):
Employee.objects.create(
employee_code=0, first_name="Frank", last_name="Jones"
)
employee = Employee.objects.get(pk=0)
self.assertEqual(employee.employee_code, 0)
def test_custom_field_pk(self):
# Regression for #10785 -- Custom fields can be used for primary keys.
new_bar = Bar.objects.create()
new_foo = Foo.objects.create(bar=new_bar)
f = Foo.objects.get(bar=new_bar.pk)
self.assertEqual(f, new_foo)
self.assertEqual(f.bar, new_bar)
f = Foo.objects.get(bar=new_bar)
self.assertEqual(f, new_foo),
self.assertEqual(f.bar, new_bar)
# SQLite lets objects be saved with an empty primary key, even though an
# integer is expected. So we can't check for an error being raised in that
# case for SQLite. Remove it from the suite for this next bit.
@skipIfDBFeature('supports_unspecified_pk')
def test_required_pk(self):
# The primary key must be specified, so an error is raised if you
# try to create an object without it.
Fixed #21134 -- Prevented queries in broken transactions. Squashed commit of the following: commit 63ddb271a44df389b2c302e421fc17b7f0529755 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 29 22:51:00 2013 +0200 Clarified interactions between atomic and exceptions. commit 2899ec299228217c876ba3aa4024e523a41c8504 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 22 22:45:32 2013 +0200 Fixed TransactionManagementError in tests. Previous commit introduced an additional check to prevent running queries in transactions that will be rolled back, which triggered a few failures in the tests. In practice using transaction.atomic instead of the low-level savepoint APIs was enough to fix the problems. commit 4a639b059ea80aeb78f7f160a7d4b9f609b9c238 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Tue Sep 24 22:24:17 2013 +0200 Allowed nesting constraint_checks_disabled inside atomic. Since MySQL handles transactions loosely, this isn't a problem. commit 2a4ab1cb6e83391ff7e25d08479e230ca564bfef Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sat Sep 21 18:43:12 2013 +0200 Prevented running queries in transactions that will be rolled back. This avoids a counter-intuitive behavior in an edge case on databases with non-atomic transaction semantics. It prevents using savepoint_rollback() inside an atomic block without calling set_rollback(False) first, which is backwards-incompatible in tests. Refs #21134. commit 8e3db393853c7ac64a445b66e57f3620a3fde7b0 Author: Aymeric Augustin <aymeric.augustin@m4x.org> Date: Sun Sep 22 22:14:17 2013 +0200 Replaced manual savepoints by atomic blocks. This ensures the rollback flag is handled consistently in internal APIs.
2013-09-22 20:14:17 +00:00
with self.assertRaises(IntegrityError):
with transaction.atomic():
Employee.objects.create(first_name="Tom", last_name="Smith")