2013-07-25 13:45:38 +00:00
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
Migrations
|
|
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. module:: django.db.migrations
|
|
|
|
:synopsis: Schema migration support for Django models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. versionadded:: 1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrations are Django's way of propagating changes you make to your models
|
|
|
|
(adding a field, deleting a model, etc.) into your database schema. They're
|
|
|
|
designed to be mostly automatic, but you'll need to know when to make
|
|
|
|
migrations, when to run them, and the common problems you might run into.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Brief History
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to version 1.7, Django only supported adding new models to the
|
|
|
|
database; it was not possible to alter or remove existing models via the
|
|
|
|
``syncdb`` command (the predecessor to ``migrate``).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party tools, most notably `South <http://south.aeracode.org>`_,
|
|
|
|
provided support for these additional types of change, but it was considered
|
|
|
|
important enough that support was brought into core Django.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two Commands
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are two commands which you will use to interact with migrations
|
|
|
|
and Django's handling of database schema:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* :djadmin:`migrate`, which is responsible for applying migrations, as well as
|
|
|
|
unapplying and listing their status.
|
2013-07-25 15:19:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 13:45:38 +00:00
|
|
|
* :djadmin:`makemigrations`, which is responsible for creating new migrations
|
|
|
|
based on the changes you have made to your models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's worth noting that migrations are created and run on a per-app basis.
|
|
|
|
In particular, it's possible to have apps that *do not use migrations* (these
|
|
|
|
are referred to as "unmigrated" apps) - these apps will instead mimic the
|
|
|
|
legacy behaviour of just adding new models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should think of migrations as a version control system for your database
|
|
|
|
schema. ``makemigrations`` is responsible for packaging up your model changes
|
|
|
|
into individual migration files - analagous to commits - and ``migrate`` is
|
|
|
|
responsible for applying those to your database.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The migration files for each app live in a "migrations" directory inside
|
|
|
|
of that app, and are designed to be committed to, and distributed as part
|
|
|
|
of, its codebase. You should be making them once on your development machine
|
|
|
|
and then running the same migrations on your colleagues' machines, your
|
2013-08-10 19:00:12 +00:00
|
|
|
staging machines, and eventually your production machines.
|
2013-07-25 13:45:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrations will run the same way every time and produce consistent results,
|
|
|
|
meaning that what you see in development and staging is exactly what will
|
|
|
|
happen in production - no unexpected surprises.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backend Support
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrations are supported on all backends that Django ships with, as well
|
|
|
|
as any third-party backends if they have programmed in support for schema
|
2013-08-10 19:00:12 +00:00
|
|
|
alteration (done via the ``SchemaEditor`` class).
|
2013-07-25 13:45:38 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, some databases are more capable than others when it comes to
|
|
|
|
schema migrations; some of the caveats are covered below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PostgreSQL
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PostgreSQL is the most capable of all the databases here in terms of schema
|
|
|
|
support; the only caveat is that adding columns with default values will
|
|
|
|
lock a table for a time proportional to the number of rows in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For this reason, it's recommended you always create new columns with
|
|
|
|
``null=True``, as this way they will be added immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MySQL
|
|
|
|
~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MySQL lacks support for transactions around schema alteration operations,
|
|
|
|
meaning that if a migration fails to apply you will have to manually unpick
|
|
|
|
the changes in order to try again (it's impossible to roll back to an
|
|
|
|
earlier point).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, MySQL will lock tables for almost every schema operation and
|
|
|
|
generally takes a time proportional to the number of rows in the table to
|
|
|
|
add or remove columns. On slower hardware this can be worse than a minute
|
|
|
|
per million rows - adding a few columns to a table with just a few million
|
|
|
|
rows could lock your site up for over ten minutes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally, MySQL has reasonably small limits on name lengths for columns, tables
|
|
|
|
and indexes, as well as a limit on the combined size of all columns an index
|
|
|
|
covers. This means that indexes that are possible on other backends will
|
|
|
|
fail to be created under MySQL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SQLite
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SQLite has very little built-in schema alteration support, and so Django
|
|
|
|
attempts to emulate it by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Creating a new table with the new schema
|
|
|
|
* Copying the data across
|
|
|
|
* Dropping the old table
|
|
|
|
* Renaming the new table to match the original name
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This process generally works well, but it can be slow and occasionally
|
|
|
|
buggy. It is not recommended that you run and migrate SQLite in a
|
|
|
|
production environment unless you are very aware of the risks and
|
|
|
|
its limitations; the support Django ships with is designed to allow
|
|
|
|
developers to use SQLite on their local machines to develop less complex
|
|
|
|
Django projects without the need for a full database.
|
2013-07-25 15:19:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow
|
|
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working with migrations is simple. Make changes to your models - say, add
|
|
|
|
a field and remove a model - and then run :djadmin:`makemigrations`::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ python manage.py makemigrations
|
|
|
|
Migrations for 'books':
|
|
|
|
0003_auto.py:
|
|
|
|
- Alter field author on book
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your models will be scanned and compared to the versions currently
|
|
|
|
contained in your migration files, and then a new set of migrations
|
|
|
|
will be written out. Make sure to read the output to see what
|
|
|
|
``makemigrations`` thinks you have changed - it's not perfect, and for
|
|
|
|
complex changes it might not be detecting what you expect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once you have your new migration files, you should apply them to your
|
|
|
|
database to make sure they work as expected::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ python manage.py migrate
|
|
|
|
Operations to perform:
|
|
|
|
Synchronize unmigrated apps: sessions, admin, messages, auth, staticfiles, contenttypes
|
|
|
|
Apply all migrations: books
|
|
|
|
Synchronizing apps without migrations:
|
|
|
|
Creating tables...
|
|
|
|
Installing custom SQL...
|
|
|
|
Installing indexes...
|
|
|
|
Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
|
|
|
|
Running migrations:
|
|
|
|
Applying books.0003_auto... OK
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The command runs in two stages; first, it synchronizes unmigrated apps
|
|
|
|
(performing the same functionality that ``syncdb`` used to provide), and
|
|
|
|
then it runs any migrations that have not yet been applied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the migration is applied, commit the migration and the models change
|
|
|
|
to your version control system as a single commit - that way, when other
|
|
|
|
developers (or your production servers) check out the code, they'll
|
|
|
|
get both the changes to your models and the accompanying migration at the
|
|
|
|
same time.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-26 15:28:09 +00:00
|
|
|
Version control
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because migrations are stored in version control, you'll occasionally
|
|
|
|
come across situations where you and another developer have both committed
|
|
|
|
a migration to the same app at the same time, resulting in two migrations
|
|
|
|
with the same number.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't worry - the numbers are just there for developers' reference, Django
|
|
|
|
just cares that each migration has a different name. Migrations specify which
|
|
|
|
other migrations they depend on - including earlier migrations in the same
|
|
|
|
app - in the file, so it's possible to detect when there's two new migrations
|
|
|
|
for the same app that aren't ordered.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When this happens, Django will prompt you and give you some options. If it
|
2013-08-10 19:00:12 +00:00
|
|
|
thinks it's safe enough, it will offer to automatically linearize the two
|
2013-07-26 15:28:09 +00:00
|
|
|
migrations for you. If not, you'll have to go in and modify the migrations
|
|
|
|
yourself - don't worry, this isn't difficult, and is explained more in
|
|
|
|
:ref:`migration-files` below.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 15:19:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Dependencies
|
|
|
|
------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While migrations are per-app, the tables and relationships implied by
|
|
|
|
your models are too complex to be created for just one app at a time. When
|
|
|
|
you make a migration that requires something else to run - for example,
|
|
|
|
you add a ForeignKey in your ``books`` app to your ``authors`` app - the
|
|
|
|
resulting migration will contain a dependency on a migration in ``authors``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This means that when you run the migrations, the ``authors`` migration runs
|
2013-08-10 19:00:12 +00:00
|
|
|
first and creates the table the ``ForeignKey`` references, and then the migration
|
|
|
|
that makes the ``ForeignKey`` column runs afterwards and creates the constraint.
|
2013-07-25 15:19:36 +00:00
|
|
|
If this didn't happen, the migration would try to create the ForeignKey column
|
|
|
|
without the table it's referencing existing and your database would
|
|
|
|
throw an error.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This dependency behaviour affects most migration operations where you
|
|
|
|
restrict to a single app. Restricting to a single app (either in
|
|
|
|
``makemigrations`` or ``migrate``) is a best-efforts promise, and not
|
|
|
|
a guarantee; any other apps that need to be used to get dependencies correct
|
|
|
|
will be.
|
|
|
|
|
2013-08-27 12:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _migration-files:
|
2013-07-26 15:28:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-07-25 15:19:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Migration files
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Migrations are stored as an on-disk format, referred to here as
|
|
|
|
"migration files". These files are actually just normal Python files with
|
|
|
|
an agreed-upon object layout, written in a declarative style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A basic migration file looks like this::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from django.db import migrations, models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Migration(migrations.Migration):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dependencies = [("migrations", "0001_initial")]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operations = [
|
|
|
|
migrations.DeleteModel("Tribble"),
|
|
|
|
migrations.AddField("Author", "rating", models.IntegerField(default=0)),
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What Django looks for when it loads a migration file (as a Python module) is
|
|
|
|
a subclass of ``django.db.migrations.Migration`` called ``Migration``. It then
|
|
|
|
inspects this object for four attributes, only two of which are used
|
|
|
|
most of the time:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ``dependencies``, a list of migrations this one depends on.
|
|
|
|
* ``operations``, a list of Operation classes that define what this migration
|
|
|
|
does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The operations are the key; they are a set of declarative instructions which
|
|
|
|
tell Django what schema changes need to be made. Django scans them and
|
|
|
|
builds an in-memory representation of all of the schema changes to all apps,
|
|
|
|
and uses this to generate the SQL which makes the schema changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That in-memory structure is also used to work out what the differences are
|
|
|
|
between your models and the current state of your migrations; Django runs
|
|
|
|
through all the changes, in order, on an in-memory set of models to come
|
|
|
|
up with the state of your models last time you ran ``makemigrations``. It
|
|
|
|
then uses these models to compare against the ones in your ``models.py`` files
|
|
|
|
to work out what you have changed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You should rarely, if ever, need to edit migration files by hand, but
|
|
|
|
it's entirely possible to write them manually if you need to. Some of the
|
|
|
|
more complex operations are not autodetectable and are only available via
|
|
|
|
a hand-written migration, so don't be scared about editing them if you have to.
|
2013-07-26 15:28:09 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding migrations to apps
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adding migrations to new apps is straightforward - they come preconfigured to
|
|
|
|
accept migrations, and so just run :djadmin:`makemigrations` once you've made
|
|
|
|
some changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If your app already has models and database tables, and doesn't have migrations
|
|
|
|
yet (for example, you created it against a previous Django version), you'll
|
|
|
|
need to convert it to use migrations; this is a simple process::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
python manage.py makemigrations --force yourappname
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will make a new initial migration for your app (the ``--force`` argument
|
|
|
|
is to override Django's default behaviour, as it thinks your app does not want
|
|
|
|
migrations). Now, when you run :djadmin:`migrate`, Django will detect that
|
|
|
|
you have an initial migration *and* that the tables it wants to create already
|
|
|
|
exist, and will mark the migration as already applied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this only works given two things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* You have not changed your models since you made their tables. For migrations
|
|
|
|
to work, you must make the initial migration *first* and then make changes,
|
|
|
|
as Django compares changes against migration files, not the database.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* You have not manually edited your database - Django won't be able to detect
|
|
|
|
that your database doesn't match your models, you'll just get errors when
|
2013-08-10 19:00:12 +00:00
|
|
|
migrations try to modify those tables.
|
2013-07-30 11:34:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-08-27 12:05:13 +00:00
|
|
|
.. _historical-models:
|
2013-07-30 11:34:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical models
|
|
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you run migrations, Django is working from historical versions of
|
|
|
|
your models stored in the migration files. If you write Python code
|
|
|
|
using the ``django.db.migrations.RunPython`` operation, or if you have
|
|
|
|
``allow_migrate`` methods on your database routers, you will be exposed
|
|
|
|
to these versions of your models.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because it's impossible to serialize arbitrary Python code, these historical
|
|
|
|
models will not have any custom methods or managers that you have defined.
|
|
|
|
They will, however, have the same fields, relationships and ``Meta`` options
|
|
|
|
(also versioned, so they may be different from your current ones).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the base classes of the model are just stored as pointers,
|
|
|
|
so you must always keep base classes around for as long as there is a migration
|
|
|
|
that contains a reference to them. On the plus side, methods and managers
|
|
|
|
from these base classes inherit normally, so if you absolutely need access
|
|
|
|
to these you can opt to move them into a superclass.
|